Trek Fuel 9.5 Weight
01-19-08, 09:52 PM
#1
Generic Title
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,927
Bikes: 2008 Trek Fuel EX7, 2007 Trek 1600, 2007 Eastern Warthog
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Trek Fuel 9.5 Weight
Just curious. I heard that it weighs <20 pounds, which is ridiculous.
01-19-08, 10:04 PM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 927
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Survey says. . . . . .
No.
To be fair, I typed the title of your thread into Google and had an answer in less that thirty seconds. Just, you know, something to think about.
No.
To be fair, I typed the title of your thread into Google and had an answer in less that thirty seconds. Just, you know, something to think about.
01-19-08, 10:05 PM
#3
Generic Title
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,927
Bikes: 2008 Trek Fuel EX7, 2007 Trek 1600, 2007 Eastern Warthog
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Screenshot, or it didn't happen.
EDIT: Kai, found it. I was using to specific search words. 24 pounds.
01-19-08, 10:07 PM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 927
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
First page near the bottom:
https://www.bicycling.com/article/1,6...6092-1,00.html
This relies on the (safe) assumption that the 2008 didn't magically lose five pounds of weight.
You seriously couldn't find this?
https://www.bicycling.com/article/1,6...6092-1,00.html
This relies on the (safe) assumption that the 2008 didn't magically lose five pounds of weight.
You seriously couldn't find this?
01-19-08, 10:09 PM
#5
Generic Title
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,927
Bikes: 2008 Trek Fuel EX7, 2007 Trek 1600, 2007 Eastern Warthog
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
First page near the bottom:
https://www.bicycling.com/article/1,6...6092-1,00.html
This relies on the (safe) assumption that the 2008 didn't magically lose five pounds of weight.
You seriously couldn't find this?
https://www.bicycling.com/article/1,6...6092-1,00.html
This relies on the (safe) assumption that the 2008 didn't magically lose five pounds of weight.
You seriously couldn't find this?
