Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-11-08, 07:13 PM   #1
Knave
SQL Error: table 'user'
Thread Starter
 
Knave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Tough going uphill

I know that bikes built for downhill can't be ridden up because of the extra weight and suspension, but when we're talking about hardtails that are lighter and have smaller tubing, what part of the bike influences its uphill ability? I was looking at the Norco Sasquatch and heard that it's a tough uphill ride. On a bike like this, is it the frame geometry which is the deciding factor?
Knave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-08, 07:17 PM   #2
Cheeto
Banned.
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Georgia
Bikes: Trek 3900
Posts: 1,831
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Geometry, front fork, chainstay length, tire grip, rider ability
Am I wrong?
Cheeto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-08, 07:18 PM   #3
BenLi
Hardrocker
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 1,569
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knave View Post
is it the frame geometry which is the deciding factor?
Yes. Much of it is due to the slacker headtube angle and the tall front end (I think about 6 inches) makes the front wheel wander during climbs.

EDIT: If you notice on the Norco website, the Sasquatch is classified as a "Shore (read: freeride) Hardtail".

What you're talking about in terms of a hardtail is a XC hardtail. Look a bike with a headtube angle of 70 ish and with around 80-100mm of travel.

Last edited by BenLi; 03-11-08 at 07:24 PM.
BenLi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-08, 07:26 PM   #4
never
Custom User
 
never's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: T0L0K0
Bikes:
Posts: 3,739
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenLi View Post
Yes. Much of it is due to the slacker headtube angle and the tall front end (I think about 6 inches) makes the front wheel wander during climbs.
And a slacker seat tube angle which puts you further back on the bike and makes it harder putting power to the pedals.

A lot of the differences can be compensated for by changing climbing technique but you likely will never climb as if you were on a XC race bike. But then again, people don't buy bikes like the Sasquatch for their climbing ability.
never is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-08, 07:31 PM   #5
Knave
SQL Error: table 'user'
Thread Starter
 
Knave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Bikes:
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenLi
If you notice on the Norco website, the Sasquatch is classified as a "Shore (read: freeride) Hardtail".

What you're talking about in terms of a hardtail is a XC hardtail.
And therein lies my problem. I kind of want a bit of both worlds. The Specialized P. All Mountain was recommended to me as a good all-around bike. But if you ask me, the Sasquatch and P. All Mtn seem to have very similar frame size and angles. Not to mention that the Norco is less expensive and seems to have a good reputation.

http://www.norco.com/bikes/mountain/...aae75882dbe3de
http://www.specialized.com/bc/SBCBkM...48&language=US
Knave is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:28 AM.