Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Which one would you choose?

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Which one would you choose?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-08, 04:13 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
xfimpg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,137

Bikes: RichardZEP

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Which one would you choose?

Okay, some context here... you're tired of dying as you're climbing hills, so you've decided to replace your 11-25 for an 11-32... or is it going to be an 11-34...?
Ratio and shifting wise (quality being equal for both), any advantage one over the other?

Thanks for your thoughts!
Mike
xfimpg is offline  
Old 03-26-08, 06:30 PM
  #2  
Old School Rad
 
mtnbiker66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The old Mountains
Posts: 8,206

Bikes: Blur LT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well...the 34 will spin a little easier.
__________________
Like a circus monkey on a stolen Harley......
mtnbiker66 is offline  
Old 03-26-08, 06:34 PM
  #3  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,569
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mtnbiker66
Well...the 34 will spin a little easier.
However, the rotational inertia (due to the huge 34 teeth cog) will be increased by 0.1%, causing a .0006% decrease in efficiency.
Cyclist30907654 is offline  
Old 03-26-08, 06:41 PM
  #4  
one less horse
 
cryptid01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Hinterlands
Posts: 5,601
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
My opinion is that the 34 will be lighter.
cryptid01 is offline  
Old 03-26-08, 06:43 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
xfimpg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,137

Bikes: RichardZEP

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I just rechecked the cog specs, 28-32 teeth and 30-34 teeth jump, so not any difference there for shifting latency.

Thanks for the feedback. Looks like it'll come to price or the best deal... doesn't it always?
xfimpg is offline  
Old 03-26-08, 07:17 PM
  #6  
pedal head
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,004
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by xfimpg
Okay, some context here... you're tired of dying as you're climbing hills, so you've decided to replace your 11-25 for an 11-32... or is it going to be an 11-34...?
Ratio and shifting wise (quality being equal for both), any advantage one over the other?

Thanks for your thoughts!
Mike
First of all, 11-25 is typically found on a road cassette. The low gear on a MTB cassette is usually 32 or 34.

What MTB comes with an 11-25???
probable556 is offline  
Old 03-26-08, 07:22 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
xfimpg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,137

Bikes: RichardZEP

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by probable556
First of all, 11-25 is typically found on a road cassette. The low gear on a MTB cassette is usually 32 or 34.

What MTB comes with an 11-25???
This is for a roadie. I posted this question here in relation to the cassette size.
xfimpg is offline  
Old 03-26-08, 07:25 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,063
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by gastro
My opinion is that the 34 will be lighter.
I had one of each sitting in the basement for months... next to my scale. I installed the 32 yesterday without weighing it. Thus, I cannot confirm or refute.
ghettocruiser is offline  
Old 03-26-08, 07:27 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
xfimpg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,137

Bikes: RichardZEP

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by gastro
My opinion is that the 34 will be lighter.
Hey, is that old BrickTop you got for an avatar? Great character.
xfimpg is offline  
Old 03-26-08, 11:31 PM
  #10  
M_S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,693
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by xfimpg
This is for a roadie. I posted this question here in relation to the cassette size.
Are you using a road rear derailleur?
M_S is offline  
Old 03-27-08, 09:46 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
xfimpg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,137

Bikes: RichardZEP

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by M_S
Are you using a road rear derailleur?
Nah, going to a Deore LX or XT long cage.
xfimpg is offline  
Old 03-27-08, 11:08 AM
  #12  
Writin' stuff
 
ZeCanon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Durango, CO
Posts: 3,784
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times in 4 Posts
9 spd I assume? sram makes an 11-28 10speed.. not sure about 9. I wouldn't want the big cog leaps you'll find in an 11-32 on the road.
ZeCanon is offline  
Old 03-27-08, 12:45 PM
  #13  
.
 
ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Summit of Lee
Posts: 10,939

Bikes: Hecklah

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I've come close to ripping my frt. derailleur off and repl. it with a chain guide several times. The only thing that's kept my 22/32/BG with 11/34t setup is the few long rides that ended in a near vomit experience...the 22x34 ratio kept my legs moving and kept me on the bike for that last climb.

I'd go 34, but...I'm on a 32lb inefficient piggy.
ed is offline  
Old 03-27-08, 12:47 PM
  #14  
Still kicking.
 
Dannihilator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Annandale, New Jersey
Posts: 19,659

Bikes: Bike Count: Rising.

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 46 Times in 32 Posts
I'd go 32.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Dannihilator is offline  
Old 03-27-08, 03:16 PM
  #15  
M_S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,693
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ZeCanon
9 spd I assume? sram makes an 11-28 10speed.. not sure about 9. I wouldn't want the big cog leaps you'll find in an 11-32 on the road.
I used a 52/42 with 11-32 in back most of this summer. An odd setup, I know, but it seemed to work out pretty well. 'Course I had been using 7 speed previously so the gaps in shifting felt to be about the same. Currently my main ride has a 39 x 26 low gearm which seems adequate. Haven't done any ultra hilly 200 mile races or anything though...

To the OP I'd go for the 28 (as zecannon suggested) myself since you've also go the 34. That's a pretty low gear. Other than that, 32 I guess. The shifting will feel clunky either way compared to a standard road cassette, but that's just the price you pay for a wider gear range.
M_S is offline  
Old 03-27-08, 03:22 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
TheFlip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 209

Bikes: 70s Motobecane and '06 Enduro (and a kickass little pink and purple schwinn)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I vote 34
TheFlip is offline  
Old 03-27-08, 05:04 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
xfimpg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,137

Bikes: RichardZEP

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks everyone, I appreciate all your feedback.
xfimpg is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.