MTB vs. Road bicycle sizing
#1
Peloton Shelter Dog
Thread Starter
MTB vs. Road bicycle sizing
I've always sized my bicycles (road and MTB) by effective top tube length. That translates into 56-57cm tt length for me on road bikes. My old MTB hardtail and my new one both have 57cm effective tt lengths. That seems to work for me. All that other stuff (seat tube length, angles) always seemed much less relevant for me.
Any thoughts on this?
Any thoughts on this?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sunny Tampa, Florida
Posts: 1,542
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 101 Post(s)
Liked 49 Times
in
41 Posts
Cockpit length can only be adjusted so far with stems and seat setback so far without affecting handling or pedaling, so it makes sense to use that as a first measurement.
#3
Lost in the Black Hills
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,725
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
yeah, mtb fitting much less important than road bike. but you already knew that
mx
mx
__________________
Tomac Mountain Bikes | Light-Bikes l Magura USA | Industry Nine | Schwalbe Tires | Caffélatex
Tomac Mountain Bikes | Light-Bikes l Magura USA | Industry Nine | Schwalbe Tires | Caffélatex
#4
DNPAIMFB
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cowtown, AB
Posts: 4,655
Bikes: Titus El Guapo, Misfit diSSent, Cervelo Soloist Carbon, Wabi Lightning, et al.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I agree on the TT length being most vital. Most other things come together once you have that right. As far as the angles go, I really do prefer a 73 HT on the road, and a 71 for HT mtn bikes. When you get into more than 3" travel, the frame design necessitates a certain head angle, or the bike will handle like crap.