Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

fit question: better to go too large or too small?

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

fit question: better to go too large or too small?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-22-08, 08:36 PM
  #1  
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,548
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
fit question: better to go too large or too small?

alright...

so i'm thinking of getting a titus motolite. i used competitive cyclists fit calculator...according to them, i'm between a XS and a S. the XS has a toptube that is about 1" too short...but the S has a standover of about 1" too short. what's more important?

leonard zinn's fit calculator says the XS top tube is fine...

hmmm....
celerystalksme is offline  
Old 05-22-08, 10:35 PM
  #2  
Mmmmm potatoes
 
idcruiserman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,921
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Standover 1" too short as in you can't touch the ground without smashing your delicate bits?

I would go for the shorter top tube.
idcruiserman is offline  
Old 05-22-08, 11:32 PM
  #3  
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,548
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by idcruiserman
Standover 1" too short as in you can't touch the ground without smashing your delicate bits?

I would go for the shorter top tube.
no, not that bad. but both zinn's sight and competitive cyclist recommend around 3 inches of standover clearance for mountain bikes. the small size motolite would give me like 1 inch of standover.
celerystalksme is offline  
Old 05-22-08, 11:36 PM
  #4  
M_S
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,693
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would be fine with that, especially for XC...but would you?

ETT is more important than standover, by far, but if it's not a huge difference you can compensate with a longer stem and setback seatpost.
M_S is offline  
Old 05-23-08, 07:43 AM
  #5  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,363

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6219 Post(s)
Liked 4,218 Times in 2,365 Posts
Originally Posted by M_S
I would be fine with that, especially for XC...but would you?

ETT is more important than standover, by far, but if it's not a huge difference you can compensate with a longer stem and setback seatpost.
The effective toptube is only more important if you plan on never having to get off the bike. One measurement is not 'more important' than the other. As you've said, however, a short or long toptube length can be adjusted. The standover height can't be adjusted...unless you want to wear a pair of these

__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Old 05-24-08, 02:11 AM
  #6  
unofficial roadie
 
DirtPedalerB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Out in the woods you see
Posts: 1,440

Bikes: 2004 Marin bobcat trail, 2006 trek fuel ex7, 2007 iron horse road bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'd opt for less standover or a differnt bike... if your using the 3 inch standover rule, 2 inches is fine
DirtPedalerB is offline  
Old 05-24-08, 07:43 AM
  #7  
Pint-Sized Gnar Shredder
 
Zephyr11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere between heaven and hell
Posts: 3,549

Bikes: '09 Jamis Komodo, '09 Mirraco Blend One, '08 Cervelo P2C, '08 Specialized Ruby Elite, '07 Yeti AS-R SL, '07 DMR Drone

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Just out of curiosity...have you seen it in person yet? Different companies measure standover at different spots on the top tube, and I swear measure to different spots on the top tube itself. The smallest 575 has a standover of 28.5, while the smallest Nomad has a standover of 28.2. I have maybe an inch of clearance on the 575. On the Nomad though...I "stood" over that bike and sat on the top tube and had to go tippy toes to get myself off the bike.
Zephyr11 is offline  
Old 05-24-08, 11:44 AM
  #8  
Wood Licker
 
Maelstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966

Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Personally, its always better to go a little small, you can adjust a bike "bigger" but you can't shrink it down.
Maelstrom is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.