Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 18 of 18
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Eugene, OR
    My Bikes
    Jamis XLT 2.0, Kona Fire Mountain
    Posts
    564
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Hardtail XC Steel v Full Suspension AM

    I'm upgrading bikes and a little bit unsure what to get (still fairly green). I've been looking at getting a steel hardtail that weighs in at 25#s, or an AM FS -- 30#s. I've been leaning towards the hardtail because it's used (lightly 2.5 yrs old) and I can get it at a better price. However, it seems to be sold as a "race" bike. I have no interest in racing. I like riding singletrack -- and earning my downs. I really enjoy the descent. I was riding the local trails yesterday on my friend's FS XC bike and felt like I was probably glad to have a little suspsension in the rear, but I hear steel is a very forgiving ride downhill (maybe even comparable to an inch of rear suspension).

    So I guess my question is are these "race" bikes (Jamis) up for taking me down bumpy descents or are they only ideal for smooth flat riding and climbing? Would I be better off coughing up the extra cash and going with an AM?

    Thanks everyone in advance for the input.

  2. #2
    In search of moar cowbell dminor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The 509
    My Bikes
    1971 Suzuki TS125/ factory race kit/AHRMA-legal; 1969 Suzuki TS250/factory race kit; 1967 Suzuki K-15 Hillbilly Trail 80; 1977 Yamaha IT175; 1964 VanTech Scrambler racing frame
    Posts
    12,129
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Scratcher33 View Post
    . . . but I hear steel is a very forgiving ride downhill (maybe even comparable to an inch of rear suspension).
    Whoever is filling your ear with that BS is irresponsible . Steel is 'forgiving' only in not transferring the resonance of every single piece of gravel on a trail through the frame, that's all. BIG, fat tires can compare to a couple of inches of rear travel; but that's as far as it goes.

    If you are finding that the descents are what really do it for you, do yourself a favor and look more toward an AM that will still be there for you as you start to push the envelope of your descending prowess.

  3. #3
    :\ ping of death troie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    La$ Vega$
    Posts
    1,381
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What steel bike weighs in at 25lbs?

  4. #4
    Senior Member Rutnick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,894
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by troie View Post
    What steel bike weighs in at 25lbs?

    Mine

    Salsa Ala Carte frame
    Fox F32 80RL fork
    X.9 rear derailer
    XTR front derailer
    XT cranks
    x.9 shifters
    Easton Monkeylite carbon bar
    Avid BB7 brakes (7" front rotor)
    Thomson seatpost
    Specialized Rival saddle
    Bontrager Race X lite front wheel
    Mavic Enduro rear
    shimano 11-32 rear cassette
    KMC chain
    shimano 520 pedals
    IRC Mibro 2.1" tubed tires with stans sealant tubeless
    Easton EA50 stem
    Sram 9.0 brake levers

    changing out just a few parts would make it easily in the low 24lb range.

    BTW, the frame is 4.4lbs and is ox platinum.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    705
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Why aren't you considering a lighter XC FS like your friend's?

    I have a Jamis Dragon (steel HT), was running some narrow 1.9" tires...I suppose it's more forgiving than an AL frame, but it's still pretty bumpy...especially compared to the 5" travel FS bikes I demo-ed... Not sure that a 30 pound AM would be any more enjoyable, though...that's a lot of weight to lug around...

    It's not really that hard to get a steel bike down to 25 pounds...my Dragon is around 26, I could lose a pound just by replacing the boat anchor fork with something lighter...

  6. #6
    Senior Member Rutnick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,894
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by troie View Post
    What steel bike weighs in at 25lbs?
    and for double jeopardy...I have a sub 20lb lugged steel road bike built up with dura ace 9 speed and the frame was made in 1985.

  7. #7
    M_S
    M_S is offline
    All Mod Cons M_S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Face down in a snowbank
    My Bikes
    K2 Enemey Cyclocross franken build; Redline D660 29er, Volpe SS Cross
    Posts
    3,694
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Split the difference. Full suspension XC bike. Something in the 4 inch travel range. Maybe 5.

  8. #8
    Peloton Dog patentcad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Chester, NY
    My Bikes
    2013 Scott Foil, 2009 Scott Addict R2, 2008 Cervelo P3 TT bike, 2008 Motobecane Fly Ti Hard Tail MTB
    Posts
    55,942
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    I have a new Motobecane Fly Ti MTB and I love it, but if you like those descents, get a full suspension.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    southern oregon
    Posts
    2,631
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by M_S View Post
    Split the difference. Full suspension XC bike. Something in the 4 inch travel range. Maybe 5.
    Yep, this is kinda what I did.. a lightweight AM bike.. 120mm front, 110mm in back, 25.5lbs. No real penalty climbing compared to a hardtail, but a big plus on the flats and descents. It will cost some money to get a fs down to that weight, but well worth it.

  10. #10
    Old School Rad mtnbiker66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The old Mountains
    My Bikes
    Blur LT
    Posts
    8,212
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Go with an AM rig. When you move to bigger burlier stuff you'll be glad you did.
    Last edited by dminor; 06-03-08 at 05:34 PM.
    Like a circus monkey on a stolen Harley......

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    163
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    get a moots

  12. #12
    Old School Rad mtnbiker66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The old Mountains
    My Bikes
    Blur LT
    Posts
    8,212
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by grail29er View Post
    get a moots
    Why?
    Like a circus monkey on a stolen Harley......

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Boulder, Colorado
    Posts
    25
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I had a very nice steel bike and I would say that it moved with me down hill (kind of like ti, but steel "springs" slower). I loved it, but saying it is like suspension is BS.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Eugene, OR
    My Bikes
    Jamis XLT 2.0, Kona Fire Mountain
    Posts
    564
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by troie View Post
    What steel bike weighs in at 25lbs?
    It's a Jamis Dakota xc which became the dragon the next year (and the dakota became aluminum only).

    Quote Originally Posted by troie View Post
    Why aren't you considering a lighter XC FS like your friend's?
    My friend's XC FS weighs in at 29.5#s.

    I've got a strict $1400 price limit -- which is already more than I had hoped to spend -- so I'm looking at buying new old stock.

    I've found a nice 2006 FS XC that weighs (according the manufacturer) 29.25#s for 1200 that retailed at 1700. But I've also found an FS AM that weighs 29.75#s for 1400 that retailed at 2300.

    So I'm still not totally sure what I'll do, but thanks for all the advice!

    Would the geometry of the XC affect the climbing ability much or is it mostly the weight?

  15. #15
    M_S
    M_S is offline
    All Mod Cons M_S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Face down in a snowbank
    My Bikes
    K2 Enemey Cyclocross franken build; Redline D660 29er, Volpe SS Cross
    Posts
    3,694
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For 1400 I'd get a trail oriented hardtail. Probably 100mm of suspension, unless you can find something with 120. Make sure the frame has clearance for 2.3 inch tires as well.

    On the other hand there are deals out there. You may be able to get a 2000 dollar FS XC rig for 1400, but if we're talking msrps I think you'd be happier with hardtail. FS in that price range will work fine, but will have lower specs and be heavy.

    I'd say geo and travel affect climbing more than 1 or two pounds. Suspension design plays a huge role as well.

    All that said I'm personally sold on the 29 inch wheels, so I'm willing to make sacrifices in the area of suspension to get 'em. I was going to get a 26 inch FS XC rig, but now I think my next bike will either be a short travel (100mm) FS 29er or a hardtail 29er.

    The big wheels are nice on a hardtail because they roll over things well, but they're not suspension, just like steel isn't suspension. They have other cons too, such as weight. Not for everyone, I'm sure.
    Last edited by M_S; 06-03-08 at 08:31 PM.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    705
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hmm...I never thought of it like that before, but I guess the Dakota XC did sort of become the Dragon Comp...

    See if you can test ride a 29er, see how you like it...

  17. #17
    World's slowest cyclist.
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Londonderry, NH
    My Bikes
    Cannondale CAAD5 and Cannondale Rush
    Posts
    1,353
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A friend of mine rides a sub 25# hardtail and I ride a hefty over 30# full suspension. although the weight difference between the two bikes is obvious mine "rides" just as light as his over the trail (feels lighter in a way). The rear suspension makes most of the bike's weight "sprung" whereas most of a hardtail's weight is "unsprung". It's a heck of a lot more efficient to move sprung weight over rough terrain than it is to move unsprung weight.

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Eugene, OR
    My Bikes
    Jamis XLT 2.0, Kona Fire Mountain
    Posts
    564
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by kramnnim View Post
    Hmm...I never thought of it like that before, but I guess the Dakota XC did sort of become the Dragon Comp...

    See if you can test ride a 29er, see how you like it...
    I would say it became the dragon pro...the only differences are the bb7s instead of mechanical brakes and 853 instead of 651. I think I will try to test out a 29er though as they seem to be getting popular pretty quickly.

    I think I might be set on a FS now though, because I wasn't so much concerned about weight as I was about the hardtail handling descents, and most of the responses here seem to say that a race xc won't be great going down bumpy descents.

    Thanks everyone

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •