Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: xt cranks

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    25
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    xt cranks

    I am looking to upgrade my crankset on my rm 2003 slayer. I was thinking of going to xt crankset any suggestions on which one to go to the 2003 or the 2004. What is the benifit in the different size 170 mm to 180 mm. Or any is there any other suggestions for crankset for xc and dh use. thanks out

  2. #2
    ÖöÖöÖöÖöÖö Dannihilator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Annandale, NJ.
    My Bikes
    2014 Surly Steamroller, 1977 Puch Pathfinder
    Posts
    18,789
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Why bother, the cranks on the 2003 Slayer are far superior than xt cranks.
    Strike like an eagle and sacrifice the dove.
    Words and Stuff.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    25
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the bottom bracket that came with my slayer only lasted about 250 miles maybe does anyone have any suggestions one what crank to go to my bike came with race face isis

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    895
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sounds like the tech that set-up the bike did a poor job. Even the cheapest BB should last longer than 250 miles. If that is all you got then you should be able to get it replaced under warranty.

    That said, I use an '03 XT crankset and think it is just fine. Have scarred my shins many times on them and hasn't hurt them at all. They are as good as new and I now wear shin armor.

    As far as length goes, 170mm is the crankarm length and is generally for us smaller of leg folks (31" inseam here). There are several threads here that will tell you about getting the correct crankarm length. Do a search on same and you will come up with a dozen and more info than you ever wanted to know.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    25
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    thanks for the input that is what i thought they did warranty the part with the same one and I did not want it to happen again.

  6. #6
    Less than Zero Mace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Dirty Jersey
    Posts
    79
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i have a set of 180mm holzfeller that i upgraded from a set of 170mm hussefelt - they use isis spline. both cranks are great. i just needed longer crank arms - and i'm a short rider (5'5") just like the feel of the longer arms. if i'm not mistaken, you get more leverage
    '03 Ironhorse SGS Expert/Truvativ Holzfeller Cranks/K-Rad Tires/Manitou Metel RP/Avid BB7 Mechs

    '94 GT Karakoram/Manitou Black Comp/Mavic 517/All XT 9 Speed/Selle Italia Saddle/Michelin City Tires/Weyless:) DFR - 40 Riser Bar/CNC 4 Bolt Stem/Stomper Pedals -stolen- :(

    '05 Scattante R-550

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    England
    Posts
    12,248
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Long cranks enable you to turn larger gears at a slower cadence. With small cranks, you can turn a smaller gear, faster. In both cases, you are outputting the same amount of power and going the same speed. Cranks do not increase your power.
    Long and short are relative terms. The "normal" size depends on your leg length. You also need a crank which will not interfere with the front wheels, and which gives sufficient cornering clearance.
    For ave male (5'10), a 170-175 is about right for off-road riding.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •