Is there a downside to buying an older model?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Is there a downside to buying an older model?
There is a very attractive 2003 Gary Fisher Mt. Tam 2-9 on sale for $800 at my LBS. I am looking for a versatile bike and this seems like a really good deal. Is there a downside, however, to buying an older model, though still new?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Novi, Michigan
Posts: 459
Bikes: Trek '06 2100ZR, 7.5FX, '05 Fuel EX8
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The only thing older about it is the technology. I would compare to some later or new models because most companies trickle down their technology or improvements. The price spread might not be as much as you think and you could have a later model for only $100 or $200 more but would also be worth more if you decided to sell it in the future for not being as old.
#5
unofficial roadie
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Out in the woods you see
Posts: 1,440
Bikes: 2004 Marin bobcat trail, 2006 trek fuel ex7, 2007 iron horse road bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
people always say buy the newest bike technology and how great it is.. Then after the next year model comes out they admit there were problems with it and that you should buy the new newest technology.. I'm not drinking that kool-aid. I would however stick with a bike withing the last 3 or 4 years, just for better parts availability and compatability.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,693
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The fork may be a little dated (don't know what comes on it). But in terms of drivetrain, quality stuff from then is still pretty nice now. Also, that's recent enough that it should be built around an 80 or 100mm fork, so replacing it with something a little mroe modern shouldn't be much of a problem, if need be.
But it's brand new. Should be fine. What components doe sit have, out of curiosity?
But it's brand new. Should be fine. What components doe sit have, out of curiosity?
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
But it's brand new. Should be fine. What components doe sit have, out of curiosity?[/QUOTE]
It is pretty much all shimano xt, I forget what shocks it comes with
It is pretty much all shimano xt, I forget what shocks it comes with
#9
World's slowest cyclist.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Londonderry, NH
Posts: 1,353
Bikes: Cannondale CAAD5 and Cannondale Rush
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
people always say buy the newest bike technology and how great it is.. Then after the next year model comes out they admit there were problems with it and that you should buy the new newest technology.. I'm not drinking that kool-aid. I would however stick with a bike withing the last 3 or 4 years, just for better parts availability and compatability.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 274
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a bike with 2001 xtr, and it works great. I honestly can't tell much difference at all between components from different years.