Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Different thinking; suspension on hardtails without geometry change in compression

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Different thinking; suspension on hardtails without geometry change in compression

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-25-08, 04:56 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Different thinking; suspension on hardtails without geometry change in compression

Hello i've started this thread as i'm interested on getting some feedback on an idea for bike design i've got.

I'm an engineering graduate, currently taking an MA in design, and at the moment i'm designing a bike which uses a front linkage desige to reduce the effects of fork compression on the steering geometry of a rigid framed bike, and i'm looking for advice, comments, or any other feedback. The design as i have it on paper for a 90mm travel fork reduces the change in headtube angle from about 5 degrees to about .25of a degree.

This sounds like a good thing as it will mean an almost constant trail (difference between effective headtube line contact point, and where the tyre actually touches the ground) give or take about 1mm, so the design should have far more predictable handling characteristics, as currently frames designed for 100mm forks have 70 ish head angles so that they reach the 'sweet spot in handling (typically seen as a 73 ish head angle) at around 60mm of the way through their travel, and of course the trail is varying all the time through the angle change from 70-75 ish degree headtube angle. Essentially the geometry is in almost constant compromise. Through adjusting it throughout the travel you could get a constant 73 degrees, therefore to my mind better handling.

Do people agree with this? i don't know if someone's made this and people just couldn't get on with the handling or simillar?

One knock on effect of the change in headtube angle is wheelbase elongation. Over a typical fork compression (without correcting headtube angle) the effective wheelbase lengthens by approx 20mm (for 90mm travel fork) due to the frame rocking forward. With a constant headtube angle there is the rocking forward and the effect of correcting the headtuvbe angle, therefore resulting in a +35mm wheelbase change over the full 90mm. does this sound like a problem? in theory longer wheelbase = more stability, but as the wheelbase is only extending forward the centry of mass of the bike will effectively shift backward slightly, but then this may well be compensated for if the rider rocks forward slightly as their handlebars drop.

There are a fair number of complicated factors at work, all of which i would welcome comments on, but the other important question is do mountain bikers need/want this?
tonyharker is offline  
Old 07-25-08, 06:31 AM
  #2  
.
 
ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Summit of Lee
Posts: 10,939

Bikes: Hecklah

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Why did you start this thread with 2 different titles?
ed is offline  
Old 07-25-08, 06:41 AM
  #3  
my brain hurts!
 
fosmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oak Knoll
Posts: 680

Bikes: Numerous bicycles.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i've always tried to ride "Platform" forks that resist compression unless you hit a bump. Manitou R7 with SPV (now Absolute damping) Fox X series forks with inertia valve, or Rock Shox with Floodgate. If you have a fork with lockout and blowoff threshold adjustment, it will have the same results.

I do hate it when you are diving into a turn, the fork compresses under load and steepens the head angle.
fosmith is offline  
Old 07-25-08, 06:55 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
sorry it came up with an error when i initially tried to post, then i just read through and again, before retrying to post, and thought i might try and use a more interesting sounding title.. did try to remove one, but couldn't see how, fortunately the admins have taken care of it. thanks for pointing it out. t
tonyharker is offline  
Old 07-25-08, 06:59 AM
  #5  
.
 
ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Summit of Lee
Posts: 10,939

Bikes: Hecklah

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Still though...I'm interested to hear your remark to my post in the other thread.
ed is offline  
Old 07-25-08, 07:05 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thanks for the reply fosmith, do you think there might be advantages , eg. bumpy corner? to the system, or do you feel everyhting is adequately taken care of by platform systems? i've tended to ride rigid untill recently, and the feeling of steering geometry changing (in fast cornering, or bumpy line changes) i still find pretty unnerving (although going from 0-5 inches of travel is likely to feel a little weird), and i just wondered if this might be a good solution.

The other question that popped into my mind was whether being do used to the geometry change with suspension might make a constant head angle feel weird, it could have advantages yet just be too different for people to feel it was worth getting used to.

any thoughts greatly appreciated.
tonyharker is offline  
Old 07-25-08, 07:31 AM
  #7  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
oops, sorry turns out other thread is still there, just a little lower down the list... embarassing.
tonyharker is offline  
Old 07-25-08, 08:52 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
rankin116's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: ChapelBorro NC
Posts: 4,126
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 98 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ask to have them merged.
rankin116 is offline  
Old 07-25-08, 10:50 AM
  #9  
Lost in the Black Hills
 
mx_599's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,725
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
mx_599 is offline  
Old 07-25-08, 09:05 PM
  #10  
unofficial roadie
 
DirtPedalerB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Out in the woods you see
Posts: 1,440

Bikes: 2004 Marin bobcat trail, 2006 trek fuel ex7, 2007 iron horse road bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm trying to think how this would work , maybe some kind of shock loaded headtube that compresses backward as the fork compresses preserving the bar height and angle.. I may be way off, how does it work?
DirtPedalerB is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.