Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 55
  1. #1
    26r grudgemonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    merica
    My Bikes
    road, hardtail, fs, streetbeater
    Posts
    273
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Lance's New Tricked-Out 23 lb Race MTB

    http://www.velonews.com/article/8130...-23-pound-full



    This year at the Leadville 100 he looks like a serious threat on that sick 23 lb machine.

  2. #2
    Senior Member gfrance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    1,757
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Just read this on the site, and thought I'd post here....beat me to it!!!

    I just wish Floyd was doing the race this year too. Don't know why really, but I'm just curious to see who of the two would come out ahead. Landis has the skills, but Armstrong probably has the fitness.

    Sweet bike though.

  3. #3
    "I'm OK!" dminor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The 509
    My Bikes
    1971 Suzuki TS125/factory race kit/AHRMA-legal; 1969 Suzuki TS250/factory race kit; 1967 Suzuki K-15 Hillbilly Trail 80; 1977 Yamaha IT175; 1964 VanTech Scrambler racing frame
    Posts
    12,060
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Looks flexy.

    I think he should have stuck with a hardtail - - it would make him a better off-road rider.





  4. #4
    26r grudgemonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    merica
    My Bikes
    road, hardtail, fs, streetbeater
    Posts
    273
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dminor View Post
    Looks flexy.

    I think he should have stuck with a hardtail - - it would make him a better off-road rider.




    Also, I think that I read a BF scientist concluded that certain paint colors can actually make a bike faster...

  5. #5
    Nitro xcracer13's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    canyon lake, tx
    My Bikes
    Salsa
    Posts
    829
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    so I guess Treks new bike isn't 21 pounds after all...
    www.teamnrc.com
    When you feel good, racing is hard. When you're not good, its worse.. - Sager

  6. #6
    Official Website Waterboy born2bahick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    a lot
    Posts
    3,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Carbon has no place on the trails!

  7. #7
    "I'm OK!" dminor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The 509
    My Bikes
    1971 Suzuki TS125/factory race kit/AHRMA-legal; 1969 Suzuki TS250/factory race kit; 1967 Suzuki K-15 Hillbilly Trail 80; 1977 Yamaha IT175; 1964 VanTech Scrambler racing frame
    Posts
    12,060
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^^ That's right . . . stuff leaves a big 'carbon footprint' where it explodes.

  8. #8
    DNPAIMFB pinkrobe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cowtown, AB
    My Bikes
    Titus El Guapo, Misfit diSSent, Cervelo Soloist Carbon, Wabi Lightning, et al.
    Posts
    4,655
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It comes with a slurpee holder! Nice...
    Proud Member of the HHCMF
    '06 Cervelo Soloist Carbon | '09 Titus El Guapo | '09 Misfit diSSent | '09 Wabi Lightning

  9. #9
    Too Much Crazy
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    NY
    My Bikes
    Ventana El Comandante, Lynskey ridgeline, EWR OWB, GF HKEK, Gunnar Roadie, Spesh E5 S Works, Quintana Roo Kilo, Intense BMX Cruiser
    Posts
    3,299
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    damn that seatmast is ugly.......

  10. #10
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    2010 Jamis Parker, 2005 Jamis Komodo, 1998 Jamis Komodo, 198? Raleigh Pointe, 1978 Schwinn Super Le Tour 12.2
    Posts
    10,930
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by grudgemonkey View Post
    This year at the Leadville 100 he looks like a serious threat on that sick 23 lb machine.
    I can only assume that the Leadville 100 is another "groomed NORBA" course that begs for the technical prowess of a hardcore roadie.

    I'll bet that the bike is sitting in the middle of the rocky technical section of the course in that very picture.
    Last edited by ed; 08-05-08 at 01:04 PM.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by chelboed View Post
    I can only assume that the Leadville 100 is another "groomed NORBA" course that begs for the technical prowess of a hardcore roadie.
    I guess you should read a little more into the race... You must be an expert on all things you know nothing about....

  12. #12
    my brain hurts! fosmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Oak Knoll
    My Bikes
    Numerous bicycles.
    Posts
    679
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i may be wrong, but i'm pretty sure armstrong got 3rd at the mt snow national finals in 99 or 98... its not groomed

  13. #13
    Senior Member trek1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Novi, Michigan
    My Bikes
    Trek '06 2100ZR, 7.5FX, '05 Fuel EX8
    Posts
    459
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by xcracer13 View Post
    so I guess Treks new bike isn't 21 pounds after all...
    If the seat pack, bottle cage and computer weigh 2 lbs. then the bike would be 21 lbs. afterall.

    "Coates said both bikes were under 23 pounds with seat pack, bottle cages and computer. Coates told VeloNews on Monday that Armstrong has settled on the Trek."
    Fuel EX8(05') 2100 ZR(06') 7.5 FX(06')=Best $ I ever spent =~)
    Mavic-Time-Sidi-PI-Primal-Giro-CamelBak-Bike Eye-Bell-Bandana-Park-eGel-PBJ's

    The bitter taste of poor quality far out lasts the sweet taste of a low price.

  14. #14
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    2010 Jamis Parker, 2005 Jamis Komodo, 1998 Jamis Komodo, 198? Raleigh Pointe, 1978 Schwinn Super Le Tour 12.2
    Posts
    10,930
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bbgobie View Post
    I guess you should read a little more into the race... You must be an expert on all things you know nothing about....
    So instead of talking down to me, why not educate us all on how "technically challenging" XC racing has become?

    Same thing wherever you go..."Oh just make the course longer for the more advanced riders...it's technical enough. Heck we got several 6" diameter logs strewn across the singletrack here and there."


    (BTW...every picture of that course that I could dig up was laughable. It's like XC racing has become road racing on dirt...cross field here...paved road there...oh wait, some singletrack...no rocks peeking out of the face of it though...& God has forbidden any drop larger than a curb)
    Last edited by ed; 08-05-08 at 01:20 PM.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    26
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by chelboed View Post
    I can only assume that the Leadville 100 is another "groomed NORBA" course that begs for the technical prowess of a hardcore roadie.

    I'll bet that the bike is sitting in the middle of the rocky technical section of the course in that very picture.
    Great, another clueless mtb vs roadie post. . One thing I've learned people that make statements like that arent fast enough for the "groomed" trails. The other thing I've learnt is that guys that go fast on the groomed trails go equally as fast on the supposed "non groomed trails. Speed kills, for those that cant go fast, they complain.

    BTW, its called mountain bike "racing", which implies the ability to go fast for a period of time. Not who can ride over logs and trees. I believe thats call trials riding.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    southern oregon
    Posts
    2,631
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cat1 View Post
    Great, another clueless mtb vs roadie post. . One thing I've learned people that make statements like that arent fast enough for the "groomed" trails. The other thing I've learnt is that guys that go fast on the groomed trails go equally as fast on the supposed "non groomed trails. Speed kills, for those that cant go fast, they complain.

    BTW, its called mountain bike "racing", which implies the ability to go fast for a period of time. Not who can ride over logs and trees. I believe thats call trials riding.

    And yet another "clueless mtb vs roadie post"

  17. #17
    "I'm OK!" dminor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The 509
    My Bikes
    1971 Suzuki TS125/factory race kit/AHRMA-legal; 1969 Suzuki TS250/factory race kit; 1967 Suzuki K-15 Hillbilly Trail 80; 1977 Yamaha IT175; 1964 VanTech Scrambler racing frame
    Posts
    12,060
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cat1 View Post
    BTW, its called mountain bike "racing", which implies the ability to go fast for a period of time. Not who can ride over logs and trees. I believe thats call trials riding.
    Logs, trees, rocks . . . all of that can and should make up racing a mountain bike racing on a real mountain. I agree with Ed that current-day XC races are little more than dirt-surface road crits, with the most laughable being shorttrack. Even when shorttrack is held on a real mountain, it is usually a crit held on the access roads that surround the ski resort village; hardly mountain biking.

    A mountain bike race should be better-defined as a measure of one's ability to carry speed in a somewhat-innordinate amounts for whatever the given trail condition (i.e. - racing over varied mountainous terrain).

  18. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    33
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by chelboed View Post
    I'll bet that the bike is sitting in the middle of the rocky technical section of the course in that very picture.
    I care nothing for the outcome of your MTB vs Roadie debate, but damn, that was funny.

  19. #19
    Dances With Cars TRaffic Jammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    My Bikes
    TBL Onyx Pro(ss converted), Pake SS (starting to look kinda pimped)
    Posts
    10,527
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The seat mast just looks like some bad waiting to happen.

  20. #20
    Too Much Crazy
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    NY
    My Bikes
    Ventana El Comandante, Lynskey ridgeline, EWR OWB, GF HKEK, Gunnar Roadie, Spesh E5 S Works, Quintana Roo Kilo, Intense BMX Cruiser
    Posts
    3,299
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dminor View Post
    Logs, trees, rocks . . . all of that can and should make up racing a mountain bike racing on a real mountain. I agree with Ed that current-day XC races are little more than dirt-surface road crits, with the most laughable being shorttrack. Even when shorttrack is held on a real mountain, it is usually a crit held on the access roads that surround the ski resort village; hardly mountain biking.

    A mountain bike race should be better-defined as a measure of one's ability to carry speed in a somewhat-innordinate amounts for whatever the given trail condition
    (i.e. - racing over varied mountainous terrain).
    varied as in uphill and downhill ?

  21. #21
    "I'm OK!" dminor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The 509
    My Bikes
    1971 Suzuki TS125/factory race kit/AHRMA-legal; 1969 Suzuki TS250/factory race kit; 1967 Suzuki K-15 Hillbilly Trail 80; 1977 Yamaha IT175; 1964 VanTech Scrambler racing frame
    Posts
    12,060
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by C Law View Post
    varied as in uphill and downhill ?
    Haha, you caught me there. I meant to qualify that as XC mountain bike racing. I will add, though, that some of the most challenging and unique downhill races I've competed in had some demanding little uphill secttions thrown in.

  22. #22
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    2010 Jamis Parker, 2005 Jamis Komodo, 1998 Jamis Komodo, 198? Raleigh Pointe, 1978 Schwinn Super Le Tour 12.2
    Posts
    10,930
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cat1 View Post
    people that make statements like that arent fast enough for the "groomed" trails.
    Yup...got me blanketed right I generally stick to bike paths. Only paved ones now that I've sold my 5" dually. Whew...back when I had that thing...I could tear me up some gravel roads!!!

    The participation would increase exponentially if they'd race on actual MTB terrain...I'm not saying "super gnarly" stuff, just something that my bike was actually designed to ride on. Of course then the Gnar-core roadie-crit'ters would drop out b/c they wouldn't be able to handle the course.

    Seems like they dumb down our local trails every year before the races so the beginners can handle it. Instead...they could just race a different loop than the experts instead of just doing fewer laps. I agree more laps are required...but why more laps over "dirt pavement" instead of more laps over MTB terrain?
    Last edited by ed; 08-05-08 at 03:44 PM.

  23. #23
    tilt head to right Alpha52's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    on your left
    My Bikes
    Trek, Specialized, Atala, Kona
    Posts
    145
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by pinkrobe View Post
    It comes with a slurpee holder! Nice...
    Yea, but it is a 17 gram carbon fiber slurpee holder....I bought one at Performance for $19.99. It says, "slurp strong" on the side...

  24. #24
    26r grudgemonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    merica
    My Bikes
    road, hardtail, fs, streetbeater
    Posts
    273
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by chelboed View Post
    So instead of talking down to me, why not educate us all on how "technically challenging" XC racing has become?

    Same thing wherever you go..."Oh just make the course longer for the more advanced riders...it's technical enough. Heck we got several 6" diameter logs strewn across the singletrack here and there."



    (BTW...every picture of that course that I could dig up was laughable. It's like XC racing has become road racing on dirt...cross field here...paved road there...oh wait, some singletrack...no rocks peeking out of the face of it though...& God has forbidden any drop larger than a curb)
    Basically, that is the definition of XC. Hardpack, dirt, gravel, some pavement. Obstacles can be few, they can be many. XC does not have to be technical to be XC, it just has to be on dirt.

    Now what happens when you throw in technical drops, big logs, creek crossings, big roots on steep uphill sections? ... the riders with the skills gain a huge advantage. At a recent XC race I watched some of the most fit and fastest riders lose a lot of time when they had to dismount. I also see them lose time when the "slower peddlers" bomb at sick speeds through the fast twisty downhill sections.

    Are races more interesting when the course is more technical? Yes.
    Is it any less intense or less competitive when it's not as technical? No.

  25. #25
    Official Website Waterboy born2bahick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    a lot
    Posts
    3,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What I see in XC races is, if the course gets very technical, it is often faster to dismount and run the section. (especially long technical climbs) At least at my skill level. Many times I've seen my computer at 2 mph on steep, rocky, technical climbs. I can run the section with bike on shoulder at 5mph. My observation being that even if the xc race course were more difficult, it doesn't mean more skill would be the deciding factor in the finish of the race.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •