Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 35
  1. #1
    Overacting because I can SpongeDad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The Mean Streets of Bethesda, MD
    My Bikes
    Merlin Agilis, Trek 1500
    Posts
    4,551
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Carbon vs Alu for FS bike

    Other than a bit of weight savings, for a full suspension bike is there any reason to go with a carbon fiber frame?

    Given the shocks and fat tires, does the CF actually add anything in terms of ride quality?
    “Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm." (Churchill)

    "I am a courageous cyclist." (SpongeDad)

  2. #2
    Old School Rad mtnbiker66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The old Mountains
    My Bikes
    Blur LT
    Posts
    8,212
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It has been asaid that Carbon will explode on cantact with a trail.
    Like a circus monkey on a stolen Harley......

  3. #3
    Nitro xcracer13's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    canyon lake, tx
    My Bikes
    Salsa
    Posts
    829
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Little bit more rigid. Go to your fully. put one pedal down while your off the bike and kind of kick down on the pedal. You'll be able to see your BB move to the side a bit. The carbon reduces it a bit.
    www.teamnrc.com
    When you feel good, racing is hard. When you're not good, its worse.. - Sager

  4. #4
    unofficial roadie DirtPedalerB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Out in the woods you see
    My Bikes
    2004 Marin bobcat trail, 2006 trek fuel ex7, 2007 iron horse road bike
    Posts
    1,444
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by xcracer13 View Post
    Little bit more rigid. Go to your fully. put one pedal down while your off the bike and kind of kick down on the pedal. You'll be able to see your BB move to the side a bit. The carbon reduces it a bit.
    I would think that would have more to do with the rear linkages on the bike, or frame design rather than material. but you may be right, I'm not sure.
    I only pedal uphill.

  5. #5
    use your best eye kenhill3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Olympia, Washington
    My Bikes
    '75 Bertin, '93 Parkpre Team 925, '04 Kona King Kikapu, '05 Bianchi Vigorelli
    Posts
    3,054
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by SpongeDad View Post
    does the CF actually add anything in terms of ride quality?
    Yes, a very expensive ride quality. And, if you scratch the frame at all, it will catastrophically fail.
    "I tell you, We are here on earth to fart around, and don't let anybody tell you any different." - Kurt Vonnegut jr.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    southern oregon
    Posts
    2,631
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DirtPedalerB View Post
    I would think that would have more to do with the rear linkages on the bike, or frame design rather than material.
    Somewhat, but most of what he is describing is tire and wheel flex.

  7. #7
    DNPAIMFB pinkrobe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cowtown, AB
    My Bikes
    Titus El Guapo, Misfit diSSent, Cervelo Soloist Carbon, Wabi Lightning, et al.
    Posts
    4,654
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mcoine View Post
    Somewhat, but most of what he is describing is tire and wheel flex.
    True dat. The overall design will make a significant difference. Didn't one of the Fisher bikes forego the BB pivot in favour of flexible carbon chainstays?
    Proud Member of the HHCMF
    '06 Cervelo Soloist Carbon | '09 Titus El Guapo | '09 Misfit diSSent | '09 Wabi Lightning

  8. #8
    bac
    bac is offline
    Senior Member bac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    My Bikes
    Too many to list!
    Posts
    7,487
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by SpongeDad View Post
    Other than a bit of weight savings, for a full suspension bike is there any reason to go with a carbon fiber frame?
    On a FS bike .... a difference?

    You will feel NO difference - and there will be virtually NO difference. The BIG volume tires alone would negate any difference in feel/ride - let alone the suspension!

    ... Brad

  9. #9
    one less horse cryptid01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    East Jesus NY
    My Bikes
    are better than yours
    Posts
    5,596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I subscribe to the school of thought that states that a full suspension frame should be as stiff as possible, especially laterally. The "ride quality" should be dictated by the shock, not the frame material.

    Either of the materials you've listed can be built to be extremely stiff. I find that the suspension design has as much to do with this as the frame material.

  10. #10
    Overacting because I can SpongeDad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The Mean Streets of Bethesda, MD
    My Bikes
    Merlin Agilis, Trek 1500
    Posts
    4,551
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I guess what I'm thinking is that a good Alu frame with good components is a better value than a CF bike with lesser components at same price point. I love cycling and I'm willing to drop $ on a something worthwhile, but I hate spending money for not much gain.
    “Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm." (Churchill)

    "I am a courageous cyclist." (SpongeDad)

  11. #11
    Senior nonmember Temeraroius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia
    My Bikes
    Cannondale Rush 400 (Used to have an FSR XC)
    Posts
    328
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It depends on how rugged the bike is. Obviously a CF freeride bike is a big no no. You kinda of have to baby CF bikes so if you are riding 80mm of travel XC type stuff then sure CF is an improvement but in my opinion, having something like a CF enduro is almost silly, although I do trust specialized's design ability.

  12. #12
    In search of moar cowbell dminor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The 509
    My Bikes
    1971 Suzuki TS125/ factory race kit/AHRMA-legal; 1969 Suzuki TS250/factory race kit; 1967 Suzuki K-15 Hillbilly Trail 80; 1977 Yamaha IT175; 1964 VanTech Scrambler racing frame
    Posts
    12,144
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Temeraroius View Post
    Obviously a CF freeride bike is a big no no. . . .
    How often is this fallacy going to be regurgitated before it can finally be put to rest?


  13. #13
    one less horse cryptid01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    East Jesus NY
    My Bikes
    are better than yours
    Posts
    5,596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dminor View Post
    How often is this fallacy going to be regurgitated before it can finally be put to rest?


    The fact that you usually post a different picture every time is appreciated, however.

  14. #14
    Generic Title ProFail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    My Bikes
    2008 Trek Fuel EX7, 2007 Trek 1600, 2007 Eastern Warthog
    Posts
    1,927
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Temeraroius View Post
    Obviously a CF freeride bike is a big no no.
    Nope. Fell into the same trap as me.

    CF is plenty strong (they use it in aircraft applications....), but stuff like rocks hitting it will f it up.
    Generic Joke

  15. #15
    Senior nonmember Temeraroius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Philadelphia
    My Bikes
    Cannondale Rush 400 (Used to have an FSR XC)
    Posts
    328
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I was more saying that due to the rugged terrain you are around and the type of things that would be scratching/hitting your frame. I know that the CF can take the stress of the big hits, but also I mean look at how much tubing is on the bike that D posted. Not trying to start an argument because you probably know way more than I do, I'm just saying.

  16. #16
    Overacting because I can SpongeDad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    The Mean Streets of Bethesda, MD
    My Bikes
    Merlin Agilis, Trek 1500
    Posts
    4,551
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    so in the world of Alu FS mtbs, what are the good values? I'd like something that I won't immediately want to upgrade, but I don't want to drop $4K either. Let's say in the $1500-2500 zone (or less if you think that's a stupid amount of money to pay).
    “Courage is going from failure to failure without losing enthusiasm." (Churchill)

    "I am a courageous cyclist." (SpongeDad)

  17. #17
    Duathlete indygreg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    1,157
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    CF is a fine material for such applications, but as others have said, it does not have the normal upside that is often praised about CF - vibration dampening. I do not think it makes a difference in this way for a hardtail either, but some will disagree. With 2" tires running 20psi the material of the frame is not going to make any difference as far as dampening.

    Again, I am not anti-CF. It is strong and tough enough for any MTB application. Some will never believe that and that is just fine. No one wants to ride a bike they do not have full trust in.
    Run, Bike, Run.

  18. #18
    Senior Member sparks_219's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Hamilton, Ontario
    My Bikes
    Rocky Mountain Instinct, Cannondale Six13, Cervelo One
    Posts
    646
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have an alum Rocky Mountain Element, and a carbon Trek Top Fuel. There is no difference in ride quality between the frames. Obviously they handle and climb a little differently, but from a vibration point of view, there is no difference.

  19. #19
    Official Website Waterboy born2bahick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    a lot
    Posts
    3,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by indygreg View Post
    I do not think it makes a difference in this way for a hardtail either, but some will disagree. With 2" tires running 20psi the material of the frame is not going to make any difference as far as dampening.
    Yep I disagree. My hardtail does exibit all the ride qualities carbon is noted for. WAy better than an aluminum hardtail. If that statement were true, the "Ti is Fly" and "steel is real" people would have a total meltdown!

  20. #20
    In search of moar cowbell dminor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The 509
    My Bikes
    1971 Suzuki TS125/ factory race kit/AHRMA-legal; 1969 Suzuki TS250/factory race kit; 1967 Suzuki K-15 Hillbilly Trail 80; 1977 Yamaha IT175; 1964 VanTech Scrambler racing frame
    Posts
    12,144
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by born2bahick View Post
    . . . "Ti is Fly" . . .
    Fly is fly.


  21. #21
    Official Website Waterboy born2bahick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    a lot
    Posts
    3,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^^ Give him a badge and a ***, He's the Flyway Patrol!

  22. #22
    Duathlete indygreg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    1,157
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by born2bahick View Post
    Yep I disagree. My hardtail does exibit all the ride qualities carbon is noted for. WAy better than an aluminum hardtail. If that statement were true, the "Ti is Fly" and "steel is real" people would have a total meltdown!
    Yep, I disagree with you. Steel and Ti both have a great deal more flex to them and you notice that on a hardtail for sure. But that is not dampening, which is what I am talking about. Carbon can be made just as stiff as Alum and the main difference that most will talk about is that carbon takes out a lot of the vibration that comes from riding (mainly road bikes, 120psi and things like chip and seal). With 20psi 2" wide tires none of that type vibration is going to get to the frame to be dampened. It just is not. It goes away on a road bike at 50psi (not that anyone would want to ride at the pressure).

    Steel and Ti both will flex in a number of directions and you can feel that for sure. I remember when I went from a steel BMX bike to an alum (PK Ripper as I recall) frame in my youth and I hated how it road, so I agree there is a big difference in that way. But it has nothing to do with vibration dampening.
    Run, Bike, Run.

  23. #23
    Official Website Waterboy born2bahick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    a lot
    Posts
    3,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by indygreg View Post
    Yep, I disagree with you. Steel and Ti both have a great deal more flex to them and you notice that on a hardtail for sure. But that is not dampening, which is what I am talking about. Carbon can be made just as stiff as Alum and the main difference that most will talk about is that carbon takes out a lot of the vibration that comes from riding (mainly road bikes, 120psi and things like chip and seal). With 20psi 2" wide tires none of that type vibration is going to get to the frame to be dampened. It just is not. It goes away on a road bike at 50psi (not that anyone would want to ride at the pressure).

    Steel and Ti both will flex in a number of directions and you can feel that for sure. I remember when I went from a steel BMX bike to an alum (PK Ripper as I recall) frame in my youth and I hated how it road, so I agree there is a big difference in that way. But it has nothing to do with vibration dampening.
    Sorry your wrong. I ride a carbon hardtail. Tubeless with less than 20 PSI. The dampening properties of the carbon frame is very noticeable.

  24. #24
    Te mortuo heres tibi sim? scrublover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    East coast
    My Bikes
    hardtail, squishy, fixed roadie, fixed crosser
    Posts
    3,485
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by SpongeDad View Post
    so in the world of Alu FS mtbs, what are the good values? I'd like something that I won't immediately want to upgrade, but I don't want to drop $4K either. Let's say in the $1500-2500 zone (or less if you think that's a stupid amount of money to pay).

    You've got to give a bit more info. What kind of riding/trails? You wanting some sort of race bike, a general trail bike, something bigger/slacker? What?
    I believe the clouds in my coffee more than the weatherman on t.v.

  25. #25
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    11
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by indygreg View Post
    But that is not dampening, which is what I am talking about.
    You were talking about getting a bike wet?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •