Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

Trek Sizing question (sorry)

Search
Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Trek Sizing question (sorry)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-08, 07:50 PM
  #1  
Its Freakin HammerTime!!!
Thread Starter
 
C_Heath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Off the back lol
Posts: 2,375

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix and Giant AnthemX

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Trek Sizing question (sorry)

Thanks for the help but I ride mostly road and want to get back into some dirt. Im 5 foot 9 inches tall with a 30 " inseam. Will a Trek 6500 Disk fit me if its a 19.5" bike?

I go by cm on the road and ride a 54. Thanks for the help in advance.

Chris
C_Heath is offline  
Old 10-21-08, 07:52 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
santiago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Posts: 4,510

Bikes: 2005 Kona Blast; 2005 Turner Flux, 2006 Felt F3C

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You'll only truly know by sitting on the bike, but on paper that sounds too big. You'd probably fit a 17" or Medium bike. I'm 5'9" with a 32" inseam and ride a 17"/Medium.
santiago is offline  
Old 10-21-08, 08:22 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
deraltekluge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,195

Bikes: Kona Cinder Cone, Sun EZ-3 AX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
According to the Trek site, the 6500 comes in the following sizes: 15.5, 17.5, 18.5, 19.5, 21.5"

The 17.5" and 18.5" frames are both called "medium". The 19.5" frame is called "large". At 5'9", you are a bit on the short side of medium height. Trek calls their 54cm road bikes "small".

You might read this: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/frame-sizing.html

But, ultimately, the only way you're really going to find out which bike fits you will be to try them out.

Last edited by deraltekluge; 10-21-08 at 08:28 PM.
deraltekluge is offline  
Old 10-21-08, 08:40 PM
  #4  
Its Freakin HammerTime!!!
Thread Starter
 
C_Heath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Off the back lol
Posts: 2,375

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix and Giant AnthemX

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Thats what I thought but I wanted to check with the pros. I just found a relative with one ridden twice for cheap. I may buy it just to resell it.

Thanks for the help.
C_Heath is offline  
Old 10-22-08, 04:48 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
thehammerdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704

Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times in 226 Posts
Dood, I would say yes. I am about your size and fall at times betwen sizes. I just bought a LArge sized Gary Fisher, Iwas torn between the med & large...I teded to go smaller based uponold school Mt bike rules...I say get it Ya may need to change a stem. It will be alright..
thehammerdog is offline  
Old 10-22-08, 09:01 PM
  #6  
unofficial roadie
 
DirtPedalerB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Out in the woods you see
Posts: 1,440

Bikes: 2004 Marin bobcat trail, 2006 trek fuel ex7, 2007 iron horse road bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm 5'9" to 5'10 with around a 32" inseam and ride a 19.5 inch fuel .. a 2006 before the 18.5 was avalable.. I got some standover concerns, but I have an inch or 2 .. i installed a shorter stem which I like..

I's say 18.5 would be a good size ... but a 17.5 or 19.5 may also be workable.. leaning toward the 17.5 more than the 19.5 ...

I ride a 56cm road bike.. also had to shorten the stem on that one too. maybe just not used to it as I just got it.. I have a box of stems now though haha


edit .. the standover on the 19.5 is 30.6 inches which sounds too big, but I'd suspect your inseam is bigger unless you've shoved a book in your crotch to measure .. plus the shoes jack you up an inch.. and I think trek measures 12 inches from the seat tube so it'll slope down where you actuall stand over it. I'd buy it if it was cheap. throw a 75mm stem on and hit the trail. it may be hard to throw around, but you'll gain some stability as your more centered on the bike

when I was shopping for a hard tail the bike store guy eyeballed me and said 19.5. I didn't go with a trek then, but got a bike about that size a 17.5 center to center.

Last edited by DirtPedalerB; 10-22-08 at 09:10 PM.
DirtPedalerB is offline  
Old 10-23-08, 07:27 AM
  #7  
Fourth Degree Legend
 
junkyard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: American Gardens Building
Posts: 3,826

Bikes: 2005 Kona Cinder Cone & 2010 Cannondale SuperSix

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by thehammerdog
Dood, I would say yes. I am about your size and fall at times betwen sizes. I just bought a LArge sized Gary Fisher, Iwas torn between the med & large...I teded to go smaller based uponold school Mt bike rules...I say get it Ya may need to change a stem. It will be alright..
Dood, listen to this guy. He's never met you but thinks he is like you and bought a bike that is not a Trek. His advice is pure gold.
junkyard is offline  
Old 10-23-08, 07:46 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
thehammerdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704

Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times in 226 Posts
Nice digg buckaroo. Just trying to help. I see you are Batman fan ....well done, Is mommymaking your baba righ tnow?
thehammerdog is offline  
Old 10-23-08, 08:16 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
santiago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Posts: 4,510

Bikes: 2005 Kona Blast; 2005 Turner Flux, 2006 Felt F3C

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by thehammerdog
Nice digg buckaroo. Just trying to help. I see you are Batman fan ....well done, Is mommymaking your baba righ tnow?
He wrote the truth. The Gary Fisher hardtails are known to have a compact frame geometry so standover height is less of an issue than with other mountain bikes. Again, I'm making a general statement here and the OP will only truly know if the bike fits by sitting on it. Your advice of "Dood, I would say yes." without any caveats may leave the OP with an ill-fitting bike.
santiago is offline  
Old 10-23-08, 12:45 PM
  #10  
Creamy pack filling
 
stevemtbr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Nine Mile Falls, WA
Posts: 710

Bikes: Trek 8000, Co-Motion tandem, Co-motion Espresso, Yeti Cross, 9Zero7 Fat Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
I'm 5'10" and bought an 09 Trek 8000 last month. My inseam is 32" and the 18.5 fit me perfect but we did have to put a longer stem on it.
stevemtbr is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.