Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    156
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Carbon Scott Scale 30 vs alloy Scale 40 ?

    Why should i spend much more for the Carbon ? or be happy with the Scale 40 ?

    What is THE REAL benefit to buy Carbon over Alloy ? only few grams lighter and much more expensive ?

    thxalot

    Happy new year

  2. #2
    Official Website Waterboy born2bahick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    a lot
    Posts
    3,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ride quality, stiffness, power transfer.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    1,247
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    carbon tubes and rocks scare me....save your cash unless you are a serious racer

  4. #4
    Generic Title ProFail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    My Bikes
    2008 Trek Fuel EX7, 2007 Trek 1600, 2007 Eastern Warthog
    Posts
    1,927
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by merlin55 View Post
    carbon tubes and rocks scare me....save your cash unless you are a serious racer
    Generic Joke

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    156
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ride quality,

    how ?

    explain please ?

    thxalot

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    156
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Please help me is carbon bike just for series racers or ?

    is it just bling ,bling

  7. #7
    Official Website Waterboy born2bahick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    a lot
    Posts
    3,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't think it's just for racers, as I'm not a racer and have a carbon hardtail.
    If you have ever ridden a carbon road bike and compared the ride an aluminum road bike,
    then you know the difference. Although with mountain tires it's not as evident and I wouldn't list it as a huge selling point.
    I was just listing some answers to your initial question of why someone would choose a carbon frame over an aluminum frame.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    156
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thinking to buy Scale 35 over 40 ? worth it ?

    or just save the money and buy scale 40 ?

    thxalot

  9. #9
    Senior Member igoyippy4skippy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    fallbrook CA
    My Bikes
    Lemond Chambery, Giant OCR A0, scott scale 30, kona kikapu dlx, gary fisher rig
    Posts
    177
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a scott scale 30 carbon but I only use it for racing. First off the geometry is made for racing. The carbon, I find, does make a difference it ride quality. Well at least good carbon. If you are not going to race it I would not get a carbon hardtail as alloy frame would be more durable out on the trail.

    It does freak me out when I hear rocks bouncing off the carbon tubes. You don't get a "ding" sound like alloy but a thud like a plastic sound. My frame has held up and nowadays they have done wonders with carbon where GT is making carbon downhill bikes.

    If you were just racing beginner or sport and getting a carbon bike would be at the upper end of your budget i would go with the alloy frame. I am lucky that i have several bikes so I can just use my carbon scott just for racing.
    If you are not crashin you are not riding hard enough

  10. #10
    Generic Title ProFail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    My Bikes
    2008 Trek Fuel EX7, 2007 Trek 1600, 2007 Eastern Warthog
    Posts
    1,927
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This "OMG CARBON+ROCKS=FAILLZ" thing is starting to become bothersome. Rocks hitting an aluminum tube will do just as much damage as rocks hitting a carbon tube, which, to be honest isn't a lot of damage unless we're talking big rocks. If you're so concerned about downtube failure, buy a metal plate to cover it.


    The supposed "benefits" of carbon over aluminum are
    • Weight
    • Ride Quality (Vibration Dampening, which is moot on a mountain bike)
    • Stiffness, which is supposed to help with power transfer efficiency. Debatable.
    • Stiffness, which is supposed to help with flex when turning.
    • Bling
    Generic Joke

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    156
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    thxalot

  12. #12
    Official Website Waterboy born2bahick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    a lot
    Posts
    3,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Carbon isn't necessarily lighter than an aluminum frame. The motobecane fly, in aluminum or Ti, is as light as most carbon frames in the same price range. The M5 specialized S-works stumpy HT frame was extremly light, as were some of the GF and Trek High end Aluminum frames

  13. #13
    later free_pizza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    2,471
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Woods View Post
    thxalot
    That has to stop.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •