Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    need to go out and ride.. ruirui's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    My Bikes
    2011 Scott Addict R1
    Posts
    1,313
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    OK.. Here's my dilema... HELP ME...

    ok.. now i'm in a big dilema now. my lbs just told me that the hardrock sport is for $299 and the rockhopper is $399. the rockhopper seems to have better parts and fork. what should i do???

    which one would you choose???
    Rockhopper-Dream vs. Hardrock Sport-Dream

    please enlighten me... i'm stomped! both of them seem to be good deals. are both frames equal? i'm going to do some trails and small jumps here and there.

    rui

  2. #2
    DEADBEEF khuon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
    My Bikes
    1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
    Posts
    12,155
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ruirui
    please enlighten me... i'm stomped! both of them seem to be good deals. are both frames equal? i'm going to do some trails and small jumps here and there.
    As far as frame quality goes, yes they are equal. As far as components go, the Rockhopper has slightly better components but to be honest, I'm not sure you will notice the difference other than the fact that your wallet is now $100 lighter. Based on those two things, I'd go for the HardRock.

    However...

    You probably want to have a close look at the geometries. The Rockhopper is set up with a shorter top-tube but longer stem. It also has a shorter headtube and wheelbase. The fork offset is shorter too. This says to me that it's a tighter frame and probably meant for more aggressive riding. You'll want to consider that I think more than anything else. The HardRock's geometry is conducive to a slightly more upright position.
    1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte OCP Club Member
    "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122

  3. #3
    need to go out and ride.. ruirui's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    My Bikes
    2011 Scott Addict R1
    Posts
    1,313
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MERTON
    wait until you have more money and get a full suspension bike.
    no thanks.. i'm only like hardtails. but thanks for the suggestions.

  4. #4
    need to go out and ride.. ruirui's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    My Bikes
    2011 Scott Addict R1
    Posts
    1,313
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by khuon
    As far as frame quality goes, yes they are equal. As far as components go, the Rockhopper has slightly better components but to be honest, I'm not sure you will notice the difference other than the fact that your wallet is now $100 lighter. Based on those two things, I'd go for the HardRock.

    However...

    You probably want to have a close look at the geometries. The Rockhopper is set up with a shorter top-tube but longer stem. It also has a shorter headtube and wheelbase. The fork offset is shorter too. This says to me that it's a tighter frame and probably meant for more aggressive riding. You'll want to consider that I think more than anything else. The HardRock's geometry is conducive to a slightly more upright position.
    khuon... thanks for the suggestions. humm.. i didn't know the that the more upright geo is meant for aggressive riding. but yeah i'll keep that in mind. now i just have to go convince my wife that the rockhopper will be better choice. hehe

  5. #5
    DEADBEEF khuon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
    My Bikes
    1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
    Posts
    12,155
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ruirui
    khuon... thanks for the suggestions. humm.. i didn't know the that the more upright geo is meant for aggressive riding. but yeah i'll keep that in mind. now i just have to go convince my wife that the rockhopper will be better choice. hehe
    Actually I tend to think of it the opposite way. More upright to me means less aggressive but I guess one has to define "aggressive". Maybe I'm thinking old-school here but when someone says that a bike has a more aggressive geometry, that says "race" which tends to invoke images of lowered positioning. I suppose this was only true when speaking in terms relative to XC.
    1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte OCP Club Member
    "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122

  6. #6
    need to go out and ride.. ruirui's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    My Bikes
    2011 Scott Addict R1
    Posts
    1,313
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by khuon
    Actually I tend to think of it the opposite way. More upright to me means less aggressive but I guess one has to define "aggressive". Maybe I'm thinking old-school here but when someone says that a bike has a more aggressive geometry, that says "race" which tends to invoke images of lowered positioning. I suppose this was only true when speaking in terms relative to XC.
    humm.. i was thinking about that.. i think the more upright the geo is.. the more easier it is to ride. whereas the more angled geo would be more harder to ride? on my current rockhopper.. it's fairly easy to ride because i think it's more upright.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •