Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-01-09, 12:55 PM   #1
TimJ
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TimJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 1,955
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My new bike woes

So I'd been hanging on to a '98 OX platinum Trek 930 frame for a long time, finally got it powdercoated and built up, and now I realize the bike wasn't built for an 80mm fork. I just kinda assumed it was. I can't get a definitive answer but it's looking like it was built around either a 50mm or 65mm fork.

I've got the fork on it set to about 65mm and the handling seems all funky, so I'm guessing 50mm was the original spec, plus my new fork probably has a longer axle-to-crown length anyway. So tell me if it sounds like this would be the case w/ a longer fork- front end wants to lift up on steep climbs, front end wants to wash out cornering on descents, turning at slow speeds is weird in that after a point the wheel just wants to turn all the way (so turn the wheel a little and it's OK but then there's a spot once you hit it the wheel wants to flop over all the way), basically handling just kind of sucks. Part of it could be my tires but I can feel the thing wanting to wash out from under me with just about any kind of steering at speed.

So is this what I would expect from a bike by raising the front end? If so, is there a way to compensate for it like shorter stem, or longer stem, or lower bars... something I can fiddle with to see if I can use this sucker or not? I've already got different tires on the way, I want to try what I can without spending much more money to see if I can get it to work.

And yes, I'm super bummed. I thought I scored big-time getting a hot steel frame for $50... dammit.
__________________
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
TimJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-09, 01:04 PM   #2
HAMMER MAN
Semper Fidelis
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Bikes: Tiemeyer Road Bike & Ridley Domicles
Posts: 2,985
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Tim, what is the head angle?

if the head angle is a 70 degree try a 63mm fork

Last edited by HAMMER MAN; 04-01-09 at 01:21 PM.
HAMMER MAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-09, 01:45 PM   #3
TimJ
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TimJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 1,955
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
71/73 with a Rock Shox Indy S, which I've read some people say was 65mm, others 50mm, on either case the axle-to-crown would be shorter than the fork I have which is a psylo 80-125 that I have spaced to 65mm of travel.

So if the original spec was 50mm, and I've got my fork at 65mm, and let's say my fork axle-to-crown adds another 5-10mm, maybe I've got a 70, 69.5 degree headtube now? Doesn't sound like much but this bike handles like crap.
__________________
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
TimJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-09, 01:54 PM   #4
TimJ
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
TimJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 1,955
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Alright, I found a few other mentions of the Rock Shox Indy S being a 50mm fork.

So this kind of sucks.
__________________
fun facts: Psychopaths have trouble understanding abstract concepts.
"Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria."
TimJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:29 PM.