Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 34
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    what is the next best thing to buy for lightening your bike besides frame and rims?

    I am looking for things to upgrade to lighten my bike besides frame and rims?

  2. #2
    use your best eye kenhill3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Olympia, Washington
    My Bikes
    '75 Bertin, '93 Parkpre Team 925, '04 Kona King Kikapu, '05 Bianchi Vigorelli
    Posts
    3,054
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Tires. Fork.
    "I tell you, We are here on earth to fart around, and don't let anybody tell you any different." - Kurt Vonnegut jr.

  3. #3
    motovation frankenmike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Dover, NH
    My Bikes
    rigid 29er moto, s-works stumpjumper fsr,black fixie,masi roadbike, ugly old hardrock commuter
    Posts
    1,249
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Light tires, as kenhill suggests, are perhaps the biggest bang for your buck. Cranks, fork, and seatpost after that.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Missoula, MT
    My Bikes
    Giant TCX 1 touring conversion
    Posts
    130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Carbon fork (a good one will run around 1.6-1.8 lbs, I wouldn't go lighter than that.) or tack on another .25 or so pounds for a decent steel fork.

    Go tubeless using a conversion kit ala Stan's and a set of good quality medium lightweight tires. Avoid the weight of UST specific tires and tubes.

    There isn't much weight to be saved in the seatpost, but a lightweight seatpost/saddle combination can save 0.5 pound.

    Pedals. There can be as much as 0.5 pound difference between the clip/platform type and a dedicated clipless pedal. This makes a difference, as you are expending energy to rotate them all the time. Expect to spend $$$ to save weight here, though.

    V-brakes are lighter than discs. They don't stop quite as well. IME this is not a worthwhile compromise.

    Everything else pretty much gets eaten by the 'weight vs. durability vs. price' monster.

    Not worth the worry or the $$$ if you ask me. Get it at/under 24 lbs and go ride fast.

  5. #5
    In search of moar cowbell dminor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The 509
    My Bikes
    1971 Suzuki TS125/ factory race kit/AHRMA-legal; 1969 Suzuki TS250/factory race kit; 1967 Suzuki K-15 Hillbilly Trail 80; 1977 Yamaha IT175; 1964 VanTech Scrambler racing frame
    Posts
    12,119
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike494 View Post
    I am looking for things to upgrade to lighten my bike besides frame and rims?
    The engine.

  6. #6
    Senior Member joetronic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Hanover PA
    Posts
    940
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sunset1123 View Post

    V-brakes are lighter than discs. They don't stop quite as well. IME this is not a worthwhile compromise.

    I, and many will beg to differ. A good set of Vs, like XTR, Paul motolite, Avid single digit 7's, are all very very good brakes when set up correctly using quality levers, cables and housing.

    In fact, from personal experiance, the single digit 7's and pauls out stop any mech disk brake I've used, and wieght a crap ton less. A good set (not cheapo) of hydro brakes stop amazingly good, but a good set of proberly set up V's will stop just as well, if not better. Non-disk wheels tend to be lighter too. Not always, but generally are.

    Most people with poor V experience where using either crappy brakes, crappy levers, or had them set up poorly. One of the most common V-brake complains at the shop is due to improper adjustment, or incorrect housing/cable installation. (please, please, PLEASE use ferrules and the correct cables... Seen too many housing with no ferrules, then the customer complains on sloppy braking. This goes for shift cables too.)



    +1 on the engine. Loose 5 lbs, you'll notice a huge difference, even if you don't think you need to. And the best way to do that? Go ride more. And your penis will look bigger too....
    Last edited by joetronic; 05-07-09 at 12:26 PM.

  7. #7
    In search of moar cowbell dminor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The 509
    My Bikes
    1971 Suzuki TS125/ factory race kit/AHRMA-legal; 1969 Suzuki TS250/factory race kit; 1967 Suzuki K-15 Hillbilly Trail 80; 1977 Yamaha IT175; 1964 VanTech Scrambler racing frame
    Posts
    12,119
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by joetronic View Post
    I, and many will beg to differ. A good set of Vs, like XTR, Paul motolite, Avid single digit 7's, etc., etc., etc.
    Oh boy. Get ready for it . . . .


  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Missoula, MT
    My Bikes
    Giant TCX 1 touring conversion
    Posts
    130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Joetronic, I have to say: I have run some damn fine V-brakes, and while just about any brake you mentioned will stop a bike just as well as a good disc, they certainly offer a different feel and IMO less control. My BB7s with Cane Creek DC levers and SJ cables are just somehow better than my old SD7s with kool-stops on the same lever/cable setup.

    In the end, I think the difference between a disc setup and a V-brake setup is slightly less than half a pound. Certainly within the margin of error for preference on something as crucial as brakes.

    ---

    -1 on 'the engine' which seems to be a canned reply to everything weight related on the forums. How do you know how much this rider weighs? On my way out the door I weigh 165 lbs at 6'2. Certainly I don't need to LOSE any weight.

  9. #9
    Senior Member joetronic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Hanover PA
    Posts
    940
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I know, I know, but it needed to be said. I could have said just go SS, or fixed, but thought I'd be kinda a good boy.

    Bring it on!! lol

  10. #10
    use your best eye kenhill3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Olympia, Washington
    My Bikes
    '75 Bertin, '93 Parkpre Team 925, '04 Kona King Kikapu, '05 Bianchi Vigorelli
    Posts
    3,054
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sunset1123 View Post
    Not worth the worry or the $$$ if you ask me. Get it at/under 24 lbs and go ride fast.
    +1 , altho one's particular weight threshold is gonna be affected by what they can afford $$$-wise.

    How much do you suppose going from 30/27lbs down to 24lbs is going to cost?

    I try to get things as light/functional/durable as possible as long as the money and indulgence will allow, then it's just go out and ride the thing and have fun.
    "I tell you, We are here on earth to fart around, and don't let anybody tell you any different." - Kurt Vonnegut jr.

  11. #11
    Rumblefish jtarver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Austin Texas
    My Bikes
    1973 Crescent Pepita Single Speed,1978 Raleigh Competition G.S.,1976 Raleigh Super Course MKII,1970's Motobecane Super Touring Fixed Gear, 1980's Denti Road Tech Five,Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo,1973 Atala Giro,Cheap MTB Tandem,Schwinn World Sport
    Posts
    688
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Drillium
    1973 Crescent Pepita FG, 1987 Panasonic DX-4000, 1991 Trek 1400 FG, 1990's Gary Fisher Hoo-Koo-e-Koo SS, 1990's Denti Road Tech Five, 2009 Surly Long Haul Trucker

  12. #12
    use your best eye kenhill3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Olympia, Washington
    My Bikes
    '75 Bertin, '93 Parkpre Team 925, '04 Kona King Kikapu, '05 Bianchi Vigorelli
    Posts
    3,054
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hey-

    The plain and simple fact is disc performance- that you can ride faster and with more control using disc brakes.

    At least when there is some kind of 'mountain' in your mountain biking.
    "I tell you, We are here on earth to fart around, and don't let anybody tell you any different." - Kurt Vonnegut jr.

  13. #13
    Senior Member joetronic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Hanover PA
    Posts
    940
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sunset1123 View Post
    -1 on 'the engine' which seems to be a canned reply to everything weight related on the forums. How do you know how much this rider weighs? On my way out the door I weigh 165 lbs at 6'2. Certainly I don't need to LOSE any weight.
    No body needs to loose weight, and I don't know how much the OP is, but, if anyone looses 5 or so lbs, you will feel a difference. If not only the less weight, but healthier, and the mental aspect of is it even a better advantage.

    Now, yeah, v-s only loose about 1/2 a lb, but those 1/2 pounds add up. And again, the mental aspect of knowing you lost 1/2 lb in bike weight makes you feel good. Kinda like carbon bars. Not much weight loss over alloy or alum bars, but your brain tells you different.

    okay, my v-brake propaganda rant is over....

    But in all seriously, why worry so much about weight. Hell, my new build is at 24lbs. I could have went lower, but who really cares. As long as you can ride it, thats all that matters. IMO, I would work on your riding technique and endurance. Then when you have the money (since you are asking besides frame and wheelset I take it your on a budget) you can upgrade to a lighter bike. Then at that point you'll be used to jugging around the few extra lbs, and hopping on a lighter bike, you'll f'n fly. just ride as much as you can, and enjoy it.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Missoula, MT
    My Bikes
    Giant TCX 1 touring conversion
    Posts
    130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by joetronic View Post
    No body needs to loose weight, and I don't know how much the OP is, but, if anyone looses 5 or so lbs, you will feel a difference.
    I've seen many riders who look like losing 5 pounds might actually be really unhealthy. I'll inlcude myself in that group at certain points during the season.

    Quote Originally Posted by joetronic View Post
    Hell, my new build is at 24lbs. I could have went lower, but who really cares. As long as you can ride it, thats all that matters. IMO, I would work on your riding technique and endurance.
    Agree completely. If I had built up my bike sub 22lbs, I would worry about breaking things all the time instead of riding hard. And I'm a big believer in technical ability overcoming obstacles... when I see guys cleaning crazy technical climbs up here, it's not the bike, its the rider.

  15. #15
    In search of moar cowbell dminor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The 509
    My Bikes
    1971 Suzuki TS125/ factory race kit/AHRMA-legal; 1969 Suzuki TS250/factory race kit; 1967 Suzuki K-15 Hillbilly Trail 80; 1977 Yamaha IT175; 1964 VanTech Scrambler racing frame
    Posts
    12,119
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sunset1123 View Post
    -1 on 'the engine' which seems to be a canned reply to everything weight related on the forums. How do you know how much this rider weighs? . . .
    There is more truth to this almost always than just flippancy. It covers whether a person could lose a few pounds or not. (BTW, I'm 6'-1" and 175 some I'm not that far off from you myself). Working on the 'engine' is the best, cheapest thing a person can do. Even if you don't need to lose weight, gaining strength or endurance in essence 'lightens' the bike without spending a dime. People fuss with grams here and there in a sea of pounds and foot-pounds.

  16. #16
    Senior Member joetronic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Hanover PA
    Posts
    940
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^^^ding ding ding, we have a winner.

    Really though, your right on brother.

  17. #17
    Senior Member surreal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    2,875
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    As long as we're beating dead horses, i'd like to toss in my "own" cliche: Light, strong, or cheap: pick any 2.

    This is an old chestnut that sort of applies here, although once things get too light, no matter how costly, durability will suffer. Similarly, i have seen things that were cheep and heavy and weak, so that's not always true, either. But, as someone said above in a more roundabout way, going rigid will save weight. Going single might, too, but depending on your frame, it'd be totally not worthwhile to make the conversion.

    -rob

  18. #18
    Is that the MEEWN?! greenpeppers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    T.O.
    My Bikes
    Kahuna 09
    Posts
    43
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ride this.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  19. #19
    use your best eye kenhill3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Olympia, Washington
    My Bikes
    '75 Bertin, '93 Parkpre Team 925, '04 Kona King Kikapu, '05 Bianchi Vigorelli
    Posts
    3,054
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by greenpeppers View Post
    Ride this.
    Duh, I forgot about the hoverbike.
    "I tell you, We are here on earth to fart around, and don't let anybody tell you any different." - Kurt Vonnegut jr.

  20. #20
    Senior Member joetronic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Hanover PA
    Posts
    940
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    you could also shave your legs. Loose at lease a gram or two... lol

    But in all seriousness, you should at least trim your armpits, if not shave em completely. I use a #2 on the clippers. Much cooler and less sweaty on long hot ride.

    Okay, I know I'm gonna get it for that....


    Or ride naked. Even better.....

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Under the Downunder
    My Bikes
    MTBs, BMX, Pocket MTB
    Posts
    1,014
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by kenhill3 View Post
    ... one's particular weight threshold is gonna be affected by what they can afford $$$-wise.

    How much do you suppose going from 30/27lbs down to 24lbs is going to cost?

    I try to get things as light/functional/durable as possible as long as the money and indulgence will allow, then it's just go out and ride the thing and have fun.
    That's sound advice ken. "Law of Diminishing Returns" is applicable here. It might take a few hundred to get a 37lb bike down to 27lbs, but it's likely to take a thousand+ to get a 27lbs bike down to 24lb bike. That last 3 or 4 pounds is gold mine territory and may not be worth the frame it's going to be invested on if the bike started from the 37lb price point.

    Going back to the original OP question, after tires and wheels my next port of call would be hollow-axle cranks and lighter pedals if the bike doesn't already have it... uhmmm after that stem, handlebar then saddle then I'd probably quit lightening after that. Just my 2c

    .

  22. #22
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    2010 Jamis Parker, 2005 Jamis Komodo, 1998 Jamis Komodo, 198? Raleigh Pointe, 1978 Schwinn Super Le Tour 12.2
    Posts
    10,929
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This thread is kinda dumb w/o knowing the OP's current build.

    Recommending blindly is wise.

  23. #23
    In search of moar cowbell dminor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The 509
    My Bikes
    1971 Suzuki TS125/ factory race kit/AHRMA-legal; 1969 Suzuki TS250/factory race kit; 1967 Suzuki K-15 Hillbilly Trail 80; 1977 Yamaha IT175; 1964 VanTech Scrambler racing frame
    Posts
    12,119
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^^ But it's entertaining. E-speculation is the waste-oil that powers the interweb forums .

  24. #24
    Senior Member rb07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    STL, MO
    My Bikes
    05 Specialized Rockhopper, 70s Motobécane Grand Touring
    Posts
    164
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    +1 engine

    The following kind of assumes you are looking at gaining speed for racing or something, but here it is:

    In considering lowering weights on road bikes, I believe they tend to say that loosing 1 pound off the weight is akin to 6 seconds on a 7% climb [1]. And as the article points out, it only gets to be less of an issue over flats. So figure out if making those 6 seconds up as part of losing weight/gaining strength/efficiency is worth the cost of the part to lose 1 lbs. As far as racing, go watch the expert/cat 1 racers and you'll see that the people vying for the podium may have vastly different bike weights/styles, but still are competitive: the engine matters a bit more than the bike. *

    That isn't to say I don't like trying to figure out what things I can buy to lower my own bike's weight or that the rule above really applies directly to mountain biking. I have a list of stuff I'd like to switch or bikes I want to buy b/c of weight. Obviously riding a bike that's <= 24lbs is going to feel worlds different from 30lbs. Now if you're into marathon/endurance riding, it may make sense because you've effectively gone past the point of handling the weight for an hour or two hour mark to somewhere between 3 to 30 hours (where that weight can really add up).

    [1]: http://www.smartcycles.com/bike_weight.htm

    * Watch the WC XCO stuff and the bikes and rider weights are probably all pretty similar
    '07 Specialized Allez Comp | '08 Santa Cruz Superlight RXC | '08 Kona Jake the Snake | '70s Motobécane Grand Touring

  25. #25
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    2010 Jamis Parker, 2005 Jamis Komodo, 1998 Jamis Komodo, 198? Raleigh Pointe, 1978 Schwinn Super Le Tour 12.2
    Posts
    10,929
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    One could own a 6.5lb Domain and sell it for $300, and buy a $400 Float...saving well over 2.5lbs for a mere $100.

    On the other hand...the OP could already be riding a 3.8lb fork, so recommending him to buy a new fork is totally right on...huh???

    (KenHill excluded. He's still my hero.)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •