Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-14-04, 04:12 AM   #1
thetiaan
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Crank arm length

Howzit guys...
I ride a Kona Nunu (1999), and I am upgrading my drivetrain.
Now, the arm length of the crank, does this make such a big difference?
Currently I've got a 175 on it. I'm 6 foot tall, so would a 170 be to short?
Is 5mm worth an extra 3 week wait?
Thanks
Chiao
thetiaan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-04, 05:00 AM   #2
jeff williams
I couldn't car less.
 
jeff williams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Bikes: Ritchey P-series prototype, Diamondback, Nishiki Triathelon Pro.
Posts: 4,395
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Why do feel a need to reduce? I, by measure should do 165+, I run standard ol' school mtb 170. Racing (ya- I'm the pro ) 175. Cadence considered, @ 6 foot I think your going the wrong way, unless you want to spin fast- personally I'd lower my chainring T count first. Unless you have real short legs...

Last edited by jeff williams; 06-14-04 at 05:12 AM.
jeff williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-04, 09:13 AM   #3
a2psyklnut
NCAA - DUAL CHAMPIONS!
 
a2psyklnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: From Sarasota, FL sitting in front of a computer spewing random thoughts!
Bikes: Intense Uzzi SL, Masi Speciale, Trek 3700 Nashbar Single Speed, Old Cilo Road frame
Posts: 7,964
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
A lot of downhillers, 4x and slalom racers run shorter cranks to have more height clearence. I wouldn't recommend going to a shorter crank length unless you are going to get into some form of racing.

For general riding, 175's are recommended. Unless you are REALLY tall or REALLY short. At 6'0" I'd stick with 175's.

L8R
__________________
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "WOW, What a Ride!" - unknown
"Your Bike Sucks" - Sky Yaeger
a2psyklnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-04, 12:09 PM   #4
B1105
Senior Member
 
B1105's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Bikes:
Posts: 592
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yes, 175 or 170 is a good idea. I ahve 165s on my DH bike and the extra clearance is nice, but you can def tell a difference in the amount of power in comparision to my 170s and 175s.
B1105 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-04, 09:06 PM   #5
jcivic00
keep moving forward...
 
jcivic00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NRH
Bikes: 2009 Motobecane Fantom CX
Posts: 403
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
longer crank= less clearance, more leverage and torque. and vise versa
jcivic00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:28 AM.