Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 54
  1. #1
    Senior Member Thunder Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    220
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Have You Ditched Full Squish for Hardtail?

    I am currently riding a 2008 Trek Fuel EX8 and have nothing but good things to say about it. However, as is the case with even the best of the best full sussies out there, more moving parts means it’s prone to more problems. My rig is currently sitting on the workstand, waiting for the repair of some rider-induced trauma. Looking at it sit there, I was half-heartedly musing on the fact on whether or not I would be happier with the simplicity of a 1X9 spd 29er hardtail…maybe even something fully rigid. Sure, I’d have to re-acquire that thing known as “bike handling skills”, but would I avoid the occasional mechanical headache in the process? Any stories from posters here that gave up their beloved full squish in favor of something simpler? If so, please share.
    You gotta whole lotta mountain bike in your axle, bro!

  2. #2
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    2010 Jamis Parker, 2005 Jamis Komodo, 1998 Jamis Komodo, 198? Raleigh Pointe, 1978 Schwinn Super Le Tour 12.2
    Posts
    10,930
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Thunder Dan View Post
    I am currently riding a 2008 Trek Fuel EX8...I was half-heartedly musing on the fact on whether or not I would be happier with the simplicity of a 1X9 spd 29er hardtail…maybe even something fully rigid.
    This information leads me to believe you are confused about your intended riding style. the former is designed for different terrain than the latter.

    Quote Originally Posted by Thunder Dan View Post
    My rig is currently sitting on the workstand, waiting for the repair of some rider-induced trauma.
    What happened exactly?

    Quote Originally Posted by Thunder Dan View Post
    I am currently riding a 2008 Trek Fuel EX8 and have nothing but good things to say about it.
    As is the story I've heard from other EX8 owners. Good bike.

    Quote Originally Posted by Thunder Dan View Post
    I was half-heartedly musing on the fact on whether or not I would be happier with the simplicity...
    That's going to be a personal preference on your part.

    Quote Originally Posted by Thunder Dan View Post
    Sure, I’d have to re-acquire that thing known as “bike handling skills”...
    A common misconception...you'll be fine either way...unless you began as a hack and never improved. It takes just as much skill to ride the EX as it does a Hardtail. You just do it "differently".

    Quote Originally Posted by Thunder Dan View Post
    ...would I avoid the occasional mechanical headache in the process?
    Possibly...but not excessively.

    Quote Originally Posted by Thunder Dan View Post
    Any stories from posters here that gave up their beloved full squish in favor of something simpler? If so, please share.
    I went from rigid geared - front suspended geared - 24spd dually - 24spd front suspended - 29spd front suspended - 1x8 front suspended - 27spd front suspended - 18spd dually - 1x9 front suspended - rigid SS 26'er - 18spd front suspended.


    Going from my 5x5 22/32/bash to a front suspended 1x9 26er was a big change for me. My reasoning was that after weighing the fact that I couldn't keep up with my XC riding buddies on their XC HT's and light/efficient duallies on my 32lb 5x5 against the reality that 90% of my trail riding was spent at a trail network that was pretty groomed and climby...I decided to lose the 6lbs of bike and inefficiency of the rear suspension so that I could climb standing up and fly uphill while still retaining enough energy to enjoy the terrain. Mind you...had I the time to spend honing the motor instead of spending it with my kids...I would probably still be riding the heavy 5x5.

    Now even more recently...I did the rigid SS thing. It's great, I love it. My knees do complain a bit though. I have decided to keep the rigid SS to ride now and then, but my 1x9 26'er is now back to a 2x9 26'er. I'm loving Granny. It's a nice change. I wouldn't mind building up one more bike as a 1x9 so I have all 3 setups. Ya just never know what you'll be in the mood for.


    As far as mechanical headaches...sure, a dually will require pivot bearing replacement and shock rebuild every few years. (make/model pending)

    It is all gonna boil down to your terrain, riding style, energy level, and just plain ol' personal preference.


    Do I regret that I don't have the dually? Yes. Would I trade my hardtail for the dually I once had? Probably not. If I could afford to build a nicer one than my old 5x5...probably would.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Los Gatos, CA
    Posts
    105
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I recently made the switch from hardtail to fs, it's an older one ('01) so the rear suspension doesn't have the same functionality as the new ones do.

    With that being said, I could easily see myself back on a hardtail for two reasons.

    1. The terrain I ride is conducive - very long fireroads up and nothing too technically challenging down.

    2. And what seems to be a rather good selling point, it seems you get so much more for your money when you opt for a hardtail. For 2k I can get into a really nice 29'er Stumpjumper (h/t) for example, that won't even get you invited to the party for the f/s version.

    I think it's a tough sell to yourself if you think a hardtail is going to require less maintenance then a full suspension. I suppose with a rear shock that is another opportunity for failure (which you must have found), but that doesn't seem like something that would happen too often.

  4. #4
    "I'm OK!" dminor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The 509
    My Bikes
    1971 Suzuki TS125/factory race kit/AHRMA-legal; 1969 Suzuki TS250/factory race kit; 1967 Suzuki K-15 Hillbilly Trail 80; 1977 Yamaha IT175; 1964 VanTech Scrambler racing frame
    Posts
    12,054
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm doing just the opposite. I'm trying to ditch my hardtails. Thanks to a hand-me-down frame from my son, I was finally able to build a full-suspension trail bike this year . . . and have been loving it to pieces, even if it is a bit on the chunky side. The only thing I really want to be aboard a hardtail for is the occasional cross country race (and that is only because I can't justify buying a FS XC race bike).

  5. #5
    Too Much Crazy
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    NY
    My Bikes
    Ventana El Comandante, Lynskey ridgeline, EWR OWB, GF HKEK, Gunnar Roadie, Spesh E5 S Works, Quintana Roo Kilo, Intense BMX Cruiser
    Posts
    3,299
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by chelboed View Post
    This information leads me to believe you are confused about your intended riding style. the former is designed for different terrain than the latter.
    .
    What terrain is fuel ex8 designed for? You can't ride a hardtail on that?

  6. #6
    Dion Rides
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by starvingdavid View Post
    I recently made the switch from hardtail to fs, it's an older one ('01) so the rear suspension doesn't have the same functionality as the new ones do.

    With that being said, I could easily see myself back on a hardtail for two reasons.

    1. The terrain I ride is conducive - very long fireroads up and nothing too technically challenging down.

    2. And what seems to be a rather good selling point, it seems you get so much more for your money when you opt for a hardtail. For 2k I can get into a really nice 29'er Stumpjumper (h/t) for example, that won't even get you invited to the party for the f/s version.

    I think it's a tough sell to yourself if you think a hardtail is going to require less maintenance then a full suspension. I suppose with a rear shock that is another opportunity for failure (which you must have found), but that doesn't seem like something that would happen too often.
    Do you ride Wilder and UC? Because seeing that you live in Los Gatos and describing the terrain, I TOTALLY UNDERSTAND! For where we live and ride, I really can't see the advantage of a full suspension over a hardtail... in fact, with the fireroad climbs the hardtail just makes sense. I'm in spitting distance of Santa Teresa County park and my full rigid SS works just fine for it.

    I guess you really have to take your riding environment into consideration.

    My next bike will be a geared hardtail for sure.

  7. #7
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    2010 Jamis Parker, 2005 Jamis Komodo, 1998 Jamis Komodo, 198? Raleigh Pointe, 1978 Schwinn Super Le Tour 12.2
    Posts
    10,930
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by C Law View Post
    What terrain is fuel ex8 designed for? You can't ride a hardtail on that?

    Sure, you can ride a BMX bike on the same terrain...but a Fuel EX was designed to ride a different sort of trail than some possible rigid 29'er that the OP is considering. I ride rocky crap on my rigid 26'er...but if I lived near trails like that and rode them all the time...you'd better believe I'd be back on a dually.
    Last edited by ed; 08-07-09 at 01:22 PM.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Flagstaff, AZ
    My Bikes
    Marin Pt. Reyes, Gary Fisher HiFi Pro, Easy Racers Gold Rush recumbent, Cannondale F600
    Posts
    976
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Have You Ditched Full Squish for Hardtail?
    Am debating that question right now, but it's more due to coming to a fork in the road of MTB life. My old Jeckyl is worn out and I know from test rides I'm going to have to ante up $2K to get something I'll be happy with to stay in the DS game. Rode hardtails for years and did OK, but downhill was always tough- I'm super light and got pounded mercilessly. OK maybe it's not that hard a decision.

  9. #9
    bikegeekmn bikegeekmn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    duluth
    My Bikes
    Miyata710, 04' Fisher Cake, '63 Raleigh 3-speed sport, Giant FCR1, 89''Mita Quick Cross, Lotus Grand Prix Luxe, Nashbar Al. DT shifter road bike,
    Posts
    284
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I enjoy going back to riding a full rigid bike from my dualy, every once in a while.What I really do'nt like is the next day,I'm getting older and trail riding takes a bigger toll now than it did.You add a couple more wear items but,just about every part on a bike is a wear part.I will gladly take a few more things to go wrong in a trade for all the good things(and there are a lot)that come with fs.

  10. #10
    Senior Member thehammerdog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    NJ
    My Bikes
    Road bike is a Bianchi C2C, Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & 1980's Grandis
    Posts
    1,823
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I gave up my cutting edge 4 bar linkage speciakized FRS Expert for a HT Gary fisher mid range HT....I luv it...I never felt comfy on the thing....no wI can clear stuff I could not...I was so uncomfortable it was slow.....I am now gonna get a suspension post to take the edge off..I am so much faster now.....Oh yeah and I a 40 somethin gold fat dude....been riding Mt bikes since 1986.....I had the c-dale beast of the east back in the day.....

  11. #11
    Official Website Waterboy born2bahick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    a lot
    Posts
    3,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Is this really a life choice for some? I thought everyone had three or four bikes.

  12. #12
    Bike Junkie roccobike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    South of Raleigh, North of New Hill, West of Harris Lake, NC
    My Bikes
    Giant OCR-C, Specialized Tarmac, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, Stumpjumper Comp, 05 Rockhopper, 88 & 92Nishiki Ariel, 01 Bianchi Campione, 87 Centurion Ironman, 92 Paramount, 97 Lemond
    Posts
    8,824
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by born2bahick View Post
    is this really a life choice for some? I thought everyone had three or four bikes.
    +1, or 5 or 6.....
    Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator

  13. #13
    Svr
    Svr is offline
    Senior Member Svr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    1,223
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by born2bahick View Post
    Is this really a life choice for some? I thought everyone had three or four bikes.
    Yep, you really have to have one of each type of MTB.

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    37
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm a recent convert back to full rigid - I like the simplicity, stiffness, responsiveness and light weight, plus i still have some (full) adjustable suspension (adjustable pressure in 2" tires !)

  15. #15
    Senior Member neospazzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    524
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Gave up on my 2007 Trek Fuel EX7 to a 2009 Moto Ti Fly. I do miss the full suspension when going over rough terrain while seated, but all that goes away when I am flying up the hills of Mount Wilson on my new hardtail. All I do now is just to get off the saddle during the bumpy descents.
    Neo

    Bike #1 2012 Cannondale SuperSix EVO Di2
    Bike #2 2012 Colnago Master X Light w/ Campy SR11

  16. #16
    "I'm OK!" dminor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The 509
    My Bikes
    1971 Suzuki TS125/factory race kit/AHRMA-legal; 1969 Suzuki TS250/factory race kit; 1967 Suzuki K-15 Hillbilly Trail 80; 1977 Yamaha IT175; 1964 VanTech Scrambler racing frame
    Posts
    12,054
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'll just say this: one ride on a real trail would make anybody a believer in all the suspension they could stuff under themselves.

    -- Reporting from Whistler.

  17. #17
    Official Website Waterboy born2bahick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    a lot
    Posts
    3,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dminor View Post
    I'll just say this: one ride on a real trail would make anybody a believer in all the suspension they could stuff under themselves.

    -- Reporting from Whistler.
    So your saying it's the quality between your legs and not the quantity?

  18. #18
    Senior Member Duce97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Chicago
    My Bikes
    Mongoose Snare
    Posts
    137
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have 4 bikes ..

    2 hartails for XC stuff and 2 FS for downhill stuff. I wouldnt trade my hardtail for a FS on a XC track nor woud i trade my FS for my hardtail on a downill tack .

    Each bike has its place in my opinion , depending on your riding style , where you ride and what you can afford.

  19. #19
    "I'm OK!" dminor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The 509
    My Bikes
    1971 Suzuki TS125/factory race kit/AHRMA-legal; 1969 Suzuki TS250/factory race kit; 1967 Suzuki K-15 Hillbilly Trail 80; 1977 Yamaha IT175; 1964 VanTech Scrambler racing frame
    Posts
    12,054
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by born2bahick View Post
    So your saying it's the quality between your legs and not the quantity?
    Quality is fine but quantity is everything. Just saying that I raced down a trail yesterday so perversely steep, deep and gnarly that I don't even think I would ride three years ago. End of discussion.

  20. #20
    Dion Rides
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by dminor View Post
    Quality is fine but quantity is everything. Just saying that I raced down a trail yesterday so perversely steep, deep and gnarly that I don't even think I would ride three years ago. End of discussion.
    On the Santa Cruz single-tracks I rode yesterday on my full rigid, I remember descending the same ones on my Big Hit a few years ago. And yes... the rigid almost bucked me off a half-dozen times. Made me want my Big Hit again just for that section.

    But then again, my veteran CX racer brother was dropping other riders like flies on his 20 yr. old Rock Lobster steel CX bike.

    Damn I suck.

  21. #21
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    2010 Jamis Parker, 2005 Jamis Komodo, 1998 Jamis Komodo, 198? Raleigh Pointe, 1978 Schwinn Super Le Tour 12.2
    Posts
    10,930
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Obviously all in where you ride.


    If I had my 'druthers...I'd be shuttle riding a Blindside down Galbraith every day.

  22. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    239
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I like the elegance of a rigid bike, and own two of them. The one I ride most, though, is the full-suspension outfit. Why? It's comfortable. The rigid bikes are quicker, smaller, more manageable and prettier, but I'm not a racer. So for my long rides I take the Turner and come home smiling. Maybe it's a little slower but I'm not all that fast anyway.

  23. #23
    just keep riding BluesDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Milledgeville, Georgia
    My Bikes
    2014 Specialized Crave Pro 29, 2014 Specialized Crux EVO Carbon Disc, 2012 Black Mountain Cycles Monster Cross, 2011 Specialized Roubaix SL3 Expert Compact, 2009 Salsa Casseroll, 2003 KHS Milano Tandem, 1986 Nishiki Cadence rigid MTB
    Posts
    12,648
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There's no law saying you can't have both. The N+1 law says you should have one more (and then one more, and then one more, and then...)
    The more you ride your bike, the less your ass will hurt.

  24. #24
    astrositupataphysicyclist UBUvelo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Media PA
    My Bikes
    too many now
    Posts
    596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    yeah, it's a matter of affordability, too.

    i will probably go for the FS next year...i am just warming back up to hitting the trails and it's been years...

    in 1993 my first 'real' ride was a Giant Iguana with an added FlexStem...

    and i just took front suspension off my current (but old) Trek which is now totally rigid.

    i admit, 80% of the time, i am glad to have it as it is. new knobbies deflated just right will up that to maybe 85%....(something like that).

    but today, big, loose rocks and large washout pounded my wrists. they still hurt.

    again, that was a new trail, so next time i'll know how to hit it. still, HD and FS have their place and change the rules. not for better or worse. just different.
    .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 after the big bang

    2008 GT Peace 9er singlespeed--small (goatcross)
    2010 GT Peace 9er singlespeed--medium
    2004 Bianchi Axis 1x9 (cyclocross)
    1993 Giant Avonni (mutantcross)
    2009 Giant Defy 2 (cobblecross)
    1990 Schwinn Caliente (medicinecross)
    2009 Giant Yukon FX (root/rock/mudcrosscountry)--recent addition: RockShox Revelation U-Turn

  25. #25
    Senior Member mystolenbikes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    Specialized Hardrock
    Posts
    622
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I know everyone here is gonna say never say never but I don't think I'll be owning a HT or a full rigid bike as long as I can afford to have a full suspension bike. I a few days ago I swapped bikes with my buddy who owns a rockhopper pro because he is looking to get a stumpjumper and man I am telling you that bike sucked! Go a head flame me all you want I am telling like it is, I was bouncing over every rock and pebble I think I lost a few fillings from my teeth. IMO arguing about benfits of an FS is like saying first computers we build 30-40 years ago were better than the ones we have today or ford model T rode better because it had stiffer suspension, cmon people how is it that possible?
    What's next? Replacing the shocks in our cars with steel rods?
    Go a head let the firing begin.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •