Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Choosing an entry model

    I have a choice between a Trek 3700 (LBS) at $460 and Infinity Arrow built by ABM (Costco) at $401.

    Bikes are equipped with almost the exact same Shimano Acera hardware and warranty. The only difference are:

    The ABM reputation, never heard of them ???
    The ABM comes with front & rear disk breaks
    The Trek is about $59 more but comes with conventional brakes...

    Will be using for city training and occasional real mountain bike trails. No jumping of any sorts.

    ref: Link to Trek 3700
    Last edited by peter_m; 08-12-09 at 06:48 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    112
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Between those two, go for the Trek.

    I recently helped a friend shop for an entry level bike and was able to find him a leftover 2008 Raleigh Mojave 8.0 at a LBS for $469. If you can find something like that, you will do MUCH better. My advice is keep shopping.

  3. #3
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Looked around for a better deal and I settled on the Trek 3700 witch he left at $400 taxes in...

    Thanks for the advice.

    Peter

  4. #4
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The LBS suggested an 16" frame and I am 5' 7.5" In the store everything was fine but once on the pavement it feels short. When I put my seat in the highest position for city commuting I swear I could use another 1" in seat height. According to the LBS and the Internet's infinite wisdom, the size is right, I have enough clearance when standing over the frame with both feet on the ground. While pedalling I supposedly have the right bend in my knees...

    But the seat feels so awkward and low compared to my road bike. Should I get the 18" instead?

    Peter
    Last edited by peter_m; 08-14-09 at 09:41 AM.

  5. #5
    foolishly delirious RatedZeroHero's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Panhandle of NE
    Posts
    798
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by peter_m View Post
    The LBS suggested an 16" frame and I am 5' 7.5" In the store everything was fine but once on the pavement it feels short. When I put my seat in the highest position for city commuting I swear I could use another 1" in seat height. According to the LBS and the Internet's infinite wisdom, the size is right, I have enough clearance when standing over the frame with both feet on the ground. While pedalling I supposedly have the right bend in my knees...

    But the seat feels so awkward and low compared to my road bike. Should I get the 18" instead?

    Peter
    it is possibly you are more leg than torso...

    i'm about half leg half torso... try the next size up... i rode too small of a bike for along time and it just sucked.
    Last edited by RatedZeroHero; 08-14-09 at 11:04 AM.

  6. #6
    Addicted to Dirt Freefallman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Socal
    My Bikes
    Stumpjumper Comp 09, Nishiki Prestige (1990)
    Posts
    224
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by peter_m View Post
    The LBS suggested an 16" frame and I am 5' 7.5" In the store everything was fine but once on the pavement it feels short. When I put my seat in the highest position for city commuting I swear I could use another 1" in seat height. According to the LBS and the Internet's infinite wisdom, the size is right, I have enough clearance when standing over the frame with both feet on the ground. While pedalling I supposedly have the right bend in my knees...

    But the seat feels so awkward and low compared to my road bike. Should I get the 18" instead?

    Peter


    I have ridden a 17.5 / medium for years and I'm 5 '10. Mountain bike sizing typically runs a little smaller than road bikes as it increases maneuverability. You could try adjusting the saddle's setback or possibly invest in a longer stem to spread out your cockpit. Right now Easton is clearing out it's two bolt stem design so you can get a really nice stem for 20 bucks and better than anything that would have come stock on your bike for 10. Just some thoughts....

    Edit:

    It should be noted that I've got a long torso compared to my legs. I don't see it but people helping size me for bikes, backpacks, etc. do which means I've ended up on smaller bikes....

  7. #7
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thank you for the sanity check guys.

    Not sure if I have more legs then torso but I definitely don't have short legs. Tried to slide the seat as far as possible and it helped, but did nothing for height from the pedals to the seat. Went to the shop and tried an 18" and decided to go with the 18". The owner did not even blink and said it was fine to exchange. Happy! Clearance standing over the frame with feet on the ground is tighter but still have 1.5" . I know it will be less manoeuvrable on the trail but I can at least adjust the seat down.

    Thank you much,

    Peter
    Last edited by peter_m; 08-14-09 at 11:09 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •