Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 24 of 24

Thread: Full Rigid

  1. #1
    Senior Member Gambutrol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    My Bikes
    3Rensho SRA
    Posts
    443
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Full Rigid

    Just got into mountain biking last spring and I'm thinking about going full rigid. I've been riding a hardtail I got on craigslist for about $40 and the fork has about 30mm travel left in it and weighs a ton. I ride sometimes rocky single-track.

    Anyone on here ride full rigid? How is it? One of my concerns is that my traction wouldn't be as good without the suspension pushing the front wheel into the ground.
    3Rensho + 09 Campagnolo Centaur

  2. #2
    Senior Member nachomc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    My Bikes
    Epic and Tarmac
    Posts
    1,259
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Frankly, riding rigid probably won't be much different than riding with that suspended fork.
    cleanspokes

    29 inches to freedom.

  3. #3
    Gravity hunter dminor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The 509
    My Bikes
    1971 Suzuki TS125/ factory race kit/AHRMA-legal; 1969 Suzuki TS250/factory race kit; 1967 Suzuki K-15 Hillbilly Trail 80; 1977 Yamaha IT175; 1964 VanTech Scrambler racing frame
    Posts
    12,183
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So let me see if I have this right: You bought a bargain bike off CL that has a crappy fork and you're ready to write off suspension because of this experience? Sounds like it's time to move forward rather than backward.
    Last edited by dminor; 08-20-09 at 11:28 AM.

  4. #4
    afraid of whales Mr IGH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Front Range, CO
    Posts
    2,633
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There are forks for less than $50, worth trying. Many people run rigid.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    IGH's, Dyno Hubs, LED lights and old frames

  5. #5
    Senior Member helmut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    435
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  6. #6
    Dion Rides
    Guest
    I ride a full rigid 29'er singlespeed. It's fun, but decided to buy a Ti XC hardtail with front suspension. Rigid is fun, but generally slower than something with suspension. I like it a lot, though, and I don't expect to hang with FS bikes on the rocks.

    But again, I ride a 29'er. The thought of riding a 26" rigid again hurts my teeth.

  7. #7
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    Hecklah
    Posts
    10,932
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My first recommendation would be to ride the bike as is until you can afford a good dual suspension trail bike to ride on the "rocky" trails.

    My second would be to do the same and save for a good quality front suspended trail bike if you can't afford a good dually.

    My 3rd and final would be to do the same and save for a Redline D440 29'er 1x9 rigid bike.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Commodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Burnaby, BC
    Posts
    4,144
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I ride a rigid carbon mtb. I like the direct power transfer and don't mind looking for the smooth line. Nice thing about a real light fork is how easy it is to get up and over stuff in technical sections. You definitely ride slower, but to me it's more fun.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Gambutrol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    My Bikes
    3Rensho SRA
    Posts
    443
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by dminor View Post
    So let me see if I have this right: You bought a bargain bike off CL that has a crappy fork and you're ready to write off suspension because of this experience? Sounds like it's time to move forward rather than backward.
    I'm not writing off suspension, I'm just thinking about swapping out the crappy suspension fork for a much lighter rigid fork. Just wanted to know about some personal experiences before taking the dip.
    3Rensho + 09 Campagnolo Centaur

  10. #10
    Senior Member Gambutrol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Dayton, OH
    My Bikes
    3Rensho SRA
    Posts
    443
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by chelboed View Post
    My first recommendation would be to ride the bike as is until you can afford a good dual suspension trail bike to ride on the "rocky" trails.

    My second would be to do the same and save for a good quality front suspended trail bike if you can't afford a good dually.

    My 3rd and final would be to do the same and save for a Redline D440 29'er 1x9 rigid bike.
    Thanks for the advice! I'm wanting to upgrade to a 1x9 29er as soon as I can afford it (probably not for another few years) and I didn't know that Redline offered a full rigid model. Maybe I'll try full rigid on this for a while and see how much I can handle.
    3Rensho + 09 Campagnolo Centaur

  11. #11
    Strob sjs731's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    My Bikes
    Trek 4300 and Redline D460 29er
    Posts
    77
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I ride a Redline D460 29er 1x9 with a Bontrager carbon fork. I really see no drawbacks with it as compared to my hardtails. I think the carbon fork and 29er wheels help with the rough stuff a bit. I also like the weight savings over a suspension fork. I did a 12 hour solo race and felt just fine when I finished.

  12. #12
    Bike Junkie roccobike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    South of Raleigh, North of New Hill, East of Harris Lake, NC
    My Bikes
    Giant OCR-C, Specialized Tarmac, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, Stumpjumper Comp, 05 Rockhopper, 88 & 92Nishiki Ariel, 01 Bianchi Campione, 87 Centurion Ironman, 92 Paramount, 97 Lemond
    Posts
    8,981
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I rode a rigid for the first three months I did mountain biking. I added a front suspension, and never looked back.
    Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator

  13. #13
    Quirky Grifter LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, USA
    My Bikes
    My War
    Posts
    20,942
    Mentioned
    62 Post(s)
    Tagged
    9 Thread(s)
    If a bike's sproingy fork retails for less than $300, I'd usually rather ride rigid, personally. I built up my KHS a little while ago, found an old, cheep, crappy suspension fork to slap in there. Rode it for a couple months before getting a rigid one on there.

    Now the bike actually goes where I point it! I love it as is, but I'm apt to make rides much shorter, cuz the rigid really beats up these 40+ year old multiple skateboard/snowboard accident surviving wrists.

    Besides the accurate steering, there's also easier jumping and better climbing.

    I'm saving up for another REAL suspension fork at the moment...
    1980ish Free Spirit Sunbird fixed * 1996 Mongoose IBOC Zero-G * 1997 KHS Comp * 1990-ish Scapin * Lemond Buenos Aires Triple

  14. #14
    Endurance junkie
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Ann Arbor, Michigan
    My Bikes
    '93 GT Pantera, '03 Fuji Marseille, '05 Klein Attitude, Dahon Impulse, Bike Friday Family Triple
    Posts
    157
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I rode for 3 years on a full rigid bike (back before suspension forks were common as OEM)

    It's pretty punishing on your hands so wear gloves but You learn how to ride better fast. The handling skills you develop will let you take trails faster once you do put a decent suspension fork on it than your buddies who learned to ride with a suspension fork from day 1

    Just my experience / opinion
    '93 GT Pantera (childseat and trailer duty)
    '99 Dahon Impulse (retrofitted w/ 7SP Megarange)
    '03 Fuji Marseille
    '05 Klein Attitude
    Bike Friday Family Triple (The Truckster!)
    Burley D'Lite Trailer (Hitches on ALL bikes!)

  15. #15
    astrositupataphysicyclist UBUvelo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Media PA
    My Bikes
    too many now
    Posts
    596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by twentysixtwo View Post
    I rode for 3 years on a full rigid bike (back before suspension forks were common as OEM)

    It's pretty punishing on your hands so wear gloves but You learn how to ride better fast. The handling skills you develop will let you take trails faster once you do put a decent suspension fork on it than your buddies who learned to ride with a suspension fork from day 1

    Just my experience / opinion
    i agree. i know there are naysayers...

    but i admit, if i KNOW there are huge stones and rocks and it's downhill FAST, suspension will help and save the wrists. today i explored a new trail that was really fast, punishing and...i knew i would be in less pain had i gone slower, but i wanted to push it. now my wrists are killing me.

    still, i prefer the rigid for most applications. until they make front suspension that is extremely light, i will stay with the rigid set up with tires deflated accordingly.
    .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 after the big bang

    2008 GT Peace 9er singlespeed--small (goatcross)
    2010 GT Peace 9er singlespeed--medium
    2004 Bianchi Axis 1x9 (cyclocross)
    1993 Giant Avonni (mutantcross)
    2009 Giant Defy 2 (cobblecross)
    1990 Schwinn Caliente (medicinecross)
    2009 Giant Yukon FX (root/rock/mudcrosscountry)--recent addition: RockShox Revelation U-Turn

  16. #16
    Senior Member jjbod1's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Dacula,Ga
    Posts
    402
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I personally cant speak for myself, for I haven't rode a rigid bike since my BMX years. But I can honestly say that I know more than several fellow riders who have bought 29r fully rigid hardtails, and not even a month after owning them they end up getting front suspension forks. And again that's 29r's, you put a rigid on a 26r and you are really asking for a beating. But hey its your body.

  17. #17
    astrositupataphysicyclist UBUvelo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Media PA
    My Bikes
    too many now
    Posts
    596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    would the weight be about the same? rigid 29er vs. a hardtail 26?

    i weighed my rigid today and it is about 30 pounds. which 'sounds' heavy. i took off the lead/concrete old shocks...it's aluminum with the new cro-moly fork. weird.
    .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 after the big bang

    2008 GT Peace 9er singlespeed--small (goatcross)
    2010 GT Peace 9er singlespeed--medium
    2004 Bianchi Axis 1x9 (cyclocross)
    1993 Giant Avonni (mutantcross)
    2009 Giant Defy 2 (cobblecross)
    1990 Schwinn Caliente (medicinecross)
    2009 Giant Yukon FX (root/rock/mudcrosscountry)--recent addition: RockShox Revelation U-Turn

  18. #18
    omygodomygod TwinCam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    yay area ca
    Posts
    420
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A rigid fork should be better in every concievable way than the junk you have on now.

    These days, you can actually get a susp fork for 200 bucks that will work better than a rigid fork. Not true just five years ago. But 200 is obviosuly still too spendy for a 40 dollar bike. Throw the rigid on there and make it a trusty old bike. Then save up for something better all around.

  19. #19
    Road, XC and Cross
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    My Bikes
    Motobecane Outcast 29er, Motobecane Fantom Comp, Motobecane Fantom CX and Fuji 2.0 acr
    Posts
    312
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    screw chelbod. he is a woss. go full rigid. i do it on my single speed 29er and its a blast! you dont need ds. ds is bs in my opinion. id go 29er if your going full rigid though. in 29ers you can run low pressures and the you get a surprising amount of give without pinch flats.

  20. #20
    Gravity hunter dminor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The 509
    My Bikes
    1971 Suzuki TS125/ factory race kit/AHRMA-legal; 1969 Suzuki TS250/factory race kit; 1967 Suzuki K-15 Hillbilly Trail 80; 1977 Yamaha IT175; 1964 VanTech Scrambler racing frame
    Posts
    12,183
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ^^ It's silly crap like this that keeps the wheels on this bus of bozos going 'round and 'round. Gotta love it.

  21. #21
    ÖöÖöÖöÖöÖö Dannihilator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Annandale, NJ.
    My Bikes
    2014 Surly Steamroller, 1977 Puch Pathfinder
    Posts
    18,924
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mtb_man_14 View Post
    screw chelbod. he is a woss. go full rigid. i do it on my single speed 29er and its a blast! you dont need ds. ds is bs in my opinion. id go 29er if your going full rigid though. in 29ers you can run low pressures and the you get a surprising amount of give without pinch flats.
    Wow, someone is trend bound.
    Strike like an eagle and sacrifice the dove.
    Words and Stuff.

  22. #22
    ........ Face-Plant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    WNC, USA.
    My Bikes
    Surly - LHT, Stumpjumper FSR Comp
    Posts
    98
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Back when it was only rigid it was fun, then came FS it became even funner, now we have dual suspension, and I will never look back again. Well maybe I'll build up a hard tail/FS one day, but it's so much fun to pre-load a dual suspension bike and get a few sec of extra air time when screeming down hill balls out.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  23. #23
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    Hecklah
    Posts
    10,932
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mtb_man_14 View Post
    screw chelbod. he is a woss. go full rigid. i do it on my single speed 29er and its a blast! you dont need ds. ds is bs in my opinion. id go 29er if your going full rigid though. in 29ers you can run low pressures and the you get a surprising amount of give without pinch flats.
    Give 3 viable options and get hate in return.

  24. #24
    astrositupataphysicyclist UBUvelo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Media PA
    My Bikes
    too many now
    Posts
    596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    again, as reiterated else where, what is the limit?

    true it's about getting a bike that works for you AND you should know what you are planning to do, even if the plan goes awry. there's where the skill comes in...no matter what you are riding.

    there are times when a total rigid sucks...but more often, not the case.

    true, a FS will give you confidence to try more and push harder...but it's a bike for certain applications.

    they'll always be heavier. insane descents are probably one of it's best terrains.

    but trail riding is alot more than riding downhill on a marshmallow bike.
    .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 after the big bang

    2008 GT Peace 9er singlespeed--small (goatcross)
    2010 GT Peace 9er singlespeed--medium
    2004 Bianchi Axis 1x9 (cyclocross)
    1993 Giant Avonni (mutantcross)
    2009 Giant Defy 2 (cobblecross)
    1990 Schwinn Caliente (medicinecross)
    2009 Giant Yukon FX (root/rock/mudcrosscountry)--recent addition: RockShox Revelation U-Turn

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •