Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 47
  1. #1
    Senior Member mzeffex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO
    My Bikes
    2011 S-works Tarmac SL3 Red, 2009 Fuji SLM 2.0 XT, 1986 Lotus Grand Prix Luxe single speed, 2012 Blue Norcross, Torelli Tipo Uno
    Posts
    8,029
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Is mountain bike weight that important?

    For a non-racer, that is. My hardtail hardrock comes in at a hair under 31 pounds. '99 frame, upgraded with Manitou splice and XT drivetrain. Juicy 7. Not a bad weight for it, I think.

    Anyways, is that an okay weight for my bike? Is mountain bike weight that important compared to road bikes? Thanks. I think this is more opinionated than anything, but oh well.
    Quote Originally Posted by rjones28 View Post
    Are they talking about spectators feeding the cyclists? You know, like don't feed the bears?

  2. #2
    worship satan. johnnytheboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    USA! USA! USA!!
    My Bikes
    all of them.
    Posts
    2,328
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i rode a 33lb bike for a while.
    i now have a bike that weighs less than 23lbs.

    2 things:

    riding a heavy bike made me appreciate and take advantage of the 23lb bike- i feel like i'm a much better rider on the 23lb bike.

    light bikes climb like goats
    http://www.pedalroom.com/members/johnnytheboy
    ^pedalroom.

  3. #3
    ٩๏̯͡๏)۶ Luke52's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    My Bikes
    2010 Giant Filter 1. 07/08 Apollo Independent.
    Posts
    502
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Not 100% sure on how much my current bike weighs, but it's not light..

    My next bike (2010 Giant Filer 1) supposedly weighs a considerable amount less. I will report back when I get it

  4. #4
    Senior Member mzeffex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO
    My Bikes
    2011 S-works Tarmac SL3 Red, 2009 Fuji SLM 2.0 XT, 1986 Lotus Grand Prix Luxe single speed, 2012 Blue Norcross, Torelli Tipo Uno
    Posts
    8,029
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm used to an 18 pound road bike, but can haul ass on a 31 pound mountain too. Is 31 heavy for a hardtail? Steel.
    Quote Originally Posted by rjones28 View Post
    Are they talking about spectators feeding the cyclists? You know, like don't feed the bears?

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    705
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    31 is a bit on the heavy side, even for a steel frame.

  6. #6
    Senior Member mzeffex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO
    My Bikes
    2011 S-works Tarmac SL3 Red, 2009 Fuji SLM 2.0 XT, 1986 Lotus Grand Prix Luxe single speed, 2012 Blue Norcross, Torelli Tipo Uno
    Posts
    8,029
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I thought the DT swiss wheels and full XT might drop the weight. I think the fork added to it though. That's a bit heavy.
    Quote Originally Posted by rjones28 View Post
    Are they talking about spectators feeding the cyclists? You know, like don't feed the bears?

  7. #7
    astrositupataphysicyclist UBUvelo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Media PA
    My Bikes
    too many now
    Posts
    596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    what are the best/lightest front shocks out there?

    i think weight is a HUGE difference, especially up insane ascents. i think downhill would be less of an issue, but weight can still throw off some responsiveness.
    .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 after the big bang

    2008 GT Peace 9er singlespeed--small (goatcross)
    2010 GT Peace 9er singlespeed--medium
    2004 Bianchi Axis 1x9 (cyclocross)
    1993 Giant Avonni (mutantcross)
    2009 Giant Defy 2 (cobblecross)
    1990 Schwinn Caliente (medicinecross)
    2009 Giant Yukon FX (root/rock/mudcrosscountry)--recent addition: RockShox Revelation U-Turn

  8. #8
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    Hecklah
    Posts
    10,932
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mzeffex View Post
    Is mountain bike weight that important?
    Depends on who you try to hang with and how fast you personally want to go.

  9. #9
    another retro grouch Mr IGH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Front Range, CO
    Posts
    2,574
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If a rider's body fat level is over 10%, the money spent on a lighter weight bike is a waste of money. Might make a rider "feel" better, it won't make him faster.
    IGH's, Dyno Hubs, LED lights and old frames

  10. #10
    Senior Member mzeffex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO
    My Bikes
    2011 S-works Tarmac SL3 Red, 2009 Fuji SLM 2.0 XT, 1986 Lotus Grand Prix Luxe single speed, 2012 Blue Norcross, Torelli Tipo Uno
    Posts
    8,029
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by chelboed View Post
    Depends on who you try to hang with and how fast you personally want to go.
    I suppose. I'm not slow on my bike, though. Maybe that's because the guy I usually bike with is riding a 45 pound giant dh bike
    Quote Originally Posted by rjones28 View Post
    Are they talking about spectators feeding the cyclists? You know, like don't feed the bears?

  11. #11
    Surf Bum
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pacifica, CA
    My Bikes
    Vintage Trek, Vintage Diamond Back Mountain Bike, Bianchi Axis CrossBike
    Posts
    2,011
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr IGH View Post
    If a rider's body fat level is over 10%, the money spent on a lighter weight bike is a waste of money. Might make a rider "feel" better, it won't make him faster.
    Just because people keep saying stuff like this, it doesn't mean it's true. Especially for mountain biking where one is moving the bike around under him independently of his body weight.

    If you don't believe me, compare carrying 5 lbs. in a backpack vs. carrying 5 lbs. hanging off the end of a 1-meter long stick. The backpack weight is analogous to body weight, while the weight on the end of the lever is analogous to a heavy front wheel/fork/whatever that is a distance away from one's body. How would you rather carry that 5 lbs.?

  12. #12
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    Hecklah
    Posts
    10,932
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mzeffex View Post
    I suppose. I'm not slow on my bike, though. Maybe that's because the guy I usually bike with is riding a 45 pound giant dh bike
    I go in waves/phases...some days I'm really fast, other days I'm struggling to keep up. If I looked at my avg speed...I'll bet it'd be pretty much the same either way. The only difference is the days I'm struggling seems to be the days I'm riding with B2B's crew

  13. #13
    Official Website Waterboy born2bahick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    a lot
    Posts
    3,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Puleeez, I remember you handing it to me on that SS earlier this year.

  14. #14
    another retro grouch Mr IGH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Front Range, CO
    Posts
    2,574
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by pacificaslim View Post
    Just because people keep saying stuff like this, it doesn't mean it's true....
    spoken like a true consumerist. I see it all the time. Crappy climbers overweight on 22lbs bikes, too bad they don't bother to RIDE. If you want to be a better climber, go ride hilly trails. If you want to have the shinest MTB, make sure it's light too
    IGH's, Dyno Hubs, LED lights and old frames

  15. #15
    Senior Member nachomc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    My Bikes
    Epic and Tarmac
    Posts
    1,259
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Weight is definitely important. You'll certainly notice the difference, regardless of your body weight, between climbing a 40lb bike and a 30lb or lighter bike. You'll notice it over technical stuff and down hill as well, and not to mention when you put it on your car at the end of the day . As you get down to the low 20 lb range, you have to decide if the cost is worth the weight savings and potential for reliability issues (light stuff can be super durable, but can also be nice and breakable).
    cleanspokes

    29 inches to freedom.

  16. #16
    Official Website Waterboy born2bahick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    a lot
    Posts
    3,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr IGH View Post
    spoken like a true consumerist. I see it all the time. Crappy climbers overweight on 22lbs bikes, too bad they don't bother to RIDE. If you want to be a better climber, go ride hilly trails. If you want to have the shinest MTB, make sure it's light too
    Cmon man, your one sided on this. If fit people climb better, won't they too, climb better on a lighter outfit? I see your point about climbing makes a better climber, but your aguement is that light bikes carry fat riders?

  17. #17
    another retro grouch Mr IGH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Front Range, CO
    Posts
    2,574
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by born2bahick View Post
    ...but your arguement is that light bikes carry fat riders?
    OP asked if weight matters, I gave my opinion. My argument is that spending money on a light bike will not make you a better climber, it'll just waste the rider's money. If a rider wants to climb better, they need to ride trails with climbs. 5lbs is nothing, costs a fortune and sacrifices reliablity. BTW. I see lots of fatties on light bikes, isn't that why Gary Fishers always break

    MTB'ing isn't the only sport where participants fall under the spell of consumerism. Golf, roadies, fishing...the list is as long as there are activites. There is no subsititute for actual riding
    IGH's, Dyno Hubs, LED lights and old frames

  18. #18
    Hazardous biker Ricardo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Bogotá, Colombia
    My Bikes
    2005 Santa Cruz Blur Classic
    Posts
    602
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Short answer: No. In fact, the industry trend is that the average mountain bike is today heavier than 10 or 15 years ago.
    ---
    "Cyclists are open-minded. Cyclists are egalitarian. Cyclists share a fellowhip of the wheel that can overcome all political, social, racial and economic barriers. Except for recumbents."
    - Ted Costantino, cycling journalist

  19. #19
    Official Website Waterboy born2bahick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    a lot
    Posts
    3,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr IGH View Post
    OP asked if weight matters, I gave my opinion. My argument is that spending money on a light bike will not make you a better climber, it'll just waste the rider's money.
    You sir are entitled to that opinion.


    Quote Originally Posted by Mr IGH View Post
    If a rider wants to climb better, they need to ride trails with climbs.
    Agreed.



    Quote Originally Posted by Mr IGH View Post
    5lbs is nothing, costs a fortune and sacrifices reliablity.
    Not to all riders, Some think 5lbs is huge. Not a waste of money, and Lightweight doesn't spell unreliable for everyone.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr IGH View Post
    There is no subsititute for actual riding
    Agreed.

  20. #20
    another retro grouch Mr IGH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Front Range, CO
    Posts
    2,574
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Getting the bike to fit the rider is much more important than weight. A comfortable saddle that can be ridden for several hours before titanuim rails. Proper fitting bars before carbon fiber bars. Strong rims that allow the rider to take chances before superlight rims. Then take that money that could be spend on lighting the bike and buy several sets of tires and figure out what kind of tires work best for the rider and the conditions the rider experiences. Proper tires will help out climbing more than any other piece of gear.
    IGH's, Dyno Hubs, LED lights and old frames

  21. #21
    Official Website Waterboy born2bahick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    a lot
    Posts
    3,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr IGH View Post
    Getting the bike to fit the rider is much more important than weight. A comfortable saddle that can be ridden for several hours before titanuim rails. Proper fitting bars before carbon fiber bars. Strong rims that allow the rider to take chances before superlight rims. Then take that money that could be spend on lighting the bike and buy several sets of tires and figure out what kind of tires work best for the rider and the conditions the rider experiences. Proper tires will help out climbing more than any other piece of gear.

    Again I see what your are saying but there is no absolute, across the board. Your opinion is just that. It's not everyones answer. For some, " racer oriented XC style riders" weight is all. For people like Dminor, solid long travel geometry rawks. for people like Ed, " and Yourself evidently" parts that last are more important than weight.
    Edit not that all light parts are easy to break, depends on budget

  22. #22
    another retro grouch Mr IGH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Front Range, CO
    Posts
    2,574
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by born2bahick View Post
    ...Your opinion is just that....
    LOL, umm, this is the internet, I am right

    The things I am recommending will make a rider a better climber. A bike that weighs 5 lbs less will not make the rider a better climber. It really is that simple. I hate to see people waste their money on worthless upgrades, so I thought I'd throw it out there.

    There is equipment that will make a rider a better climber, lighter weight equipment isn't in the equation. Esp if the rider is a noob, BTW, they're the ones that always ask this question...Because that's what's marketed at them. The new SRAM XX kit include hydralic fork lockout, saves a couple grams. That's a breakthough that'll be a big help a rider climbing
    IGH's, Dyno Hubs, LED lights and old frames

  23. #23
    ÖöÖöÖöÖöÖö Dannihilator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Annandale, NJ.
    My Bikes
    2014 Surly Steamroller, 1977 Puch Pathfinder
    Posts
    18,793
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Are we talking xc bike light or DH/FR bike light? Because light weight isn't a constant when you put it in a total perspective.
    Strike like an eagle and sacrifice the dove.
    Words and Stuff.

  24. #24
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    Hecklah
    Posts
    10,932
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr IGH View Post
    LOL, umm, this is the internet, I am right

    The things I am recommending will make a rider a better climber. A bike that weighs 5 lbs less will not make the rider a better climber. It really is that simple. I hate to see people waste their money on worthless upgrades, so I thought I'd throw it out there.

    There is equipment that will make a rider a better climber, lighter weight equipment isn't in the equation. Esp if the rider is a noob, BTW, they're the ones that always ask this question...Because that's what's marketed at them. The new SRAM XX kit include hydralic fork lockout, saves a couple grams. That's a breakthough that'll be a big help a rider climbing

    I dropped 5lbs on my bike...same geometry...just different parts. It made me a better climber. How? I have more energy. Did it make me a better technical climber? No. Can I climb a grade at a faster rate and recover quicker? Yes.


    (when I say same geometry...I am comparing the previous fork at all settings for the most optimal side-by-side comparison...still, the weight made a huge difference...especially when I went from a 2.7" tire back down to a 2.4")

  25. #25
    omygodomygod TwinCam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    yay area ca
    Posts
    420
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you have to ask... then the answer is "no". Someday it may become "yes".

    It became important to me after I racked up a few nasty accidents. Now that my body is partly broken.... I'd stab a stranger gang initiation style to make my bike thee pounds lighter.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •