Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Hazardous biker Ricardo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Bogotá, Colombia
    My Bikes
    2005 Santa Cruz Blur Classic
    Posts
    602
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Women Specific Designs

    Marketing hype or female antropometrics miracle?

    I'm looking for a bike for my wife and yesterday went to the local specialized dealer to check the Specialized Myka HT but when comparing it to the 'male's' hardrock, the frame seemed identical to me.
    ---
    "Cyclists are open-minded. Cyclists are egalitarian. Cyclists share a fellowhip of the wheel that can overcome all political, social, racial and economic barriers. Except for recumbents."
    - Ted Costantino, cycling journalist

  2. #2
    Official Website Waterboy born2bahick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    a lot
    Posts
    3,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If your wife can fit a mans sized bike, then I would have her try as many as possible. the WSD are usually compromised on components to make up for WSD seat's narrow handlebars, shorter cranks, stems and generally a more upright seat tube angle. My mife is very small and needed a WSD small to fit her, thius equated to a mans X small which Specialized doesn't offer.

  3. #3
    Senior Member mystolenbikes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles
    My Bikes
    Specialized Hardrock
    Posts
    622
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My fiancé is 5'4" so bought her a 15" myka HT thinking that she'll fit fine after but after two ride I sold the bike because she ended up with crazy back pain funny part is sometimes she rides my med sized stumpjumper and she fits much better I gues because stumpy has more upright set up so I just ordered her the small myka FSR it'll be here Tuesday I'll take her to the bike shop to make sure she fits properly before I take the bike check back with me wed morning.
    By the way myka HT and the hardrock frames are not the same, top tube on hardrock curves up and myka curves down for more clearence also seat is much closer to the handle bar.

  4. #4
    Pint-Sized Gnar Shredder Zephyr11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Somewhere between heaven and hell
    My Bikes
    '09 Jamis Komodo, '09 Mirraco Blend One, '08 Cervelo P2C, '08 Specialized Ruby Elite, '07 Yeti AS-R SL, '07 DMR Drone
    Posts
    3,448
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Some differences. Different geometry...often a shorter top tube to make up for a woman having a shorter torso and longer legs than a man her same height. Couple other changes here and there. Bear in mind though, that not every woman is best off on a WSD bike. None of my mountain bikes, including an XC bike that fits like a dream, is a WSD bike. In fact, the two WSD bikes that I did try felt horrible.

  5. #5
    Senior Member jjbod1's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Dacula,Ga
    Posts
    402
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My wife who is 5'4 and not petite, and also not big by any means either, also only feels comfy on mens bikes. Both of her MTN bike frames are in the 15 In range,"and mens frames". Its funny I ran into this post, for today, she was trying out road bikes. She really likes, and looks like she is going to buy a Fuji Absolute 3.0, 17 in flat bar road bike, mens speced frame. We both also think its just a marketing thing. Honestly, male or female, you got to find what works, and is comfy for you

  6. #6
    ........ Face-Plant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    WNC, USA.
    My Bikes
    Surly - LHT, Stumpjumper FSR Comp
    Posts
    98
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Men/Woman both have arms, torso, legs, woman may have a bit more weight on the upper front, and lower back side, but I have seen men with some extra upper/lower-front/back weight as well. don't believe the hype, get whats works men or woman frames.

    Edit: In the late 80's early 90' I don't recall seeing men or woman specific MTB frames, but heck I am a man I would not have been looking at woman frames back then or now for that matter.
    Last edited by Face-Plant; 08-23-09 at 05:42 AM.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  7. #7
    Official Website Waterboy born2bahick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    a lot
    Posts
    3,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Face-Plant View Post
    Men/Woman both have arms, torso, legs, woman may have a bit more weight on the upper front, and lower back side, but I have seen men with some extra upper/lower-front/back weight as well. don't believe the hype, get whats works men or woman frames.

    Edit: In the late 80's early 90' I don't recall seeing men or woman specific MTB frames, but heck I am a man I would not have been looking at woman frames back then or now for that matter.
    Umm. Softer suspension Springs in coil sprung forks, on lower end bikes for lighter weight of the female body? You didn't have to worry about that in the late 80's huh? I just let My Sista ride my new long legged XC bike today, She is about the same height and leg length as me but I at "least" drop the air pressure from the shock and fork to accommodate her individual characteristics. This is some of the considerations that bike manufacturers are trying to address. Sometimes A wsd is better for a gal.

  8. #8
    team autobus loopybunny's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    northern california
    My Bikes
    2009 Trek 1.5; 2009 Trek 6000; 1995 Specialized Hardrock
    Posts
    297
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I test rode a Myka and hated it. I'm tall for a woman, but I don't have long legs like most women my height supposedly have. My height is in my torso and I have long arms. Doesn't do much for my self image to basically be told that my proportions (legs/torso/arms) are more like that of a man's, but oh well.

    Point is... the womens specific mountain bikes I tried didn't fit me so well because the seat is closer to the handlebars and it put me too upright. I ended up with a "men's" bike, but it's the second to the smallest size they make in that model.

    I guess I should mention that the Myka I tried was much lower end than the bike I ended up buying, which I'm sure also had a little do to with how good it felt riding it.

  9. #9
    Hazardous biker Ricardo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Bogotá, Colombia
    My Bikes
    2005 Santa Cruz Blur Classic
    Posts
    602
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the info guys. My wife is 5"4 too and this will be her first mountain bike. She used to ride a lot when she was still a kid and now she wants to resume her riding. Hope she doesn't kick my butt going uphill.
    ---
    "Cyclists are open-minded. Cyclists are egalitarian. Cyclists share a fellowhip of the wheel that can overcome all political, social, racial and economic barriers. Except for recumbents."
    - Ted Costantino, cycling journalist

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •