Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-08-04, 10:29 AM   #1
n00b
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Buying 1st real bike (sry for repetitive questions)

I have saved up about $1000 for a MTB/Hybrid. I have been looking for a full suspension but could consider a hard tail if I get persuaded that way. Been looking for a while and still have a big concern though...

My concern is which bikes come with components that will support my stature. I am big 6'4" and around 275 lbs. I have a few bikes in mind but am afraid the components may not support my weight.

I few bikes I have looked at include Trek Fuel 70, Specialized FSR XC, GT i-Drive 3.0, and the Kona Kikapu. Any other recommendations would be great too...

Thanks in advance for looking past my noob-ish post and helping out...

n00b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-04, 05:52 PM   #2
redfooj
pluralis majestatis
 
redfooj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: you rope
Bikes: 20 W/st.
Posts: 3,357
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 71 Post(s)
biggest consideration for weight is wheelset. make you sure you get some strong rims with thick spokes built proper
redfooj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-04, 06:12 PM   #3
Maelstrom 
Wood Licker
 
Maelstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Bikes: Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002 and specialized BMX
Posts: 16,885
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The fuel will not be very good. It flexes a lot in the rear and is SOFT. Even at its stiffest it is very soft and will sag. We are about the same weight and personally I could not ride the fuel
Maelstrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-04, 10:06 PM   #4
a2psyklnut
NCAA - DUAL CHAMPIONS!
 
a2psyklnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: From Sarasota, FL sitting in front of a computer spewing random thoughts!
Bikes: Intense Uzzi SL, Masi Speciale, Trek 3700 Nashbar Single Speed, Old Cilo Road frame
Posts: 7,964
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Forget the GT. Big riders and I Drives don't mix. I know several people who've destroyed the little dog bone link that makes an I-Drive work.

May I recommend a more FR oriented bike? You're big (like me) and FR bikes for us are like XC bikes.

Read : http://bikeforums.net/showthread.php?t=58652

Also, consider a bike like the KONA HOSS! It's a XC bike designed for Clydesdales (we riders over 200 lbs)

L8R
__________________
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "WOW, What a Ride!" - unknown
"Your Bike Sucks" - Sky Yaeger
a2psyklnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-04, 10:22 PM   #5
seely
The Rabbi
 
seely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 5,088
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
The Kikapu is an awesome bike for the money and will hold up to big riders if you are really bent on full suspension!
seely is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-04, 07:36 AM   #6
n00b
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)


The above link doesn't work for me. Says I do not have access to it.

Sorry for being a n00b again but what is FR? I am still learning the abbreviations...
n00b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-04, 11:37 AM   #7
DMulyava
Senior Member
 
DMulyava's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Maple (North of Toronto)
Bikes: 2004 Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Expert Disc
Posts: 195
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yes, as someone above mentioned consider the Kona Hoss.

FR = free ride. Free ride bikes are designed for abuse on big drops, jumps, etc., but can be good for aggressive cross country for riders such as yourself looking for something durable.
DMulyava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-04, 11:52 AM   #8
FoX Rider
The Man.
 
FoX Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sitting
Bikes: Haro Extreme X3 with Hayes Mags and Evil DRS
Posts: 1,070
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DMulyava
FR = free ride. Free ride bikes are designed for abuse on big drops, jumps, etc., but can be good for aggressive cross country for riders such as yourself looking for something durable.
Don't forget they weigh a sh*tload. Most around 40lbs.
FoX Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-04, 02:05 PM   #9
a2psyklnut
NCAA - DUAL CHAMPIONS!
 
a2psyklnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: From Sarasota, FL sitting in front of a computer spewing random thoughts!
Bikes: Intense Uzzi SL, Masi Speciale, Trek 3700 Nashbar Single Speed, Old Cilo Road frame
Posts: 7,964
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yeah, but put that in perspective. If you weight 160 lbs and have a 24 lb bike, the bike is 15% of rider weight. If you use that same percentage at 275 lbs, you "theoretically" should ride a 41.25 lb bike.

I know, I know that is merely a mathematical computation to theorize a rhetorical question.

But, I've broken my share of lightweight crap and would rather get stronger pushing a 40 lb full squish FR bike than a 25 lb lightweigh XC hardtail that I'll destroy in 3 rides!

L8R
__________________
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "WOW, What a Ride!" - unknown
"Your Bike Sucks" - Sky Yaeger
a2psyklnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-04, 10:30 PM   #10
Michi-biker
Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm in the same position as n00b and looking for my first real off-road bike. I have been looking at the one of the Giants and the Haros - both sub $1,000. I took your advice and looked at the Kona but no rear suspension, which begs the question - under what conditions do you need full suspension? So how about the Haro and Giant bikes?

Thanks
Michi-biker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-04, 11:54 AM   #11
bikered
bikerEd
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 127
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
full suspension is pretty much essential for downhill, less so for free ride, so if you're planning on 5riding mostly cross country, then I would go for a hardtail (no rear suspension) as you will get a better groupset, brakes etc. for the same money. Dont think that hardtails wont take jumps, they will if you get a good frame, but big jumps will be far less comfortable on a hardtail. Try to look for a 'hardcore hardtail', if your max is $1000, then you should be looking at a pretty nice bike e.g Kona Hoss, Muddyfox Molotov, or the Norco Sasquatch (not as good transmission as the other two, but made up for by strong frame)

Good luck and enjoy!
bikered is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-04, 11:55 AM   #12
bikered
bikerEd
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 127
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
And you can get a suspension seatpost to take lots of the sting out of a trail
bikered is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-04, 10:47 AM   #13
n00b
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Ok. I have the bike narrowed down to a Kona Kikapu (04/05) and a 04 Cannondale Jekyll 400. I know both are "good" bikes but is there anything I be concerned about between them?

The kicker on the Jekyll is, Its only an option if I can find on at a bike store in size XL... So also if anyone knows that there LBS has one could you let me know please.
n00b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-04, 11:54 AM   #14
mike2286
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New Jersey. Not my 1st choice!!!
Bikes: Klein Adept Comp & Klein Quantum Pro
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Careful of the Cannondale if you are a bigger dude!
mike2286 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-04, 09:38 PM   #15
n00b
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 4
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Why is that?
n00b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-04, 08:13 PM   #16
gmnstrunr37
Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Illinois
Bikes: Trek 6700
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Question here -- anyone notice any problems with the cables running under the frame on the Specialized Rockhoppers?
gmnstrunr37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:05 AM.