Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    panaracer fire xc pros

    i just recently switched to panaracer fire xc pros and i've felt the improvement in grip immediatly (over my specialized roll x's) but when i climb the rear wheel feels heavy, like it drags. does anyone else have these tires and do they notice the same effect? or do i have a defective tire? i have the tires facing the right way.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    87
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I switched the other way. Used to ride the XC Pro, and went to the Roll X Pro. Never looked back. The roll X seems to be a much more supple tire, especially in the sidewall. Seems to grip better in the corners especially. Might also just try playing with different air pressures to see what feels right.

  3. #3
    Keepin' it real since '84
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Oklahoma
    My Bikes
    Jamis Komodo
    Posts
    348
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i went from specialized enduros to fire xc pros. the first thing i noticed was how much lighter they were, so im surprised to hear you say they feel heavy. did you get the 2.1's or the 1.9's? kevlar bead or wire? either way, i think the 2.1 kevlars are a huge improvement in weight than my old specialized, and im sure that the roll-x's are about the same as the enduros as far as wieght, but i've never ridden them. i feel that the xc pros have a better grip at lower pressures and have much much less rolling resistance. i ride mine with the back one reversed for better grip, like its suggested. is that what you meant by the "right" way?

  4. #4
    Senior Member headn4thehills's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    72
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I never noticed any difference when i switched from roll-x to the xc pro's. Traction is a hell of alot better, but as far as resistance goes, I noticed no difference.

  5. #5
    randomness inc. HDTVKSS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Sydney Australia
    Posts
    988
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think they are a great tyre ( i use the 1.8). i was using Michelin Wildgrippers but had a near accident every time i transitioned into a corner ( horrible transition grip, will never ever use them again.)

    The Fire XC Pros i find are presure sensitive but are a fantastic tyre. i run both mine in the " forward" direction and i dont think ive noticed any issues with a heavy rear wheels. the only concession i had to make was to run about 30 psi in the front and about 35 in the rear to get the best handling out of them (they specify a min of 35 on the tyre but so far so good....)
    You don't need proof when you have instinct.
    Im on the Floyd Landis Jack Daniels training program.

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i run the tires in the direction the arrows tell me to and they said aramid bead on them. i dont know if that means kevlar or wire. they are the 2.1s. maybe i jsut got a defective tire or something

  7. #7
    DEADBEEF khuon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
    My Bikes
    1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
    Posts
    12,155
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    One thing to note about the Panaracer Fire XC Pros is that in addition to coming in two different sizes and two different bead types, they also come in two differen't TPIs. The OEM versions are 60TPI and are kind of sucky. The 120TPI versions are much nicer, roll better and hook up more aggressively.
    1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte OCP Club Member
    "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    39
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    There's a lot of problems with the 60TPI version, they are a junk tire, read the reviews at mtbr. Make sure to get the 128TPI from Japan, not the 60TPI from Taiwan. the Taiwan version usually sells for less.
    Save on Bike Parts and Accessories at EyeBike
    Search many online bike stores at once and find the best deals on all your favorite bike gear.

  9. #9
    Senior Member MudPie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,874
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by EyeBike2
    There's a lot of problems with the 60TPI version, they are a junk tire, read the reviews at mtbr. Make sure to get the 128TPI from Japan, not the 60TPI from Taiwan. the Taiwan version usually sells for less.
    On their website, Panaracer mentions the 127 tpi (good, Made in Japan) and the OEM 66 tpi (bad, made in Taiwan. Some online dealers sell the 66 tpi. Some dealers specifically say "127 tpi". You can get the 127 tpi for about $22. Caveat emptor (buyer beware).

    I use the 2.1's and find their traction and predictablilty far outweigh the weight of the tire. Needless to say, I don't race and could shed 10 lbs myself, so some grams on the tire don't make much difference to me.

  10. #10
    Senior Member iamthetas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    colonial heights Va
    My Bikes
    Devinci Guzzler, 04 Canadian version
    Posts
    1,200
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    what Psi are you running on the rear? when I switched from Trailblaster to Cinders I had to lower my pressure on my front a bit to compensate for the thicker tread and you may need to adjust your pressure up a little to make them a little less spongy so they do not feel like they are dragging as you climb. they are similar(fire) to the trailblaster in that they can feel a little spongy on climbs at low psi due to soft casing but they are an excellent tire
    for the creation was subjected to futility,not willingly , but because of Him who subjected it in hope...that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. Romans 8:20-29
    the truth may not always be popular but its always true
    http://mysite.verizon.net/vzer3fnu/p...pcomingevents/

  11. #11
    Senior Member clfjmpr44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    My Bikes
    2000-Canary Yellow Trek 1000, 1999 Specialized Stumpjumper
    Posts
    920
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hey guys, picked up a pair of XC pros from Jenson yesterday. The website said 127, but the package they came in said neither. They do say made in Japan though, is that the end all be all that I got the "good ones?"
    Thanks
    2009 Salsa El Santo
    2006 Jake the Snake with Sidecar
    2005 Custom Ti Habanero Team Issue
    1999 Specialized Stumpjumper
    1985 "Race Red" Trek 660 Single Speed
    "There comes a time in one's life, when you must take a risk, or live forever with your dreams." [Late Extreme Skier Trevor Petersen]

  12. #12
    Senior Member mindbogger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    933
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by clfjmpr44
    Hey guys, picked up a pair of XC pros from Jenson yesterday. The website said 127, but the package they came in said neither. They do say made in Japan though, is that the end all be all that I got the "good ones?"
    Thanks
    DId you get the coloured side walls? or the plain black ones?!
    00' Cannondale R1000
    01' Devinci Chilipepper

    When sh*t hits the fan, everything I'm not, made me everything I am.

  13. #13
    Senior Member clfjmpr44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    My Bikes
    2000-Canary Yellow Trek 1000, 1999 Specialized Stumpjumper
    Posts
    920
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    They have the red sidewalls
    2009 Salsa El Santo
    2006 Jake the Snake with Sidecar
    2005 Custom Ti Habanero Team Issue
    1999 Specialized Stumpjumper
    1985 "Race Red" Trek 660 Single Speed
    "There comes a time in one's life, when you must take a risk, or live forever with your dreams." [Late Extreme Skier Trevor Petersen]

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    saint petersburg, florida
    My Bikes
    C-dale R700, stumpjumer HT, Bianchi Pista, KHS solo one, Giant quasar fixed tt bike,
    Posts
    37
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have used both the 1.8's and the 2.1's and they are the best tyres ever. I will never ride anything else. They hold up in any terrain I'm brave enough to ride and are light enought to race. Best tyres ever. Period.

  15. #15
    Senior Member clfjmpr44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    My Bikes
    2000-Canary Yellow Trek 1000, 1999 Specialized Stumpjumper
    Posts
    920
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Are the 1.8s to skinny for XC? I was coming from a 1.9 ground control and definitely hesitated before stepping up to the 2.1. I looked at the 1.8s, but I was concerned it was more of a commute tire. Is this assumption wrong?
    2009 Salsa El Santo
    2006 Jake the Snake with Sidecar
    2005 Custom Ti Habanero Team Issue
    1999 Specialized Stumpjumper
    1985 "Race Red" Trek 660 Single Speed
    "There comes a time in one's life, when you must take a risk, or live forever with your dreams." [Late Extreme Skier Trevor Petersen]

  16. #16
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    17
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ive been riding the 2.1s since the end of last (oz) summer and i'm still really impressed by their handling in nearly all conditions..i tend to run them at at least 40psi though, as when i swapped from hutch pythons i did notice a bit of drag...i dont race though so its not really a concern considering how well they corner and climb.

  17. #17
    snow DjRider04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Henniker, USA
    My Bikes
    Rootbeer Bullit, stock......soon to be a transgold V10 w/shivers
    Posts
    794
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    whoa......128TPI.....the tires im running now are 30 or 35TPI! I ran them once on my old bike, thought they were great tires, didnt notice any sluggishness, but I was running them on a really really really light wheelset.

  18. #18
    Time for a change. stapfam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
    My Bikes
    Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
    Posts
    19,915
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by clfjmpr44
    Are the 1.8s to skinny for XC? I was coming from a 1.9 ground control and definitely hesitated before stepping up to the 2.1. I looked at the 1.8s, but I was concerned it was more of a commute tire. Is this assumption wrong?
    Depends on your weight. I am only 11 stone and use the 1.8's. A friend of mine is 13 stone and prefers the 1.8's to the 2.1's, both for grip and confidence, but boy does he wear his tyres out quick. I find that anything over 1.95, in any make of tyre, will skate across damp grass or slightly wet soil, so the 1.8's are pefect for me. Tyre pressures? 45 front and 50 rear. any less and snakebites a good possibility at speed. Much more than this(Extra 5lbs f or r) and you might as well use slicks.

  19. #19
    blurboy mwangarch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Corte Madera, CA
    My Bikes
    Road: LeMond Zurich, Medici, Cannondale 3.0 set up as single speed; MTB: Blur, Bridgestone MB0, hoping for a new SS soon!
    Posts
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I set up my Blur with 1.8 Fire XC's. For dry conditions, you can't go wrong. I'm pretty light, less than 140 lbs and the rear wore out in a year doing what I consider fairly light riding, about 30% road, 70% dirt/rock mostly on Mt. Tam. You can't beat the lack of weight!

    No problem with traction uphill, cornering.

    I'm currently riding a 1.8 in the front and a Hutchinson Python Gold in the rear which is pretty good, too.

    I experimented with Stan's NoTubes...works pretty well except the Panaracers are more porous than you would believe and the sealant had a tendency to dry out quickly...had a terrible experience in the Sierra Nevada this summer with a blown seal, 90 degree weather, the only wet spot in the area and tons of mosquitos...switched the front back to a tube but am still running Stan's on the rear....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •