Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-15-04, 11:48 PM   #1
recneps345
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Bikes:
Posts: 1,645
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
is a women's trek alright for man?

I just bought a trek 6700 and I am really liking it. I liked it so much I suggested it to a friend. He got on ebay and found a 2004 trek 6700 but it is the wsd(women's design). He got the bike for $500, are there any major differences between his and mine, they are both 18". Thanks spencer
recneps345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-04, 11:54 PM   #2
khuon
DEADBEEF
 
khuon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
Posts: 12,242
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by recneps345
I just bought a trek 6700 and I am really liking it. I liked it so much I suggested it to a friend. He got on ebay and found a 2004 trek 6700 but it is the wsd(women's design). He got the bike for $500, are there any major differences between his and mine, they are both 18". Thanks spencer
Does it fit? That's the proof in the pudding. Who cares about the label. If he's really concerned about it, he can always paint over the "WSD" label or something. To compare the geometries, you might want to check out Trek's published geometry specifications. Other differences will probably also include shorter cranks and shorter stem. Here's a side-by-side frame and component comparison.
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
khuon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-04, 12:23 AM   #3
FoX Rider
The Man.
 
FoX Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Sitting
Bikes: Haro Extreme X3 with Hayes Mags and Evil DRS
Posts: 1,070
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The color.
FoX Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-04, 01:14 AM   #4
recneps345
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Bikes:
Posts: 1,645
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
is it just me or is the only difference the saddle. the crank and stem were exactly the same on khuon's reply. thanks for the info, if anyone else sees anything different besides the saddle, please tell. i cant believe the only difference is the saddle.
recneps345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-04, 01:24 AM   #5
khuon
DEADBEEF
 
khuon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
Posts: 12,242
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by recneps345
is it just me or is the only difference the saddle. the crank and stem were exactly the same on khuon's reply. thanks for the info, if anyone else sees anything different besides the saddle, please tell. i cant believe the only difference is the saddle.
Download the PDF file for the geometry and you'll notice sizing differences such as relative shorter effective toptubes, as well as head/seat tube angle differences between the 6700 and 6700WSD frames. Of course the frame sizes are different as 6700 comes in 15.5"-21.5" in 2" increments while the 6700WSD goes from 14"-18" in 2" increments so it's a little hard to compare but even through interpolation, you can tell that the WSD frames are more "compact" (I'm not talking just sloping top-tube here).

Okay... I will have to say that there's really no decent way to cut and paste out of a PDF reliably. Anyways... here's an extracted section that should illustrate what I was getting at.

Code:
model   frame   size    head    seat    EFF top         chain           bottom          offset          wheelbase       trail           stand over
                        angle   angle   tube            stay            bracket
===================================================================================================================================================
8500    S       15.5"   71.0   73.5   55.0 / 21.7     42.4 / 16.7     29.7 / 11.7     4.2 / 1.7       103.0 / 40.6    7.0 / 2.8       70.6 / 27.8
8000    M       17.5"   71.0   73.0   58.8 / 23.1     42.4 / 16.7     29.7 / 11.7     4.2 / 1.7       106.4 / 41.9    7.0 / 2.8       74.0 / 29.1
6700    L       19.5"   71.0   73.0   62.5 / 24.6     42.4 / 16.7     29.7 / 11.7     4.2 / 1.7       110.1 / 43.4    7.0 / 2.8       77.7 / 30.6
        XL      21.5"   71.0   72.5   64.1 / 25.2     42.4 / 16.7     30.0 / 11.8     4.2 / 1.7       111.4 / 43.9    7.0 / 2.8       81.6 / 32.1

6700    WSD WXS 14"     70.0   75.0   51.8 / 20.4     42.4 / 16.7     28.9 / 11.4     4.2 / 1.6       101.8 / 40.1    7.8 / 3.1       67.0 / 26.4
4500    WSD WS  16"     70.0   74.0   53.2 / 21.0     42.4 / 16.7     28.9 / 11.4     4.2 / 1.6       102.3 / 40.3    7.8 / 3.1       70.1 / 27.6
        WSD WM  18"     70.0   73.5   56.3 / 22.2     42.4 / 16.7     29.3 / 11.6     4.2 / 1.6       105.1 / 41.4    7.8 / 3.1       74.1 / 29.2
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122

Last edited by khuon; 08-16-04 at 01:54 AM.
khuon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-04, 07:52 AM   #6
recneps345
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Bikes:
Posts: 1,645
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for the help. I see the numbers now. I compared the 18 women with 17.5 men. It seemed all to be small differences, but can someone tell if these small differences are likely to make a difference. thanks
recneps345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-04, 12:16 PM   #7
khuon
DEADBEEF
 
khuon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
Posts: 12,242
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by recneps345
Thanks for the help. I see the numbers now. I compared the 18 women with 17.5 men. It seemed all to be small differences, but can someone tell if these small differences are likely to make a difference. thanks
I think they will. Take the effective top-tube for instance. That's a 1" reach difference. To make up for it, you would have to lengthen the stem by a good 20mm which can effect weight distribution and steering. Also, notice the trail. That .3" longer trail on the WSD frame will make the bike more stable but less nimble. It will be slower in steering. You'd be surprised at how minute changes in certain portions of the geometry can effect handling and fit.
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
khuon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-04, 08:47 PM   #8
recneps345
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Bikes:
Posts: 1,645
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
khuon, i really appreciate you looking everything up and helping me out. I really appreciate it. spencer
recneps345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:46 PM.