Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-19-10, 09:22 PM   #1
xfimpg
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
xfimpg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 3,089
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Crank length dilemma

Howdy

If you have 172.5mm cranks on your roadie, should you go for 170 or 175 on your mtb?

I'm thinking 170 to promote easier spinning due to the shorter arm length.

Anyone have any recommendations...?

EDIT: 172.5mm for mtbs tend to be very expensive so i'm staying with standard lengths.

Last edited by xfimpg; 03-19-10 at 09:28 PM.
xfimpg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-10, 09:27 PM   #2
dejock
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Bikes:
Posts: 47
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I run 170mm cranks on my 1x8. Ive had no pedal strikes since.
dejock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-10, 10:25 PM   #3
Zephyr11
Pint-Sized Gnar Shredder
 
Zephyr11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere between heaven and hell
Bikes: '09 Jamis Komodo, '09 Mirraco Blend One, '08 Cervelo P2C, '08 Specialized Ruby Elite, '07 Yeti AS-R SL, '07 DMR Drone
Posts: 3,549
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
175 is standard. Most riders go a little longer for mountain.
Zephyr11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-10, 10:26 PM   #4
electrik
Single-serving poster
 
electrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Bikes:
Posts: 5,098
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
175... there is less spinning off-road and more torque needed, the extra bit of leverage helps.
electrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-10, 11:30 PM   #5
sscyco
Fool O' crap
 
sscyco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: spokane
Bikes: Are faster than yours.
Posts: 1,230
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
175 is standard - last year I switched to 172.5 (after over 10 years with 175) and it was a good thing. Typically I was a masher - took every climb in my middle ring - but figured out that was just taking my knees out and not making me any faster. With the lower leverage and higher cadence I find I am a bit faster. On a DH bike 170 (mine) or even 165 are common - because of clearance and the lack of needed torque. For you I would go with stock and change later - if needed.
__________________
sscyco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-10, 05:52 AM   #6
stapfam
Time for a change.
 
stapfam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Posts: 19,915
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Difference between 170 and 175 is 1/4". If you can tell the difference- you would have to be a Pro that needs the ultimate in bike fit.

Road bikes- 165 for spinning and mountains- 172.5 for flat rides. Still can't tell the difference but the bikes are set up for the different uses. Mountain bikes and 170 on all. Probably because the 170's were on offer without an alternative at the same price.
__________________
How long was I in the army? Five foot seven.


Spike Milligan
stapfam is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:49 AM.