Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    309
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    i am 5'9" tall. 15.5" or 17.5" frame size for trek 6000?

    i am 5 feet, 9 and 1/3 inches tall without shoes. 32 and 1/3 inches cycling inseam without shoes. i'm chosing between 15.5" and 17.5". i care for ergonomic fit and not racer's posture. perfect fit is very important for me. sadly its tougher to fit me since i'm out of shape at 218 lbs (hopefully new bike will change that ). your advice will be greatly appreciated. thanks.

    http://www.trekbikes.com/us/en/bikes...6_series/6000/

  2. #2
    Redheaded Stepchild samburger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    GA, USA
    My Bikes
    A fat tire & a skinny tire & two others I loaned out
    Posts
    1,909
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Take each size for a ride & stick with the one that feels better. I would think the 17.5" would be a perfect fit, since I'm just short of 5'11 & 18" is my preference. You could also find a LBS that offers the Specialized BG FIT Service. I don't know if that would be practical for everyone though..there's only one in Georgia & I happen to live 10 minutes from it. Maybe where you live has more options though.
    just a n00b with an ego

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    309
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    interesting...i've never heard of that before so i checked it out

    http://cdn.specialized.com/bc/micros...ml#/Experience

    i have a specialized dealer 3 minutes from my house...i'll ask them about the service...and then decide between the trek 6000 and comparable rockhopper model...see what's got the better fitting geometry

  4. #4
    Redheaded Stepchild samburger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    GA, USA
    My Bikes
    A fat tire & a skinny tire & two others I loaned out
    Posts
    1,909
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Another thing I should have mentioned is that the BG Fit deal is absolute top of the line bike-fitting. And it's probably pretty expensive...I'm really not sure about cost. If you're just getting into mountain biking, it's not really necessary--any non box-store dealer can help you decide on what size frame you need & help you with the adjustments. The owner of my LBS simply looked at me & adjusted the bike seat to the exact right height to text ride some bikes. And he (the BG Fit certified owner) told me exactly what I told you: test ride them both & buy the one that feels better. So if you have a Trek dealer nearby, that may actually be the better place to start.
    just a n00b with an ego

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    3,684
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm 5'7" with a 32" inseam and I ride a 17.5" Gary Fisher MTB and an 18" Salsa A La Carte.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    SW Michigan
    My Bikes
    Trek Disc 4300
    Posts
    28
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm just around 5'6" and ride a Trek D4300. It's a 16" frame. I'd imagine you'd want a longer bike than that. The best way to tell of course is to ride them both.

  7. #7
    Stealing Spokes since 82' Fizzaly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Boy-z, Ideeeho
    My Bikes
    87' Kuwahara, Hardrock, Trek Fuel SLR
    Posts
    1,849
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Unless over the years trek has changed that much my 17" 8000 fits really small im 5'9"

  8. #8
    Senior Member Zaneluke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Germantown MD
    My Bikes
    Trek Y-5
    Posts
    277
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am 5'9" and ride a 17.5 Trek. It is a perfect fit.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    309
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Zaneluke View Post
    I am 5'9" and ride a 17.5 Trek. It is a perfect fit.
    how's the stand over for your mountain bike

    my boys brush the TT on my hybrid which has SO of 75.4. i can comfortably straddle when resting. the 17.5" trek has a 76.2 cm SO + tires fatter than 700c. seems to cut it close but i'll give it a try. thanks!

  10. #10
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am 5'9 (33 inch inseam and ride a 19"). I like the longer top tube that the 19" provides. I hate being squenched up on a bike. I do not do super technical off roading on it just normal XC stuff. The longer frame shines if you mix any pavement riding in with the dirt.
    If I was going to be doing steeper decents or drop offs I would go to the next smaller size.

  11. #11
    Senior Member mzeffex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO
    My Bikes
    2011 S-works Tarmac SL3 Red, 2009 Fuji SLM 2.0 XT, 1986 Lotus Grand Prix Luxe single speed, 2012 Blue Norcross, Torelli Tipo Uno
    Posts
    8,029
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm 5 9 and ride a 17 specialized and it's way too small.

    That said, ymmv
    Quote Originally Posted by rjones28 View Post
    Are they talking about spectators feeding the cyclists? You know, like don't feed the bears?

  12. #12
    Its Freakin HammerTime!!! C_Heath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Off the back @ 188 BPM's
    My Bikes
    2008 Felt F3 :)
    Posts
    2,251
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    5'9 and ride 17.5 and I COULD ride a 18.5 but I like to be able to throw the bike around a little more.

    stick with the 17.5
    Quote Originally Posted by rousseau View Post
    I don't like any other exercise or sports, really.
    ....

    http://www.xxcycle.com/logo_w150h100/bmc.jpg

  13. #13
    Riding like its 1990 thenomad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    IE, SoCal
    Posts
    3,628
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Zaneluke View Post
    I am 5'9" and ride a 17.5 Trek. It is a perfect fit.
    Same here. Size of frame says "medium". This is on a Fuel 80
    My blog about rides, bikes and builds: ridesgoneby.blogspot.com

  14. #14
    Canadian eh?
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    2012 Trek Madone 5.2
    Posts
    1,730
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    17.5 is likely the proper "general" fit...but of course, ride em both and see what you prefer.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    309
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    thanks guys. my prior bike was a trek 7.2 fx 17.5" with a TT of 55 cm just like the 15.5" 6000. the TT of the 17.5" 6000 is 4 cm longer. this is why i was unsure of which one to go with. i assume the difference in sizing is due to the difference in fit between a hybrid and a mtn bike (mtn is less upright and more aggressive i presume).

    thanks for the "general" guideline of 17.5" as the way to go. definitely, i will try out both sizes in person and see which one feels best because we're all unique. i'm pretty sure i'll go with the 17.5" too.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •