Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    2,347
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    So it's about time to decide, which of these two kinds of bikes would you recommend?

    Build a "fat bike" like the Surly Pugsley or a regular front suspension MTB? Budget will be ~$700. I assume I'd probably just buy the regular MTB or build the fat bike from parts I acquire.

    This will be my first time really getting into MTBing so it's tough for me to say with experience, but just assume my terrain consists of typical mid-western stuff, I think. I don't Think we have anything crazy or super rocky around here. I know a front suspension bike would be faster on downhill sections of singletrack, but I'm mostly just looking for fun factor, fast or slow. A fat bike seems like it would be able to tackle more, but at a slower pace. For those who have tried both style bikes, what did you find more fun to ride on various terrain?

  2. #2
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    2010 Jamis Parker, 2005 Jamis Komodo, 1998 Jamis Komodo, 198? Raleigh Pointe, 1978 Schwinn Super Le Tour 12.2
    Posts
    10,930
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Pugsley / Wildfire bikes are targeted toward snow, mud, sand. I think it could be an interesting "slow" bike to ride on really stoney terrain with low psi...but if it were my only ride...def go with a more standard ride.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •