Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    3,335
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Talk me into buying a FS, not a hardtail (Motobecane Fly)

    I'm about to buy a mountain bike. I used to ride an intro-level 30lbs Gary Fisher bike which was eventually stolen =(, and since then I've been a road cyclist.

    Am going to get back into mtn biking. I love climbing, but don't enjoy descents too much - I'm not a particularly strong downhiller, but I can keep up with all but the racers on hairy descents. Amongst nonracers, I'm considered a good climber (I train with competitive road cyclists.)

    I was going to buy a light hardtail like the Motobecane Fly, but after hearing folks swear by their FS bikes, I'm wondering if I should go that route.

    THe one time I rode a FS, it was pretty sweet, but again, I'm not a ferocious (and will never be) downhill rider. No big drops for me, but somewhat challenging singletrack will be expected.

    What do you think I should go for - FS (to climb FAST) or hardtail?

  2. #2
    Redheaded Stepchild samburger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    GA, USA
    My Bikes
    A fat tire & a skinny tire & two others I loaned out
    Posts
    1,909
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If climbing is your game, hardtail. The compromise you make with w FS (though smaller & smaller of a compromise with advancing suspension technology, from what I hear) is pedal-bob when you climb. For most people, the descent is the icing on top, so the slight pedal-bob on the way up is worth the smooth ride down. But for you it would be the opposite--you would want a HT so that you can fully enjoy the snappy, responsive climb, & then manage with the bumpier ride down.
    just a n00b with an ego

  3. #3
    Senior Member Smallguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,331
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    depends on your budget

    a good Fs bike will have a rear shock with a pedaling platform.... they reduce pedal bob when climbing and reduce the amount or force lost to the suspension as you drive the pedals down

    if you looking at spend 2k like the fly I'm not sure of many bikes with the pedaling platform

    of course you will also take a bit of a hit on components unless you also were to buy the http://www.bikesdirect.com/products/...ntom_teamX.htm

    to be honest if I were you and not sure I'd buy the bikes direct FS bike although the fly ti bike is also very sexy.... worst case you can sell the frame but a hard tail and swap over all the top shelf components

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    21
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just replaced my FS bike with a hardtail. I'm the same - I'm not into going crazy fast downhill. Thus far I'm actually just as fast on my hardtail as I was on the FS on downhills, which I guess means I really wasn't pushing the limits of my FS. It was also cheaper with better components, and I'm about 20% faster on climbs all around. It's more pleasant on smooth trails and trails with small rocks (no pedal bob and 29" wheels make a big difference).

    I'd say stick with the hardtail unless you think you want to go fast downhill or hit big rock gardens. Those Fly frames look pretty sweet.

    And FWIW, I got a bikesdirect bike. I practically took the whole bike apart and put it back together well greased and torqued right. So far it looks like the only actual problem is that the front wheel is a little dished, but for $800 I got a great bike (Windsor 29er Pro) and it'll cost $20 to have my wheel trued at my LBS. As long as you're comfortable with a wrench, Bikes Direct is no big deal IMO.
    Last edited by gumbytex; 03-17-11 at 09:01 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •