Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-30-04, 11:36 AM   #1
drumbum
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
drumbum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: Moots CX, Redline CX
Posts: 315
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Difference in Rear Suspension?

Hi all,
I'm curious as to the advantages and disadvantages of the rear suspension on these two bikes:

Kona Dawgmatic
and
Santa Cruz Blur Ano 04

What is the difference between the two types of suspension? Which do you prefer, and why?

Thanks!
drumbum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-04, 11:51 AM   #2
DjRider04
snow
 
DjRider04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Henniker, USA
Bikes: Rootbeer Bullit, stock......soon to be a transgold V10 w/shivers
Posts: 794
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Two totally different bikes. One is a faux fourbar(the kona)......the other has a virtual pivot point that stresses the chain a lot. You wont need an SPV shock for the vpp, but for the Kona to pedal well, it would indeed help. The axle paths are also quite different, and arent going to handle the same way. Both are very nice bikes, but what kind of riding are you going to be doing. If I just want to do a majority of easy trail riding, not much climbing, flow......id get the Kona. If I was going to be doing a lot of climbing, id get the Blur. Personally, I dont like the feel of faux fourbar.......
DjRider04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-04, 11:52 AM   #3
DjRider04
snow
 
DjRider04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Henniker, USA
Bikes: Rootbeer Bullit, stock......soon to be a transgold V10 w/shivers
Posts: 794
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Youre also talking about a HUGE price difference.......didnt notice how inexpensive the Kona was.
DjRider04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-04, 12:08 PM   #4
drumbum
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
drumbum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Bikes: Moots CX, Redline CX
Posts: 315
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DjRider04
Two totally different bikes. One is a faux fourbar(the kona)......the other has a virtual pivot point that stresses the chain a lot. You wont need an SPV shock for the vpp, but for the Kona to pedal well, it would indeed help. The axle paths are also quite different, and arent going to handle the same way. Both are very nice bikes, but what kind of riding are you going to be doing. If I just want to do a majority of easy trail riding, not much climbing, flow......id get the Kona. If I was going to be doing a lot of climbing, id get the Blur. Personally, I dont like the feel of faux fourbar.......
Why don't you like the feel of the faux fourbar? I can't feel a difference the times ive tried the Kona.

I'm going to be doing a majority of singletracks with some moderate climbing.
drumbum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-04, 12:09 PM   #5
DjRider04
snow
 
DjRider04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Henniker, USA
Bikes: Rootbeer Bullit, stock......soon to be a transgold V10 w/shivers
Posts: 794
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If you had enough, id definetly go with the Blur.....but if you dont, the Kona is a great bike. I just like the VPP setup, doesnt bob when you get outta the saddle.
DjRider04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-04, 12:36 PM   #6
Maelstrom 
Wood Licker
 
Maelstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Bikes: Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002 and specialized BMX
Posts: 16,885
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by younghistorians
Why don't you like the feel of the faux fourbar? I can't feel a difference the times ive tried the Kona.

I'm going to be doing a majority of singletracks with some moderate climbing.
It easiest to notice the weakness of the faux bar when going fast and slamming on the brakes. Otherwise, with propedal, the konas feel decent. VPP is a newer and better pedalling technology thouigh
Maelstrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:07 PM.