Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-11-04, 12:44 PM   #1
andrewf20
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Bikes: Specialized stumpjumper comp '04
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
HI all,

Which would you's recommend:

Kona Kula 04 (Easton frame, XT rear, raceface evolve XC front mech, Fox Vaniila forxs)
Stumjumper Comp 04 (XTR rear, LX front mechs, Fox forx RL, deore brakes)
Giant XTC1 04 (XT rear, XT hollowtech 2 front mechs, Skareb forks, gobi wingflex saddle)

Im in 3 minds at the moment.

Cheers.
andrewf20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-04, 01:58 PM   #2
seely
The Rabbi
 
seely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 5,088
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
I have the Stumpjumper Comp ('04) but I would definately recommend getting the rim brake version. If you get the rim brake version, you get a Fox F80x which is a $775 fork with the Terralogic intertia valve. Or hmm, you can get crappy low end disc brakes with a $450 fork. See what I'm saying?

The Stumpjumper handles amazingly well, and if you get the Fox F80x fork, it blows away what any other bike is coming with in that price range. Specialized's geometry doesn't work for everyone but if you are like me with long arms, it will be perfect. The handling from my perspective is nothing short of amazing.

The XTC is ok, not a bad frame, but a Skareb? Sorry, but they suck, and forks are expensive to upgrade after you have the bike.

Kula I'm sure is a nice bike, but Kona has never impressed me with their XC bikes... the geometry never feels right to me for climbing/racing. I think part of it might be their shorter top tubes which don't work for me at all.
seely is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-04, 03:08 PM   #3
stapfam
Time for a change.
 
stapfam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
Bikes: Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
Posts: 19,915
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by seely
I
Kula I'm sure is a nice bike, but Kona has never impressed me with their XC bikes... the geometry never feels right to me for climbing/racing. I think part of it might be their shorter top tubes which don't work for me at all.
Kona's are not noted for their short Top Tube, so you either had a frame too small, or wrongly set up. For those of us that have Kona's, they are ideal bikes, so get a ride on one to see how it feels
stapfam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-04, 02:21 PM   #4
Juniper
Digs technical steeps
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 510
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by stapfam
Kona's are not noted for their short Top Tube, so you either had a frame too small, or wrongly set up. For those of us that have Kona's, they are ideal bikes, so get a ride on one to see how it feels
I've never had the sense of a short top tube on my '05 Kula, either. The Easton Ultralight race tubing is awesome and the 100mm Fox Vanilla fork is perfect for me. I find my Kula to be very flickable without being the least bit twitchy and it climbs like a rocket!
Juniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-04, 08:25 PM   #5
seely
The Rabbi
 
seely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 5,088
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by stapfam
Kona's are not noted for their short Top Tube, so you either had a frame too small, or wrongly set up. For those of us that have Kona's, they are ideal bikes, so get a ride on one to see how it feels
They are shortER (in comparison to my Stumpjumper) I never said they are short.
seely is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-04, 12:00 AM   #6
DjRider04
snow
 
DjRider04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Henniker, USA
Bikes: Rootbeer Bullit, stock......soon to be a transgold V10 w/shivers
Posts: 794
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Or you could get the Stumpjumper comp disk.....and get a Stratos ID cart. for the Fox fork....or a Mojo cart.

Or buy some used Avid Mechs for the Comp......ITS A WORLD OF POSSIBILITIES!!!1111

I feel like WIlly WOnkaa!
DjRider04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-04, 06:52 AM   #7
Aus_MTB
Brisbane Rider
 
Aus_MTB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brisbane
Bikes: 2005 Giant XTC 2 LE
Posts: 216
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Well since both of the other two bikes have already have comments made i should probably say something about the xtc 1. I havent ridden one myself (i have an xtc 2 le) but i was chatting to someone at my lbs who has one and it has been performing really well. In saying that though i have heard alot of good things about the Kona
Aus_MTB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-04, 08:03 PM   #8
itwonder
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think you have to ride them because the Specialized and Kona are very different fits. If you are tall like me, I think you will find the Stumpjumper to be a better fit. I found the Kona to be too cramped for my taste. It's a personal thing...all are great bikes.
itwonder is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:36 AM.