Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Bike Junkie roccobike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    South of Raleigh, North of New Hill, East of Harris Lake, NC
    My Bikes
    Giant OCR-C, Specialized Tarmac, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, Stumpjumper Comp, 05 Rockhopper, 88 & 92Nishiki Ariel, 01 Bianchi Campione, 87 Centurion Ironman, 92 Paramount, 97 Lemond
    Posts
    9,001
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Mavic 117s or No Name Wheels? Which to keep

    I need to make a choice for my son's 05 Rockhopper. I just upgraded the old bike to discs with some BB7s. Through some wheel replacement on my bikes, I now have a choice between two sets of wheels to use. The first set came off my 05 FSR XC. They are Mavic 117s with a Shimano rear hub and a Specialized Stout front hub. The 117s are the lowest level Mavics and do not have reinforce eyelets.
    The other set looks like a house brand, maybe from Performance. They are a semi-aero type rim, laced to some Pivit brand hubs, front and rear. One nice thing about this set is, they have reinforced eyelets.
    So which is the better set, the name brand, low end rim or the no-name with better construction? IMHO, the Mavics have better hubs. The Pivit hubs closely resemble hubs I've seen on inexpensive bikes that are the first level to have disc brakes.
    Your thoughts?
    Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator

  2. #2
    Senior Member Dilberto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    876
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Mavic XM117 is a good, solid wheel. Anything branded by Performance Bike is likely to be nearly crap.
    2001 Cannondale Bad Boy Ultra - Shimano XTR/SRAM X0; Magura, Velocity Blunt SL
    2012 Trek Superfly 100 Pro - SRAM XX; Bontrager RXXXL; Easton Haven; Rock Shox SID XX

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •