Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Senior Member LesterOfPuppets's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, USA
    My Bikes
    My War
    Posts
    19,418
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    7 Thread(s)

    Bellingham bummer

    Bad news for NW wood riders, buncha trail ramps, etc getting torn down:

    http://www.komonews.com/news/local/S...?tab=video&c=y
    1980ish Free Spirit Sunbird fixed * 1996 Mongoose IBOC Zero-G * 1997 KHS Comp * 1990-ish Scapin * Lemond Buenos Aires Triple

  2. #2
    In search of moar cowbell dminor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The 509
    My Bikes
    1971 Suzuki TS125/ factory race kit/AHRMA-legal; 1969 Suzuki TS250/factory race kit; 1967 Suzuki K-15 Hillbilly Trail 80; 1977 Yamaha IT175; 1964 VanTech Scrambler racing frame
    Posts
    12,121
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Yeah, saw that over on RM along with this link:

    http://evergreenmtb.org/php/show_page.php?page_id=357

    Weird, DNR is pretty cool over here; I've worked side-by-side with a lot of their staff over the years during wildfire seasons. NW District must be staffed by a lot of hippie foresters, though.

    Some pics from the farewell ride:







    More here:
    http://www.pinkbike.com/news/north-f...ures-2012.html

  3. #3
    Pedals, Paddles and Poles Daspydyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Btw the Mohave desert and AREA 51
    My Bikes
    Scott Spark 20, Orbea Orca
    Posts
    5,159
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rules is rules, dang it. I was riding Monday night and someone had put a small jump on a multi use dirt trail. I says to mysef, cute, but someone is gonna be pissed. Hikers don't like us bikes already. What were they thinking.
    I think its disgusting and terrible how people treat Lance Armstrong, especially after winning 7 Tour de France Titles while on drugs!

    I can't even find my bike when I'm on drugs. -Willie N.

  4. #4
    Senior Member TacomaSailor's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tacoma WA & San Diego CA
    My Bikes
    Specialized Roubaix road bike, Stumpjumper Comp hardtail, Trance X2 FS mountainbike
    Posts
    249
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The reasons given by DNR seem to be successfully addressed by many other state and local agencies in Washington. For example:

    Duthie
    Banner Forrest
    Capitol Forest

    All those riding areas have lots of developed trails and the responsible agencies seem to be happy with their control of liabilities.

    It is too bad that we can log and destroy the forests but we can develop them for multi-use.

  5. #5
    In search of moar cowbell dminor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The 509
    My Bikes
    1971 Suzuki TS125/ factory race kit/AHRMA-legal; 1969 Suzuki TS250/factory race kit; 1967 Suzuki K-15 Hillbilly Trail 80; 1977 Yamaha IT175; 1964 VanTech Scrambler racing frame
    Posts
    12,121
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TacomaSailor View Post
    It is too bad that we can log and destroy the forests but we can develop them for multi-use.
    In fairness, the first and primary responsibility of the Dept. of Natural Resources is to manage the timberlands in their trust as working forests/timberlands - - mostly for the funding of K-12 education. If you look at a map of the state forest lands, you will see that a good majority of it is "Common School Trust" lands - - meaning that timber is raised, harvested and sold to support state funding of the public school system.

    The fact that the DNR most often allows for multiple-use on many of these lands, as long as it does not conflict with their primary objectives, is bonus to all of us. That these allowances seem to be inconsistent throughout the state is unfortunate and frustrating for sure. It's too bad there are land managers within the agency who seem to be advancing personal philosphies/agendas, to the detriment of all recreational users of state lands.

    The only agency I'm aware of that has ever been specifically charged with providing multiple-use recreational opportunities within working forest lands is the U.S. Forest Service. And you see the direction that's going too - - more and more of the people in charge seem to be environmental activists who are now trying to restrict recreation and expand wilderness designations within National Forest boundaries - - far from the original mission of the USFS. I blame this on my generation and all the ex-hippies who glommed onto the outdoor jobs in the federal and state governments after they settled down from their college-protest/Peace Corps and/or weed-smoking days. [/rant]
    Last edited by dminor; 04-05-12 at 02:43 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •