Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    145
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    What's a "cute" mountain bike?

    My girlfriend has enjoyed mountain biking the few times we've gone (she's always rented one) and she wants her own now. I'd like to get her something with disc brakes and (if possible) a suspension fork. She likes vintage-style bikes that look simple without all the graphics and aggressive lines you see on most mountain bikes today. She's 5'1" so I'm thinking a 26" or 650b would be easier for her to handle than a 29". She wasn't digging the Surly Troll I showed her and I've also been looking at the Civilian mtbs as well as Soma's line. Anybody know of other similarly-styled mountain bikes that I should take a look at? Around $1k would be best but I'm willing to build up a frameset too so anything goes! Thanks everyone.

  2. #2
    Senior Member catonec's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    burlington VT.
    Posts
    2,319
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I havent plugged them in a while but $1000 goes a long way at bikes direct. the motobecanes are not real flashy but a decent ride.
    2010 Kestrel RT900SL, 800k carbon, chorus/record, speedplay, zonda
    1997 Trek ZX6000, 6061w/manitou spyder, xt/xtr, time atac

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Sunny so. cal.
    My Bikes
    2013 Kona Hei Hei Supreme, 2001 LeMond Zurich, 1991 Fisher Paragon
    Posts
    368
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Try looking for a women's specific model like these below. They tend to have more fem/tamer colors and graphics. I think some actually alter the geom to fit women better too.

    http://www.trekbikes.com/us/en/colle...untain/models/

    http://www.specialized.com/us/en/bikes/mountain#womens

  4. #4
    Chainstay Brake Mafia
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    5,870
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by bikeme View Post
    Try looking for a women's specific model like these below.
    I looked at those and couldn't tell why there were "women specific".. is there anything besides marketing?
    1986 Diamondback Apex ~ 1988 Diamondback Ascent EX ~ 1989 Jamis Dakar ~ 1989 Specialized Stumpjumper Comp
    1993 Trek 8300 Composite ~ 1993 Diamondback Axis Team Titanium ~ 1995 Diamondback Apex

    Join the Chainstay Brake Mafia!

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Sunny so. cal.
    My Bikes
    2013 Kona Hei Hei Supreme, 2001 LeMond Zurich, 1991 Fisher Paragon
    Posts
    368
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by frantik View Post
    I looked at those and couldn't tell why there were "women specific".. is there anything besides marketing?
    I don't know what makes them women specific--I didn't have a personal need to look into it very far. You can compare angles and tube/stem lengths to "mens" models I guess. Maybe the frame sizes are smaller? Maybe they have women-specific seats only--I don't know. Maybe it's just marketing as you said. The OP was looking for tamer graphics only so they'd suffice in that regard.

  6. #6
    coprolite fietsbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    NW,Oregon Coast
    My Bikes
    7
    Posts
    3,394
    Mentioned
    50 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    WSD , like from Trek is a bit less reach for a given frame size[height] than a mens frame design of same 'size"

    as females are usually shorter arms and torso , longer legs..

    I looked at those and couldn't tell why there were "women specific"
    by "look" did that take place in person, and include test rides?

  7. #7
    Chainstay Brake Mafia
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    5,870
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i did look into it a lil.. it seemed specialized offers different seats, smaller frames and brake levers with smaller reach. still the only thing i could tell that was specific to women's anatomy was the seats though


    If she likes vintage looks, I'd suggest you go vintage.. though of course then you don't get suspension or disc brakes..
    1986 Diamondback Apex ~ 1988 Diamondback Ascent EX ~ 1989 Jamis Dakar ~ 1989 Specialized Stumpjumper Comp
    1993 Trek 8300 Composite ~ 1993 Diamondback Axis Team Titanium ~ 1995 Diamondback Apex

    Join the Chainstay Brake Mafia!

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    2,544
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    You could find an older(2000 or so), simpler looking MTB/frame with an 80mm fork. That should be cheap enough to get, and if you get something higher end, 9sp xt/xtr components are great stuff. Then just replace the fork with something more modern. That will give you a nice front disk option at least, and depending on the bike, something from that era might take disk brakes anyway. You could probably even through a 100mm fork on it and not mess with the geometry much.

    As for women specific frames, my g/f has one. The top tube is definitely shorter than a comparably sized men's model. She says it fits her better. To me it feels kind cramped. Makes sense that they'd have women specific frames for those who need them with shorter torso/arms/whatever. I say get your girlfriend on a couple and see if she likes the difference. The only problem is they're hard to find for test rides(at least in my area). My girlfriend's is a Novara Amiga frame with the original shorter cranks(165s), but everything else on the bike is changed/upgraded. For comparison, my girlfriend is 5'2".
    90 Miyata 914 with full Dura-Ace
    74 Ellis-Briggs, full butted 531
    80s Cierra Professional 5000, Tange Champion 2 and Shimano 600
    2011 New Belgium Cruiser
    Fetish Cycles "Discipline" built up with DJ2 fork and Shimano XTR, LX, Avid BB7.

    Quote Originally Posted by scyclops View Post
    Oh yeah, sure, what if everyone thought that way? Then internet forums would merely be places where rational people exchange useful information and ideas - instead of the chaotic, emotionally-charged circuses that they are.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •