Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    GT Avalance or SCOTT Aspen

    Hi there everyone,

    I want to get a bike for on-off road / cross country cycling and was suggested the GT Avalance or SCOTT Aspen.
    Has anyone tried either of them or would you suggest something else ?
    (The money to be invested are in the range 500-700 $).

    Thanks
    Costas

  2. #2
    Wood Licker Maelstrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Whistler,BC
    My Bikes
    Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002 and specialized BMX
    Posts
    16,888
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I moved it to the right area for you. You will get more answers here

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Cheers Maelstrom

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    212
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What Avalanche model are you talking about?
    "Hippies...hippies...they're everywhere...they want to save the earth but all they do is smoke pot and smell bad." - Cartman, Southpark

  5. #5
    Banned. Jason222's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Moncton NB
    My Bikes
    Trek Jack...trials bike soon.
    Posts
    2,123
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    aspen, because Gt bikes are...junkier... and Gt bikes have junkier components. Scott aspen all the way. Deore components.
    Last edited by Jason222; 02-05-05 at 10:34 AM.

  6. #6
    DJColorado
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Loveland, Colorado
    My Bikes
    Rockhopper Comp, GT Avalanche, Specialized Sequoia & Crossroads
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have an Avalanche that is probably seven years old and was build before GT went through all the ownership changes that hurt its rep. It has LX and XT components and for its time was a great bike. The newer hard tail frame designs like the Rockhopper I bought this year have a top tube that drops down at an angle to the seat tube instead of being parallel to the ground like the GT's. For the same frame size, the new designs seem much more manuverable. As much as I like the GT, time has passed it by independent of the component and quality issues people talk about today.

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sp@eder
    What Avalanche model are you talking about?

    Im talking about Avalance 2.0 (model 2005). What is your opinion about it ?
    Cheers.

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jason222
    aspen, because Gt bikes are...junkier... and Gt bikes have junkier components. Scott aspen all the way. Deore components.
    Isnt it though that GTs are robust ? I mean what ever components they come with they stand the test of time.

  9. #9
    DJColorado
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Loveland, Colorado
    My Bikes
    Rockhopper Comp, GT Avalanche, Specialized Sequoia & Crossroads
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The older GT that I have is an Avalanch, but I'm sure the origninal version and not the Avalanch 2.0. I did look at a 2.0 when I was deciding to get my next new bike, and I couldn't tell any difference in the frame design between my older one and the 2.0. It looked like the primary difference was in the components. Mine came with the best front shock Rockshok made at the time and LX components throughout except for the derailer which was XT. With the 2.0, I don't know anything about the shock they chose to put on it, but the rest of the components were not of the same quality. Regarding whether the current 2.0 components are "good enough", I think it depends on how much and how hard you ride as well as how well you maintain the bike. My wife is an occasional rider with a bike with Shimano Alivio components (a couple steps down from LX) and I have maintained it as often as my bike even though I ride a lot more. The components have held up very well for her.

  10. #10
    Factory Spec FS Tech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Ventura, Ca.
    Posts
    55
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For 2005 models, a side by side comparison component spec would say the Scott Aspen is a superior bike. That reflects in the price also, as it is 25-30% more than the GT.
    As far as ride quality, handling and frame strength, well, they are fairly similar in geometry, tubing material, etc. So, I would anticipate the frames themselves being essentially equal.
    The fork on the Scott is marginally better than the GT (Manitou vs. SR).
    Probably the most important issue is Scott is a company that is coming on strong, while GT is (sadly) slipping into mediocrity. If you should have a frame warranty issue, Scott would likely be a faster and less complex responder.
    Ed

  11. #11
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks a lot djcolorado and FS Tech u ve been really detalied and helpfull with your posts.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    87
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just bought the Gt Avalance 2.0 and I love it. It's a great bike. I was comparing to the Trek 4500 and the Specialized Rockhopper. I like all 3 bikes. I cam home with the GT.

    Years ago when I used to ride, I owned 3 different GT bikes all BMX.

    Forced

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •