standard or compact drive
05-08-02, 04:00 AM
#1
Im not wearing any pants!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lake District, UK
Posts: 93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
standard or compact drive
what do you reckon is better, compact or standard drive? or does it depend on what i want to use it for? If i get compact cranks, compact chainrings, what kind of cassette do i need, can i just use an ordinary one, such as the shimano XT 9 speed cassette, or do i need to find a special compact cassette to go alongside the rings and crank?
05-08-02, 09:09 AM
#2
Donating member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Faversham, Kent, UK
Posts: 1,852
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I went for standard, because I largely ride on road. I can't think that the rear cassette matters too much other than giving you the ratios you want, but there are more knowlegeable people on this site than me 
Richard
Richard
__________________
Currently riding an MTB with a split personality - commuting, touring, riding for the sake of riding, on or off road :)
Currently riding an MTB with a split personality - commuting, touring, riding for the sake of riding, on or off road :)
05-08-02, 09:56 AM
#3
Im not wearing any pants!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lake District, UK
Posts: 93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i think one gives you more lower gears and the other more higher gears but im not sure. Also i get low/ high gears confused, i can never remember whether low is easier or harder to pedal.
05-08-02, 03:01 PM
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Posts: 12,948
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Micro-drives were invented by Suntour to give the same ratio as standard (older) MTB cranks, but using less metal.
The smaller rings are used with smaller cogs to give a transmission system which is lighter and has greater ground clearance.
The dissadvatange is increased friction and rate of wear , increased stress on the teeth, leading to chipping.
Microdrives often use a 9 tooth cog, but professional cog engineers I have spoken to (on bike rides) consider 10 the safe minimum.
You should choose yourt gear ratios according to your own needs (strenth/terrain etc). Measure them in gear inches for comparison:
(no of chainring teeth/no of cog teeth) X wheel diameter (in inches ie 26)
The smaller rings are used with smaller cogs to give a transmission system which is lighter and has greater ground clearance.
The dissadvatange is increased friction and rate of wear , increased stress on the teeth, leading to chipping.
Microdrives often use a 9 tooth cog, but professional cog engineers I have spoken to (on bike rides) consider 10 the safe minimum.
You should choose yourt gear ratios according to your own needs (strenth/terrain etc). Measure them in gear inches for comparison:
(no of chainring teeth/no of cog teeth) X wheel diameter (in inches ie 26)
05-08-02, 03:27 PM
#7
Im not wearing any pants!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lake District, UK
Posts: 93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
so for XC what do you reckon would be more suitable, im kinda leaning towards compact, but i dont want to find out that standard is better for XC than compact. Or is it just more down to personal taste rather than say standard for road, compact for XC.
05-08-02, 03:56 PM
#8
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,796
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1392 Post(s)
Liked 1,324 Times
in
836 Posts
I strongly favor 110-74mm BCD drive over compact, because of the chain, cog, and ring wear issues mentioned earlier. Over the years, a compact drive will cost significantly more to operate. For those who care about how their gear ratios interleave from chainring to chainring, the larger cogs and rings provide better arithmetic selection than the smaller ones.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
