Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Mountain Biking (https://www.bikeforums.net/mountain-biking/)
-   -   new bike!!! (https://www.bikeforums.net/mountain-biking/87922-new-bike.html)

madbiker555 02-12-05 06:45 PM

2 Attachment(s)
I'm looking into getting A Norco VPS B-Line or a Norco Manik. Im getting into more downhill riding and north shore style. The manik has a 170mm travel fork (which would help absorb the stuff that I run over :)), but the b-line has a back shock rather than a hardtail like the Manik has. The prices are the same except the b-line is $9 more (big price difference huh?). I'm not good at making decisions so could someone help?

mindbogger 02-12-05 07:14 PM

Can't really decide for you, but I can give you some advice.

If you personally have never ridden a bike, go with the hardtail and gain some more skill before moving on to a full suspension. A full suspension will only hinder your progress unless you have some background knowledge and skill.

I would personally go with the Manik. It has a better build and should be more benefical.

my 2 cents. Feel free to disagree.

PWRDbyTRD 02-12-05 07:29 PM

what are the levels of components on both bikes? is the FS bike a bottom end FS bike?

madbiker555 02-12-05 07:47 PM


Originally Posted by mindbogger
Can't really decide for you, but I can give you some advice.

If you personally have never ridden a bike, go with the hardtail and gain some more skill before moving on to a full suspension. A full suspension will only hinder your progress unless you have some background knowledge and skill.

I would personally go with the Manik. It has a better build and should be more benefical.

my 2 cents. Feel free to disagree.

I usually do dirtjumping and urban but I'm really getting into the whole downhill scene now but then agian I love the whole north shore thing. I have alot of experience in dirtjumping/urban so I think i might go with the manik. I can get the manik at my lbs but the b-line i'd have travel some distance to get to the shop that has it.

madbiker555 02-12-05 07:49 PM


Originally Posted by PWRDbyTRD
what are the levels of components on both bikes? is the FS bike a bottom end FS bike?

The FS is Norco's bottom end downhill/full mountain bike, but I've heard its pretty good for the price even if it is entry level.

PWRDbyTRD 02-12-05 08:03 PM


Originally Posted by madbiker555
The FS is Norco's bottom end downhill/full mountain bike, but I've heard its pretty good for the price even if it is entry level.

just realize you get more bang for the buck on a hardtail.

Jason222 02-12-05 08:29 PM

Manik. Better "stuff".

DjRider04 02-12-05 08:33 PM

Id go for the Manik and just save up for a FS frame afterwards.

madbiker555 02-12-05 09:30 PM

Thanks for the help, Im leaning more towards the manik but I think I'd still like to test ride the b-line.

Killer B 02-12-05 09:35 PM

Buy both :)

On l@@ks alone, I'd choose the B-Line....

snoopz666 02-12-05 09:36 PM

ya get the manik, and then save up and get an A-line or similar bike

anthonaut 02-13-05 01:03 AM

Just wait and save up for an A line.

Or I'd just pick the Manik. A high end hardtail beats a low end FS IMO, but the Manik wouldnt be a great jump bike.

cryogenic 02-13-05 05:13 AM

Manik all the way... Given an equivalently priced HT & FS, the HT is going to have better components on it. You're paying extra for the rear suspension. Plus, the Manik just plain looks better.

Drunken Chicken 02-13-05 06:34 AM

Get the Manik.

norcodirtjumper 02-13-05 12:55 PM

As many people have said the B-line is a low end downhill bike. The Manik on the other hand is a pretty high end bike. Id go with the Manik because it has better parts, but both are strong bikes.

Norco's Awsome!

madbiker555 02-14-05 06:00 PM

Im going with the manik, mostly because it's a Norco and I like those big nasty 170mm shocks on the front :D. Now I'll just have to see how many are left at my lbs, last time I checked there were 7 but around this time they run out of stock, fast.

snoopz666 02-14-05 11:23 PM

you say it "the big nasty 170mm fork" not shock, shock is on the back

PWRDbyTRD 02-14-05 11:33 PM


Originally Posted by snoopz666
you say it "the big nasty 170mm fork" not shock, shock is on the back

to each their own.

anthonaut 02-15-05 12:27 AM

Yeah, just ask any MXer.

madbiker555 02-17-05 07:20 PM

sorry my bad... I was up late I meant fork not shocks.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:41 PM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.