New 2x10 set up
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times
in
226 Posts
New 2x10 set up
I was reading the new dirtrag and saw that almost every bike was a single up front times 10 in back?
What memo did I miss and why is this the rage?
I have an old school 3x9.......so help a brotha out.
The idea of a single front chainring is cools I guess but whats the magic tooth number needed?
I would like some insight as to when this too place.....
What memo did I miss and why is this the rage?
I have an old school 3x9.......so help a brotha out.
The idea of a single front chainring is cools I guess but whats the magic tooth number needed?
I would like some insight as to when this too place.....
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 153
Bikes: 1994 Giant Yukon (first mountain bike), 2003 Trek Fuel, Custom Full Carbon hardtail MB (in progress), Scattante with Dura Ace (custom build up)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I believe most 2x10 setups have a 39t outer chainring. I imagine if you did a 1x10 setup with a 32t front chainring, and a standard MTB 10 speed cassete you would a good gear range. The magic tooth number is whatever you will be comfortable with on steep climbs and adrenaline inducing downies!
#3
Pedals, Paddles and Poles
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vegas Valley, NV
Posts: 5,495
Bikes: Santa Cruz Tallboy, Ridley Noah, Scott Spark 20
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1233 Post(s)
Liked 69 Times
in
58 Posts
The terrain and the strength of the rider is what determines what you really need for rings. I still like the variety my 3X9 offers. A 2X9 can give you a wide spread and can probably stretch as far as a 3X9. A tad less weight and less shifting would be my guess for the 2X9. Since I ride pavement to get to my trails, I like the 3X9 setup. A 1X9 can save you TAD X's 2 if you get the range that you like.
__________________
I think its disgusting and terrible how people treat Lance Armstrong, especially after winning 7 Tour de France Titles while on drugs!
I can't even find my bike when I'm on drugs. -Willie N.
I think its disgusting and terrible how people treat Lance Armstrong, especially after winning 7 Tour de France Titles while on drugs!
I can't even find my bike when I'm on drugs. -Willie N.
#5
Ride On.
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 315
Bikes: 2010 Trek 1.5, 2010 Specialized Langster, 2010 Specialized Hardrock Sport 29er, 2011 Gary Fisher HiFi Plus 29er
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm debating on swapping my HiFi to a 2x10 setup. Possibly a 38/24.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 229
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I ride 32t up front with 11-34 9spd cassette but it's a 29er with tall tires. Just keep an eye on the highest and lowest gear you use regularly on your current setup, then muck about in a gear calculator to find the best matching setup for that range.
#7
Two-Wheeled Aficionado
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita
Posts: 4,903
Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur TR, Cannondale Quick CX dropbar conversion & others
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
I have a 26" bike with 2x10- 28/39 rings and 11-36 cassette. In Kansas, I can actually ride most trails entirely in the big ring. But I would hate a 32T single because I run out of gear pretty quickly on any sustained downhill section, which is especially annoying if you're out with buddies on a gravel road ride. (I can bring my CX bike instead, but it beats me up on washboard roads.) 28x36 is more than adequate even on the steepest stuff I can do-- I'm no trials rider, so it's better for me to walk when it gets ultra slow and techy.
If you have a 29er I would suggest using no bigger than 38T. I would also caution you to be sure your rear derailleur has enough capacity to use a 11-36 or 12-36 cassette with the 2x10 crankset you choose. That's how I ended up with a 28T small ring-- my SRAM x9 type 2 midcage can't handle the 11-36 cassette otherwise.
If you have a 29er I would suggest using no bigger than 38T. I would also caution you to be sure your rear derailleur has enough capacity to use a 11-36 or 12-36 cassette with the 2x10 crankset you choose. That's how I ended up with a 28T small ring-- my SRAM x9 type 2 midcage can't handle the 11-36 cassette otherwise.
#8
Official Website Waterboy
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,271
Bikes: a lot
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I dropped the 39 tooth off the cranks and just run the 26 tooth in a 1X10. ditching the fr derailuer, shifter,cable and housing lost almost a pound off the bike. plenty of gearing for my trails. gravel rides leave me spinning my ass off though.
#9
Two-Wheeled Aficionado
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita
Posts: 4,903
Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur TR, Cannondale Quick CX dropbar conversion & others
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
My bike weighs 24.5 pounds ready to ride. So, I'm pretty happy about being able to pedal faster than 13 mph.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jambon
Bicycle Mechanics
11
08-01-16 11:48 PM