Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Help Give Me Some Advice A Hardrock Sport Disk Or A Giant Boulder?

    hi well i was a big bmx er but i wanted to try mountain biking cause it looked so much funner well what bike should i get a specialized hardrock sport disc or a 2005 giant boulder?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Chicago
    My Bikes
    2002 Bianchi Veloce 2005 Gary Fisher Marlin
    Posts
    516
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I recomend you take a trip over to MountainBikeReview.com http://www.mtbr.com
    They will have consumer reviews of both of the bikes you are looking at and should have some info on how they differ. I know specialized markets the hardrock as a mountain/around town bike. If your willing to spend around 400 for the hardrock I'd suggest you look at a rockehopper instead, You should be able to find an older model 04 or 03 for around 400 as well.
    After a trip to MTBR.com take both of the bikes for a ride, each one will have its own geometries, and one may fit you better. I also suspect the Giant is going to be a whole lot heavier, its made out of steel, but doesn't appear to be a lighter steel alloy, I suspect it is made out of the same steel you find in a bike from K-mart, which no one here would recomend.
    Hopefully this will help you in your decision.

    P.S. If you want a straight no-frills answer to which bike to get I would say spend the extra cash and get the hardrock.

  3. #3
    NCAA - DUAL CHAMPIONS! a2psyklnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    From Sarasota, FL sitting in front of a computer spewing random thoughts!
    My Bikes
    Intense Uzzi SL, Masi Speciale, Trek 3700 Nashbar Single Speed, Old Cilo Road frame
    Posts
    7,965
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Both decent enough bikes. Test ride each of them and buy the one that fits the best.

    Also, check out the $500 Mountain Bike Thread:The "around" $500 MTB thread.

    Good luck from another old BMXer.
    "Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "WOW, What a Ride!" - unknown
    "Your Bike Sucks" - Sky Yaeger

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,398
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by brett_gt
    hi well i was a big bmx er but i wanted to try mountain biking cause it looked so much funner well what bike should i get a specialized hardrock sport disc or a 2005 giant boulder?
    Well, you're talking about two bikes in two different price ranges. $230 (Giant) vs $440 (Specialized) MSRP.

    In that price range, your talking about the Yukon in the Giant line. And I know this decision personally, since these were my final choices last spring.

    IF, you are looking into free-riding hucking, etc... (BMX style mountain biking) I would suggest the Hardrock. That frame is built to take drops. And it is VERY heavy. It also has a lower top tube near the saddle which is important for huckers.

    If you want to do pure cross-country riding, the Yukon is lighter and has a speedier frame geometry. Though the Yukon DOES splurge on a Deore Derailleur (teamed with lousy Alivio Shifters).

    Both bikes come with bottom of the barrel disc brakes. Though bottom of the barrel discs are still 3 times as nice as super-duper rim brakes.

    Both bikes come with lower end drivetrains and shifters.

    Both come with the same low end Trutativ crankset (feel lucky mine came with a crappy no name crank that was replaced almost IMMEDIATELY!!!!)

    Overall, BOTH of these bikes is a strong contender for the entry level MTB category. If you're a lightweight rider, you should get a season out of either before having to replace components.

    Remember that one buys a bike for the frame. Pretty much ANYONE will end up replacing components with something they like better. And if you're going to throw something away, best it be something cheap. You WILL end up replacing the drivetrains on either of these bikes (to SRAM ESP 1:1 if you're smart).

    It comes down to the frame. If you're a hucker, the hardrock frame is an excellent (though heavy) workhorse). If your in it for cross-country, the Giant Aluxx-Butted Fluid Form frame is and excellent (and VERY strong) performer.

    Oh yeah, there is one more thing ... COLOR. Last years Yukon came in a cool (masculine) Black and Blue.



    This years Yukon has gotten a little in touch with it's feminine side coming in a slate blue that could remotely pass for a pastel.



    The Hardrock sport is ALL MAN, coming in a green flame job worthy of Jesse Jame's. The hard flame job in green/black or silver/black screams badass. It also comes in a boring but solid blue.




    OK, one more bit of advice. It you want to "cut to the chase" and buy a bike close to something respectable. Giant is now offering SRAM on their higher end Rainier model. X.7 Shifters and derailleur. That's all you need for precise "set it and forget it" shifting. Plus Hayes So1e hydros. Plus a MARZOCHI fork as opposed to cheapo Suntour or RST offerings. Color is a bright but respectable blue/white.

    http://www.giantbicycle.com/us/030.0...sp?model=11037


    I went for the Giant. In restrospect, I should have bought the Rainier. Because I've spent well above what a Rainier WOULD have cost in order to replace cheapo parts that couldn't stand up to a 270 lb rider. Oh yeah, and those Alivio shifters SUCK, SUCK, SUCK!!!!


    So if you HAVE the $$$, do yourself a favor and spend it upfront.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •