Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Westchester, NY
    Posts
    115
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    2013 Trek Fuel EX 8 26er?

    Hi, went to my LBS again. This time they had a 2013 Trek Fuel Ex 8 26er on sale. MSRP is $2849 and they have it on sale for $2350. I see that Trek has a $340 rebate on this bike. Never really considered this bike because of it's original price. I was actually looking at only 29er FS bikes, but came across this one. Incredible components for the money and it rides, handles and breaks extremely well. I was about to purchase a leftover 2012 Giant Anthem X 29er 2 for around$1700, but this bike has me re thinking. I don't really have any plans on doing any XC racing. Just intermediate single and technical trails with moderate climbing and descending. Anyone's opinions would be appreciated.




    http://www.trekbikes.com/us/en/bikes...ex/fuel_ex_8/#
    Last edited by Trek13; 06-21-13 at 05:00 PM. Reason: typo
    2013 20" Trek 7.3 FX

  2. #2
    Bad Company dminor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    The 509
    My Bikes
    are awesome.
    Posts
    12,226
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Looks like the whole package. I personally would likely go for it - - but then I just got a 'throwback' 26er recently myself. It looks set up for a similar style of rider that my SB66 is, albeit a degree steeper head angle. Still, a great bike.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
    Posts
    3,629
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Looks like a real nice bike, you can use the rebate get a dropper post to make it even better

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Westchester, NY
    Posts
    115
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks guys, I'm really torn between this 26" FS and 29er FS. Any 29er FS with similar components is going to be more expensive. No rebates on 2013 models yet (ex. Trek Fuel 29er). I did find a new 2012 29er Giant Anthem X 2 at a great price, but its more of an XC bike.
    2013 20" Trek 7.3 FX

  5. #5
    Two-Wheeled Aficionado ColinL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Wichita
    My Bikes
    Santa Cruz Blur, CX bike, roadie, & others
    Posts
    4,492
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Un-tear yourself. Here are some good reasons to buy the bike that is "only" a 26er.

    It's lighter. Simple math- frames and forks are smaller due to wheel diameter, and wheels and tires are lighter.

    It's more maneuverable, for the same reasons as above-- weight and tire diameter.

    Still more trail tire availability for 26" than 29". (I am excluding cyclocross tires, talking only 1.8" or larger knobbies.) In a few years, sadly, this may not be true. But today it is.

    It's fast enough. Yes, every XC racer and their dog has moved to 29er due to perceived or actual rolling resistance advantages. You don't need to worry about that in the slightest. The bike will still go as fast as you can pedal it, or have skill to ride it downhill. Period.

    Full disclosure: I have a pretty good 26" FS bike and keep riding 29ers, but have yet to find a reason to 'upgrade'.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Westchester, NY
    Posts
    115
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks guys, I know I'm all over the place trying to decide on the right bike. I've always had trouble committing. Just ask my wife. I know that I want a FS for sure now. I really do like that leftover 2012 Giant Anthem 29er x2, but the brakes (Elikar Avid 1) have little bite. My LBS said they spoke to the head mechanic and he said that are fine. Funny thing is I test rode a Trek Xcaliber with the same brakes and they were much better. I think they need to be bleed but LBS won't do it unless I commit. I also asked for a price quote for some SLX brakes or mid range Shimanos 5 series to replace the Elixars..
    2013 20" Trek 7.3 FX

  7. #7
    Senior Member ncfisherman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Chapel Hill
    My Bikes
    Canfield Yelli Screamy, Pivot Mach5, Specialized Roubaix, '65 Hercules, '79 Schwinn Stingray Lil Chic, '68 Schwinn Stingray Fastback, '89 Specialized Allez Epic, '86 Battaglin World Champion
    Posts
    457
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When it comes down to it, it's the rider not the bike(or wheelsize). Fast riders are fast on any bike.

    I've a owned a few FS 29er's(and ridden others) and these days I'm back on a 140mm travel FS 26. For me, it's purely based on level of enjoyment. It's easier for me to maneuver 26" wheels, where the FS 29ers had a long wheelbase and always felt stuck to the ground. I also split ride time on a 29er HT, which with it's short wheelbase and slack angles, gives me a that similar feel that I like on the FS 26.

    I wouldn't really take the brakes into account. Avids work fine and it sounds like it could be a setup issue -- maybe the pads are glazed over, which would lead to less friction/stopping power.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    329
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Last time I test rode a Trek 6 or 7 it rode like a lounge chair with bars. Funky. Felt raked out and steered slow, but it's been a while.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Westchester, NY
    Posts
    115
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by License2Ill View Post
    Last time I test rode a Trek 6 or 7 it rode like a lounge chair with bars. Funky. Felt raked out and steered slow, but it's been a while.
    Yeah, I'm thinking the Fuels have come a long way in the last few days. They've even won trail bike of the year, twice I believe.
    2013 20" Trek 7.3 FX

  10. #10
    Senior Member Dilberto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    886
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Stay on original plan....go 29er. I almost pulled the trigger on a blowout, demo 2013 Fuel 9.9 SSL, for $3400. But once I rode the 29er again(2012 Trek Superfly 100 Pro) - my objectives were reconfirmed...the 24-pound 29er is superior in my book.
    2001 Cannondale Bad Boy Ultra - 19.8lbs/8.98kg
    2012 Trek Superfly 100 Pro - 23.6lbs/10.70kg

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Westchester, NY
    Posts
    115
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dilberto View Post
    Stay on original plan....go 29er. I almost pulled the trigger on a blowout, demo 2013 Fuel 9.9 SSL, for $3400. But once I rode the 29er again(2012 Trek Superfly 100 Pro) - my objectives were reconfirmed...the 24-pound 29er is superior in my book.
    Exactly what I plan on doing, thanks. I'm going to be renting a 2012 Specialized Stumpjumper FSR Comp for a week before I decide which 29er to buy. I'm a newbie and I want to test the local trails and this sport before I commit. It's a 26er but the only FS bike they have for rent. I may go the Specialized route since this dealer also sells them.
    2013 20" Trek 7.3 FX

  12. #12
    Two-Wheeled Aficionado ColinL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Wichita
    My Bikes
    Santa Cruz Blur, CX bike, roadie, & others
    Posts
    4,492
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Both of my BILs rented Fuel Ex 5s at Copper Mountain and they liked them. The EX 8 has the same frame with better components.

    here's a differing opinion on the Superfly 100 carbon, which incidentally I do not think is in your price range or a good choice for an all-arounder.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •