Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-26-13, 09:51 AM   #26
Pamestique 
Shredding Grandma!
 
Pamestique's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: So Cal
Bikes: I don't own any bikes
Posts: 4,795
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
I don't want to get into a 29 v 26 debate - where I live, just about everyone is buying into the 29 craze and I can see from manufacturers that is the trend but... again I am not an expert or know all that much about bikes... but have been riding a long time and well, just don't get the whole 29er thing (and yes I have tried them out).

I understand the wheels roll over obstacles better... well if obstacles are a problem, why not road ride instead? I thought the whole point of mountain biking was learning the skills of negotiating over roots, rocks, through sand, switchbacks etc all things roadies don't encounter (I am old school that way). Now I see new riders buying 29ers and expecting them to do everything the 26er does - it can't and won't ever. These guys are just tearing up an d destroying old established trails trying though... they never learn skills and they never learn patience - its all about "how fast can I go without anything getting in my way"... is that about it?

BTW I recently sold my Stumpjumper hardtail - a 26er - with all the custom upgrades and wheels it weighed in around 24 lbs. and it was fast! I would bet a skilled rider on that bike would beat a skilled rider on a 29er any day of the week!

AND maybe I don't understand the OP but I thought he said he paid $1900 for the bike - it should weigh less than 34 lbs at that price...
__________________
______________________________________________________________

Private docent led mountain bike rides through Limestone Canyon. Go to letsgooutside.org and register today! Also available: hikes, equestrian rides and family events as well as trail maintenance and science study.

Last edited by Pamestique; 06-26-13 at 09:55 AM.
Pamestique is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-13, 10:34 AM   #27
Papa Wheelie
Senior Member
 
Papa Wheelie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Boise, ID
Bikes: Specialized Stumpjumper EVO R; Salsa Spearfish 2; Cannondale Six13
Posts: 239
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think that is boils down to what one person wants, vs what another person expects, vs what somebody else will accept. You really CANNOT compare any of the situations. Suspension forks made our rigid bikes more comfortable, which REALLY made them faster, for longer periods of time. Are you riding a rigid bike, or did you buy into the whole "suspension fork" trend? When do "trends" stop, and it is actually progression? The point that YOU stopped accepting product progression, is that were everybody else should have also stopped? I like to ride a road bike, but that is a totally different challenge than mountain biking. I like to roll over any and all obstacles that I can, when mountain biking, but I want my risks cut to a minimum. I find that my larger wheeled 29'er makes the risks far less. If I wanted to simply hone my skills to their highest potential, I would go rigid, and try to shred the gnar. I am going to end up in the hospital though, so what is the point in that? Progression is about making the bike work better, allowing me to go faster, for longer durations of time, over more challenging terrain. You can dismiss what every engineer is trying to do (make bikes work better) as some marketing "trend" all you want.

Last edited by Papa Wheelie; 06-26-13 at 10:39 AM.
Papa Wheelie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-13, 11:50 AM   #28
slowride454
Senior Member
 
slowride454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Appleton WI
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix - Soma Double Cross Disc - Salsa Spearfish - Canfield Brothers Yelli Screamy - Specialized Carve SL - Trek Farley 7 - GT Dyno VFR
Posts: 511
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
last week I rode a tight single track course and was humbled to say the least on my 29er. There was one tight RH switchback I could not navigate at all. I had to almost stop. A friend was riding his backup bike, a very old 26" single speed no suspension classic. He let me borrow it. WOW! I am not a good rider, I am old, fat, uncoordinated, and lack bravery. That bike made me feel like a little kid again on my 20" BMX bikes. The single speed made my knees feel like I was 80 going up hills though. It sure got me thinking. How much fun would a carbon 26" with a 1X11 with an aggressive geometry be in the tight stuff?
slowride454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-13, 12:26 PM   #29
paradigm shifte
Banned.
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pamestique View Post
a 26er - with all the custom upgrades and wheels it weighed in around 24 lbs. and it was fast! I would bet a skilled rider on that bike would beat a skilled rider on a 29er any day of the week!
Why?
paradigm shifte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-13, 01:17 PM   #30
Papa Wheelie
Senior Member
 
Papa Wheelie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Boise, ID
Bikes: Specialized Stumpjumper EVO R; Salsa Spearfish 2; Cannondale Six13
Posts: 239
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
One of the guys in my normal riding group rides a Gary Fisher 26" full suspender. He said that he likes to ride it because "it is more fun to jump stuff, on the downhills." One day I was following him along, and he was shredding the gnar! He must have been getting 5" off the ground, and jumping maybe 1 or 2 feet down the trail! Once I saw that, I had no more questions.......
Papa Wheelie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-13, 01:25 PM   #31
ColinL
Two-Wheeled Aficionado
 
ColinL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Wichita
Bikes: Santa Cruz Blur TR, Cannondale Quick CX dropbar conversion & others
Posts: 4,905
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
LOL @ sarcastic post.

My 26" FS is a size XL and it weighs 24.5 pounds. It has 'only' 115mm rear travel, but I'm taking it to Colorado for a week to ride in the Breckenridge / Keystone area. (It's a family vacation and that's the destination for all manner of hiking, biking & kayaking. I know there is way radder stuff to ride elsewhere in CO.)
ColinL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-13, 02:46 PM   #32
Papa Wheelie
Senior Member
 
Papa Wheelie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Boise, ID
Bikes: Specialized Stumpjumper EVO R; Salsa Spearfish 2; Cannondale Six13
Posts: 239
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It all boils down to what you think you need, and what you can actually get by with. I picked this beast up a week ago. I have taken it on four lunch time rides with my buddies. Each ride is about 15 miles long, of single-track, with about 1,000 to 1,500 feet of elevation gain. You know what? The bike did JUST FINE.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Trek730.jpg (101.6 KB, 18 views)
Papa Wheelie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-13, 09:23 AM   #33
zenout
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pamestique View Post
I don't want to get into a 29 v 26 debate - where I live, just about everyone is buying into the 29 craze and I can see from manufacturers that is the trend but... again I am not an expert or know all that much about bikes... but have been riding a long time and well, just don't get the whole 29er thing (and yes I have tried them out).

I understand the wheels roll over obstacles better... well if obstacles are a problem, why not road ride instead? I thought the whole point of mountain biking was learning the skills of negotiating over roots, rocks, through sand, switchbacks etc all things roadies don't encounter (I am old school that way). Now I see new riders buying 29ers and expecting them to do everything the 26er does - it can't and won't ever. These guys are just tearing up an d destroying old established trails trying though... they never learn skills and they never learn patience - its all about "how fast can I go without anything getting in my way"... is that about it?

BTW I recently sold my Stumpjumper hardtail - a 26er - with all the custom upgrades and wheels it weighed in around 24 lbs. and it was fast! I would bet a skilled rider on that bike would beat a skilled rider on a 29er any day of the week!

AND maybe I don't understand the OP but I thought he said he paid $1900 for the bike - it should weigh less than 34 lbs at that price...
1900.00 is very low price for a new full suspension....I cant control the weight,i didnt create the bike.When you dont spend much,your gonna sacrifice something.
zenout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-13, 08:16 PM   #34
License2Ill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 329
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
34lbs? Time to remove the reflectors. Maybe shave the grips.
License2Ill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-13, 06:14 AM   #35
Pamestique 
Shredding Grandma!
 
Pamestique's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: So Cal
Bikes: I don't own any bikes
Posts: 4,795
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by zenout View Post
1900.00 is very low price for a new full suspension....I cant control the weight,i didnt create the bike.When you dont spend much,your gonna sacrifice something.
My Juliana I purchased last year was around that (I think $1875) and even before upgrade it weighed much less; around 28 lbs. It was a good fully even before I upgraded (but I could not help myself) Of course it is a 26er so doesn't have the heavier weight of 29 wheels.
__________________
______________________________________________________________

Private docent led mountain bike rides through Limestone Canyon. Go to letsgooutside.org and register today! Also available: hikes, equestrian rides and family events as well as trail maintenance and science study.
Pamestique is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-13, 11:25 AM   #36
samburger
Redheaded Stepchild
 
samburger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: GA, USA
Bikes: A fat tire & a skinny tire & two others I loaned out
Posts: 1,912
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My FS 26" came out at 32.x# weighed standing up on a regular bathroom scale. Numbers may have been slightly off since I was holding it up. And FWIW I've put somewhere around $1700 or so in it building it up from sale/closeout/lightly-used parts. I haven't weighed it since I first finished the build & I've swapped out the shock & a few other small parts since then. Its current weight is approximately 'light enough to put on the roof rack after a long ride' pounds.

Last edited by samburger; 06-29-13 at 11:28 AM.
samburger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-13, 01:26 PM   #37
Pendergast
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 843
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
I checked a few reviews and listed bike weights for FS 29ers in that price range, and around 30 lbs.(assuming the weights listed are without pedals) seems pretty common. A few are a pound or two lighter. Jamis gives the weight of their XCR 29 Sport as 32.25 lbs. Add pedals to that and it's getting close to what you say your bike weighs. So yeah, your Camber may be on the heftier end of the scale in that price range, but I wouldn't worry about it.
Pendergast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-13, 05:58 PM   #38
License2Ill
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 329
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Yeah, I don't want to get in a debate, but uh....I'm slow as **** either way. It's good to know my old pos fsr xc is a lightweight by today's standards though. I feel faster now.
License2Ill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-13, 05:48 AM   #39
Duke of Kent
Senior Member
 
Duke of Kent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Bikes: Yeti ASRc, Focus Raven 29er, Flyxii FR316
Posts: 4,833
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
My HT 29er, running race wheels, 100mm RS SID RCT3, and 36t x 11-36t is just over 18lbs.

My 26er FS AM bike moves between just above 24lbs and just below 26lbs, depending on tires. Santa Cruz Blur LTC. 150mm front, 140mm rear.
Duke of Kent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-13, 09:58 PM   #40
formicaman
Senior Member
 
formicaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Bikes:
Posts: 332
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Correct me if I'm wrong(and I usually am), but as far as I know weight really only matters when it's rolling weight, aka wheels. Beyond that, extra pounds don't make any more difference on the bike than on your person, so a lock, water, or a beer belly all make the same difference -not much. Am I right here?
formicaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-13, 05:30 PM   #41
zenout
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by formicaman View Post
Correct me if I'm wrong(and I usually am), but as far as I know weight really only matters when it's rolling weight, aka wheels. Beyond that, extra pounds don't make any more difference on the bike than on your person, so a lock, water, or a beer belly all make the same difference -not much. Am I right here?
You are right.
zenout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-13, 06:26 PM   #42
patrickgm60
Senior Member
 
patrickgm60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Northern CA
Bikes:
Posts: 495
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by formicaman View Post
Correct me if I'm wrong(and I usually am), but as far as I know weight really only matters when it's rolling weight, aka wheels. Beyond that, extra pounds don't make any more difference on the bike than on your person, so a lock, water, or a beer belly all make the same difference -not much. Am I right here?
Weight matters most on climbs. The steeper the climb, the more advantage a lighter bike/wheels/belly provides. The rolling weight distinction is minor, from what I recall.
patrickgm60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-13, 09:25 AM   #43
formicaman
Senior Member
 
formicaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Bikes:
Posts: 332
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by patrickgm60 View Post
Weight matters most on climbs. The steeper the climb, the more advantage a lighter bike/wheels/belly provides. The rolling weight distinction is minor, from what I recall.
I could stand to lose at least 15 pounds, so I'm not gonna worry that my bike is 29.
formicaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-13, 09:50 AM   #44
Elduderino2412
Tour De French Fries
 
Elduderino2412's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Bikes: 2010 Cervelo R3 SL & 2013 Airborne Goblin
Posts: 1,250
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
2013 Camber Comp should only weigh about 29 lbs on the showroom floor
Elduderino2412 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-13, 11:20 AM   #45
zenout
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Bikes:
Posts: 200
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elduderino2412 View Post
2013 Camber Comp should only weigh about 29 lbs on the showroom floor
Its not a comp,its just a camber.Comp is 600.00 more.
zenout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-13, 11:40 AM   #46
Pamestique 
Shredding Grandma!
 
Pamestique's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: So Cal
Bikes: I don't own any bikes
Posts: 4,795
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by formicaman View Post
I could stand to lose at least 15 pounds, so I'm not gonna worry that my bike is 29.
Best advice... I tell people why worry about spending all that money to save 2 lbs of weight on a bike... just stop eating junk food and lose a few pounds - cheaper and healthier!
__________________
______________________________________________________________

Private docent led mountain bike rides through Limestone Canyon. Go to letsgooutside.org and register today! Also available: hikes, equestrian rides and family events as well as trail maintenance and science study.
Pamestique is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-13, 12:27 PM   #47
Elduderino2412
Tour De French Fries
 
Elduderino2412's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Bikes: 2010 Cervelo R3 SL & 2013 Airborne Goblin
Posts: 1,250
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by zenout View Post
Its not a comp,its just a camber.Comp is 600.00 more.
I think those only weigh about 31 lbs. Guessing you weighed it w/pedals and other stuff on their. That isn't all that bad, and average for a intro full suspension 29er
Elduderino2412 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-13, 11:02 PM   #48
Zephyr11
Pint-Sized Gnar Shredder
 
Zephyr11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere between heaven and hell
Bikes: '09 Jamis Komodo, '09 Mirraco Blend One, '08 Cervelo P2C, '08 Specialized Ruby Elite, '07 Yeti AS-R SL, '07 DMR Drone
Posts: 3,549
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elduderino2412 View Post
I think those only weigh about 31 lbs. Guessing you weighed it w/pedals and other stuff on their. That isn't all that bad, and average for a intro full suspension 29er
Or he has a bigger size bike than the one you weighed.
Zephyr11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-13, 07:31 AM   #49
cryptid01
one less horse
 
cryptid01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: East Jesus NY
Bikes: are better than yours
Posts: 5,600
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by formicaman View Post
Correct me if I'm wrong(and I usually am), but as far as I know weight really only matters when it's rolling weight, aka wheels. Beyond that, extra pounds don't make any more difference on the bike than on your person, so a lock, water, or a beer belly all make the same difference -not much. Am I right here?
nope.

A 230 lb person on a 20 lb bike will always be faster than a 130 lb person on a 120 lb bike.
cryptid01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-13, 12:18 PM   #50
Pamestique 
Shredding Grandma!
 
Pamestique's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: So Cal
Bikes: I don't own any bikes
Posts: 4,795
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cryptid01 View Post
nope.

A 230 lb person on a 20 lb bike will always be faster than a 130 lb person on a 120 lb bike.
Was that intended not to make sense?
__________________
______________________________________________________________

Private docent led mountain bike rides through Limestone Canyon. Go to letsgooutside.org and register today! Also available: hikes, equestrian rides and family events as well as trail maintenance and science study.
Pamestique is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:29 AM.