Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-05-13, 09:56 AM   #1
ohiogsp
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Fresno, California
Bikes: S-Works Tarmac, Guru Flite, Santa Cruz Superlight, Origin 8 Crawler
Posts: 34
Brake rotors choices

I am buying new rotors and was wondering what is the deal with the rotors with hardly any steel there? Some are pretty solid with just holes then some are like nothing left. I am getting 203mm and don't do downhill stuff so heat is not a huge deal for me but want alot of stopping power. Thanks
ohiogsp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-13, 11:44 AM   #2
thehammerdog
Senior Member
 
thehammerdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
Posts: 2,060
is there after mrket options s one could Upgrade to lighter rotors?? Or are most the same? Mine sux
thehammerdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-13, 06:31 PM   #3
Lew.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: England, Great Britain
Bikes: Tarmac/LangsterPro/Epic
Posts: 261
More holes/cutouts = more surface area for cooling, the greater amount of air that gets to the disc, means more air to cool them.
(Shimano had an 'ice' system where they had an aluminium core for heat dissipation).

I guess there's also the whole 'weight' thing, but I guess that's not a concern if you're after 203mm.
Lew. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-13, 07:34 PM   #4
cryptid01
one less horse
 
cryptid01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: East Jesus NY
Bikes: are better than yours
Posts: 5,600
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lew. View Post
More holes/cutouts = more surface area for cooling, the greater amount of air that gets to the disc, means more air to cool them.
Fewer holes/cutouts usually = greater thermal mass which allows the rotor to absorb more heat before overcooking.

Choose wisely.
cryptid01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-13, 09:57 PM   #5
floating dutchy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: New Zealand
Bikes: 2013 GT Karakoram 3.0 29er Hardtail
Posts: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by thehammerdog View Post
is there after mrket options s one could Upgrade to lighter rotors?? Or are most the same? Mine sux
Why do you say yours suck? What is the difference between different designs?
floating dutchy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-13, 09:59 AM   #6
Bandrada
Bandolero
 
Bandrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Land of Enhancement
Bikes: ...
Posts: 384
I have never actually put much thought into it, but in my experience performance is mostly isolated to the braking system and not necessarily in the rotors. I'm assuming the 203 is on the front. That's plenty of stopping power so just about any style of rotor will do. For the purposes of aesthetics I generally try and match the front and back, but that's just being picky.
Bandrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-13, 09:28 PM   #7
floating dutchy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: New Zealand
Bikes: 2013 GT Karakoram 3.0 29er Hardtail
Posts: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandrada View Post
I have never actually put much thought into it, but in my experience performance is mostly isolated to the braking system and not necessarily in the rotors. I'm assuming the 203 is on the front. That's plenty of stopping power so just about any style of rotor will do. For the purposes of aesthetics I generally try and match the front and back, but that's just being picky.
Yea? I like the look of the bigger rotor on the front, form following function I guess, I do like having a 180 up front and a 160 back there, Makes the brakes feel more even.
floating dutchy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-13, 10:59 PM   #8
Bandrada
Bandolero
 
Bandrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Land of Enhancement
Bikes: ...
Posts: 384
Quote:
Originally Posted by floating dutchy View Post
Yea? I like the look of the bigger rotor on the front, form following function I guess, I do like having a 180 up front and a 160 back there, Makes the brakes feel more even.
Don't misunderstand, dutch. I'm sure there are rotors that are aesthetically pleasing, and yet their performance is sub-par. Maybe I've been lucky, but I've never actually run into such a scenario. Probably because skulls and bones aren't really that appealing to me. haha! For instance, I just purchased some Hope rotors (203F/183R) and while they are quite impressive to look at, their performance is also top notch. Granted they are on a trail bike, and like you I'm not too concerned with them overheating. It's a good conversation, anyway. Now that I'm wondering about it, it's very possible that the composition of the rotor is of significant importance.
Bandrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-13, 11:31 PM   #9
fietsbob 
coprolite
 
fietsbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 7
Posts: 18,081
got money to throw at it .. ceramic- carbon fiber discs with their own special pads are out there.

at a more modest cost the aluminum cores are a heat-sink for the steel disc

rather than cooking your hydraulic fluid.

lighter? Titanium .. there is a steel aluminum sandwich too..

Last edited by fietsbob; 12-19-13 at 01:15 AM.
fietsbob is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-13, 11:47 PM   #10
Bandrada
Bandolero
 
Bandrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Land of Enhancement
Bikes: ...
Posts: 384
Quote:
Originally Posted by fietsbob View Post
got money to throw at it .. ceramic- carbon fiber discs with their own special pads are out there.

at a more modest cost the aluminum cores are a heat-sink for the steel disc rather than cooking your hydraulic fluid.
I don't think heat is an issue. Are there materials that have better friction capabilities, which allow manufacturers to be more creative with the design? I have a pair of XT rotors that have have the aluminum spider. I can't say I've ever seen a marked improvement in performance. Although they work really well, and are easy to true. Again, overheating is rarely an issue. Of course, some other added benefits are that they look pretty cool, and are noticeable lighter.
Bandrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-13, 11:53 PM   #11
fietsbob 
coprolite
 
fietsbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Bikes: 7
Posts: 18,081
I have Avid G2 discs 4 hole Rohloff rear 6 hole with a centerlock adapter in front BB7 mechanicals

160 front and rear in 20" wheels in my bike friday ... mine work fine but my needs are not yours

and I cannot test ride your bike to judge for myself , so this is mostly Idle chit chat..

cheers
fietsbob is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:22 PM.