Crank ring spacing 7/8 vs 9 speed crankset
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Novi, MI
Posts: 539
Bikes: Franken-mountain bike, mid-90s Performance TR1000, 1990 Cannondale ST400
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Crank ring spacing 7/8 vs 9 speed crankset
Hello again folks,
Back to pick your collective brains! I use my trusty ol' frankenbike for both winter as well as trail riding (and formerly for year round commuting before I got my road bike), and the drivetrain is getting pretty tired. After riding this winter, all the snow and salt has started taking a noticeable toll despite my best efforts to clean everything up after I ride. Not to mention the parts that I used when putting the bike together are 2006 Acera 3x7 components which had been in use for quite a while before I wrecked really hard as a kid and decided to take a break from mountain biking. So, I recently began investing in a 9 speed upgrade. Thus far I've got a set of SRAM X9 ball bearing shifters, with an X7 rear and X5 front derailleurs, PG-970 cassette and a chain on the way.
As money doesn't grow on trees, and the crankset being the most expensive part of this upgrade, I wonder if I can get away with using my old one for a while. Looking online, I've seen some people say a 7/8 speed crankset will work OK with this setup (with front shifting being a bit tedious but doable), while others say that it won't work at all. So, my question(s) to you:
From personal experience, can anyone confirm or deny whether such a thing will work? Or, alternatively, can anyone definitively quote the chainring spacing difference between 7/8 and 9 speed cranksets? I can't seem to locate it online, even on Sheldon Brown's site.
My backup plan at this point is to run it as a 1x9 until I can afford a decent 9 speed crankset, since I don't leave the middle chainring on the trail unless I'm fighting a particularly steep climb.
Thanks in advance for your input!
Back to pick your collective brains! I use my trusty ol' frankenbike for both winter as well as trail riding (and formerly for year round commuting before I got my road bike), and the drivetrain is getting pretty tired. After riding this winter, all the snow and salt has started taking a noticeable toll despite my best efforts to clean everything up after I ride. Not to mention the parts that I used when putting the bike together are 2006 Acera 3x7 components which had been in use for quite a while before I wrecked really hard as a kid and decided to take a break from mountain biking. So, I recently began investing in a 9 speed upgrade. Thus far I've got a set of SRAM X9 ball bearing shifters, with an X7 rear and X5 front derailleurs, PG-970 cassette and a chain on the way.
As money doesn't grow on trees, and the crankset being the most expensive part of this upgrade, I wonder if I can get away with using my old one for a while. Looking online, I've seen some people say a 7/8 speed crankset will work OK with this setup (with front shifting being a bit tedious but doable), while others say that it won't work at all. So, my question(s) to you:
From personal experience, can anyone confirm or deny whether such a thing will work? Or, alternatively, can anyone definitively quote the chainring spacing difference between 7/8 and 9 speed cranksets? I can't seem to locate it online, even on Sheldon Brown's site.
My backup plan at this point is to run it as a 1x9 until I can afford a decent 9 speed crankset, since I don't leave the middle chainring on the trail unless I'm fighting a particularly steep climb.
Thanks in advance for your input!
#3
will stop for donuts
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Maine
Posts: 214
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
^that. Chain size is different between 7/8 and 9, but ring size doesn't change. You'll be fine.
Although with a new chain, new cassette, and new der., having old, worn chainrings will cause your chain to wear a little more, and it might skip every now and then. So replace when you can -- but in the mean time, just ride
Although with a new chain, new cassette, and new der., having old, worn chainrings will cause your chain to wear a little more, and it might skip every now and then. So replace when you can -- but in the mean time, just ride
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Novi, MI
Posts: 539
Bikes: Franken-mountain bike, mid-90s Performance TR1000, 1990 Cannondale ST400
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Awesome, thanks guys. I've bought a lightly used chain on CL in anticipation, can't wait to get the bike together!
#5
Bike Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: South of Raleigh, North of New Hill, East of Harris Lake, NC
Posts: 9,622
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Specialized Roubaix, Giant OCR-C, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, Stumpjumper Comp, 88 & 92Nishiki Ariel, 87 Centurion Ironman, 92 Paramount, 84 Nishiki Medalist
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 68 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 37 Times
in
27 Posts
Been there, done that swap, no problem using the 7 speed cranks.
__________________
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mattp89
Mountain Biking
3
10-31-16 01:37 PM
tjc4golf
Bicycle Mechanics
4
04-18-10 12:36 PM