News Article On The Anniversary Of Jim Rogers' Death
#1
Friendship is Magic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26413 Post(s)
Liked 10,380 Times
in
7,208 Posts
News Article On The Anniversary Of Jim Rogers' Death
__________________
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fair Oaks,CA
Posts: 736
Bikes: Kestrel RT1000 & Calfee Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Saw it too. What a shame. I ride that road a lot. It does make me a little nervous climbing out of the river towards Colfax because the road doesn't have any shoulder. It isn't a high speed road either because it is so twisty, but it requires the drivers to pay attention to driving, not screwing around with cell phones, etc.
#4
Erect member since 1953
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Antioch, CA (SF Bay Area)
Posts: 7,000
Bikes: Trek 520 Grando, Roubaix Expert, Motobecane Ti Century Elite turned commuter, Some old French thing gone fixie
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 38 Times
in
21 Posts
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Good article. I wish I hadn't looked at the online comments.
#6
Don't mince words
#8
always rides with luggage
And also a choice of hanging or the firing squad.
__________________
--Ben
2006 Trek SU100, 2009 Motobecane Fantom CX, 2011 Motobecane Fantom Cross Uno, and a Bakfiets
Previously: 2000 Trek 4500 (2000-2003), 2003 Novara Randonee (2003-2006), 2003 Giant Rainier (2003-2008), 2005 Xootr Swift (2005-2007), 2007 Nashbar 1x9 (2007-2011), 2011 Windsor Shetland (2011-2014), 2008 Citizen Folder (2015)
Non-Bike hardware: MX Linux / BunsenLabs Linux / Raspbian / Mac OS 10.6 / Android 7
--Ben
2006 Trek SU100, 2009 Motobecane Fantom CX, 2011 Motobecane Fantom Cross Uno, and a Bakfiets
Previously: 2000 Trek 4500 (2000-2003), 2003 Novara Randonee (2003-2006), 2003 Giant Rainier (2003-2008), 2005 Xootr Swift (2005-2007), 2007 Nashbar 1x9 (2007-2011), 2011 Windsor Shetland (2011-2014), 2008 Citizen Folder (2015)
Non-Bike hardware: MX Linux / BunsenLabs Linux / Raspbian / Mac OS 10.6 / Android 7
#9
phony collective progress
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Hoosey
Posts: 2,973
Bikes: https://velospace.org/user/36663
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
I keep Javascript disabled unless I allow it on a site-by-site basis. A great side effect of this is that the festering boil that is the comments section of most websites is called by Javascript, and thus doesn't display.
#10
Friendship is Magic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26413 Post(s)
Liked 10,380 Times
in
7,208 Posts
I went through a difficult period late last summer/
early fall when we had the string of auto vs bicycle
fatalities here in Sacramento.
I was reading those comments, many apparently
posted by troglodyte scum with nuttin' better to
do that day. It is not until you think about it and
realize that all of them drive (many apparently rather
large vehicles), that the full import and consequences
of such attitudes start to become apparent.
I was pretty paranoid before that, but i would now
describe my riding style as nothing short of "war
zone survival mode". Just the way it is in my lifetime,
i guess.
I stopped reading the comments sections on these, but
I'm grateful for the edification. Only takes one person
to kill you.
Mike Larmer
early fall when we had the string of auto vs bicycle
fatalities here in Sacramento.
I was reading those comments, many apparently
posted by troglodyte scum with nuttin' better to
do that day. It is not until you think about it and
realize that all of them drive (many apparently rather
large vehicles), that the full import and consequences
of such attitudes start to become apparent.
I was pretty paranoid before that, but i would now
describe my riding style as nothing short of "war
zone survival mode". Just the way it is in my lifetime,
i guess.
I stopped reading the comments sections on these, but
I'm grateful for the edification. Only takes one person
to kill you.
Mike Larmer
__________________
#11
Full Member
That's what the guy who right hooked me in November said
in the police report: "I never saw him!"
I suspect he was on a hands free cell phone when he passed me and apparently forgot about me. I really think reading this article that the driver was on the phone (or doing something really important like looking for a CD).
How in the world did people live in the olden days, like 20 years ago, w/o cell phones?
What the heck do people talk about for hours on end-what they're planning on having for lunch or picking up at Costco after work? (I ask this as one of seven people in California who doesn't have a cell phone.)
I mean cell phones can be useful tools but their usage shouldn't be allowed in cars. This seems beyond obvious to me.
I suspect he was on a hands free cell phone when he passed me and apparently forgot about me. I really think reading this article that the driver was on the phone (or doing something really important like looking for a CD).
How in the world did people live in the olden days, like 20 years ago, w/o cell phones?
What the heck do people talk about for hours on end-what they're planning on having for lunch or picking up at Costco after work? (I ask this as one of seven people in California who doesn't have a cell phone.)
I mean cell phones can be useful tools but their usage shouldn't be allowed in cars. This seems beyond obvious to me.
#12
Friendship is Magic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26413 Post(s)
Liked 10,380 Times
in
7,208 Posts
#13
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,653
Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1025 Post(s)
Liked 2,525 Times
in
1,055 Posts
By itself, "I didn't see him" is an automatic admission that the driver didn't see him - nothing more. There can be a host of reasons for this. Dumb inattentiveness is only one of them, and that's what it sounds like here, or the DA wouldn't be prosecuting this the way he/she is.
But what if the road at that place and time was headed directly into blinding sunlight? What if is was foggy/dusky/early morning with resultant bad lighting and the rider was in low-contrast clothing and no lights? What if the road was going into and out of the shadows at short intervals, making it next to impossible to see from the sunny spots into the shady spots? In any given situation, there can be mitigating circumstances.
Don't get me wrong - in far too many instances, the driver is simply being an idiot. It sounds like that was the case here. In such cases, the driver should have to face the consequences, criminal, civil, and moral, of their actions.
But just as it is wrong to assume that every car-bike collision is the cyclist's fault (are you listening, CHP and police departments?), it is wrong to assume that every such collision is the driver's fault. "I didn't see him" will, in many instances, equal an admission of fault in light of all of the surrounding circumstances. But it may also mean that the driver didn't see the cyclist because the cyclist could not be seen for reasons beyond the driver's control.
Sometimes, sh*t just happens. The fact that it sure sounds like this is not one of those times doesn't mean it isn't so some of the time.
I guess my point it - don't be so quick to make such sweeping generalizations based on one incident, even one terrible incident. Be glad that this DA is taking this incident seriously. Be incredibly sorry that the incident happened at all. And be very, very grateful you weren't there in any capacity because there but for the Grace if God go us all.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
#14
RacingBear
Not necessarily.
By itself, "I didn't see him" is an automatic admission that the driver didn't see him - nothing more. There can be a host of reasons for this. Dumb inattentiveness is only one of them, and that's what it sounds like here, or the DA wouldn't be prosecuting this the way he/she is.
But what if the road at that place and time was headed directly into blinding sunlight? What if is was foggy/dusky/early morning with resultant bad lighting and the rider was in low-contrast clothing and no lights? What if the road was going into and out of the shadows at short intervals, making it next to impossible to see from the sunny spots into the shady spots? In any given situation, there can be mitigating circumstances.
By itself, "I didn't see him" is an automatic admission that the driver didn't see him - nothing more. There can be a host of reasons for this. Dumb inattentiveness is only one of them, and that's what it sounds like here, or the DA wouldn't be prosecuting this the way he/she is.
But what if the road at that place and time was headed directly into blinding sunlight? What if is was foggy/dusky/early morning with resultant bad lighting and the rider was in low-contrast clothing and no lights? What if the road was going into and out of the shadows at short intervals, making it next to impossible to see from the sunny spots into the shady spots? In any given situation, there can be mitigating circumstances.
Sometimes, sh*t just happens. The fact that it sure sounds like this is not one of those times doesn't mean it isn't so some of the time.
I guess my point it - don't be so quick to make such sweeping generalizations based on one incident, even one terrible incident. Be glad that this DA is taking this incident seriously. Be incredibly sorry that the incident happened at all. And be very, very grateful you weren't there in any capacity because there but for the Grace if God go us all.
I guess my point it - don't be so quick to make such sweeping generalizations based on one incident, even one terrible incident. Be glad that this DA is taking this incident seriously. Be incredibly sorry that the incident happened at all. And be very, very grateful you weren't there in any capacity because there but for the Grace if God go us all.
On one incident? How about on incident a week ago on Foothil where a driver "didn't see" a cyclist as he was driving in a bike lane, or a driver who didn't see SClaraPokeman or the lady who T-boned me when she made a left turn in a shopping mall from the opposite lane. She didn't see me either as I was coming towards her in my lane in neon green hiviz jacket. These are just ones I remembered from the top of my head and the recent/local ones.
Then there was hit and run on 9 that left a cyclist in pretty bad condition. Or how about cyclist killed by a young women in SUV as she left the roadway and hit an older woman on a bicycle in a bike lane. She didn't see her either. Then there was an incident in Oregon, I believe, where a driver turned left in front of descending cyclist. Cyclist was killed. Driver also "didn't see him". Of course you are right there are circumstances where driver really didn't see a cyclist. Like a Santa Clara Deputy who fell a sleep and ran over three cyclists killing two. He is still with the department by the way, but behind the desk so he can only make 70k (if I remember correctly from the article) a year.
#15
Don't mince words
Not necessarily.
By itself, "I didn't see him" is an automatic admission that the driver didn't see him - nothing more. There can be a host of reasons for this. Dumb inattentiveness is only one of them, and that's what it sounds like here, or the DA wouldn't be prosecuting this the way he/she is.
But what if the road at that place and time was headed directly into blinding sunlight? What if is was foggy/dusky/early morning with resultant bad lighting and the rider was in low-contrast clothing and no lights? What if the road was going into and out of the shadows at short intervals, making it next to impossible to see from the sunny spots into the shady spots? In any given situation, there can be mitigating circumstances.
Don't get me wrong - in far too many instances, the driver is simply being an idiot. It sounds like that was the case here. In such cases, the driver should have to face the consequences, criminal, civil, and moral, of their actions.
But just as it is wrong to assume that every car-bike collision is the cyclist's fault (are you listening, CHP and police departments?), it is wrong to assume that every such collision is the driver's fault. "I didn't see him" will, in many instances, equal an admission of fault in light of all of the surrounding circumstances. But it may also mean that the driver didn't see the cyclist because the cyclist could not be seen for reasons beyond the driver's control.
Sometimes, sh*t just happens. The fact that it sure sounds like this is not one of those times doesn't mean it isn't so some of the time.
I guess my point it - don't be so quick to make such sweeping generalizations based on one incident, even one terrible incident. Be glad that this DA is taking this incident seriously. Be incredibly sorry that the incident happened at all. And be very, very grateful you weren't there in any capacity because there but for the Grace if God go us all.
By itself, "I didn't see him" is an automatic admission that the driver didn't see him - nothing more. There can be a host of reasons for this. Dumb inattentiveness is only one of them, and that's what it sounds like here, or the DA wouldn't be prosecuting this the way he/she is.
But what if the road at that place and time was headed directly into blinding sunlight? What if is was foggy/dusky/early morning with resultant bad lighting and the rider was in low-contrast clothing and no lights? What if the road was going into and out of the shadows at short intervals, making it next to impossible to see from the sunny spots into the shady spots? In any given situation, there can be mitigating circumstances.
Don't get me wrong - in far too many instances, the driver is simply being an idiot. It sounds like that was the case here. In such cases, the driver should have to face the consequences, criminal, civil, and moral, of their actions.
But just as it is wrong to assume that every car-bike collision is the cyclist's fault (are you listening, CHP and police departments?), it is wrong to assume that every such collision is the driver's fault. "I didn't see him" will, in many instances, equal an admission of fault in light of all of the surrounding circumstances. But it may also mean that the driver didn't see the cyclist because the cyclist could not be seen for reasons beyond the driver's control.
Sometimes, sh*t just happens. The fact that it sure sounds like this is not one of those times doesn't mean it isn't so some of the time.
I guess my point it - don't be so quick to make such sweeping generalizations based on one incident, even one terrible incident. Be glad that this DA is taking this incident seriously. Be incredibly sorry that the incident happened at all. And be very, very grateful you weren't there in any capacity because there but for the Grace if God go us all.
#16
Friendship is Magic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26413 Post(s)
Liked 10,380 Times
in
7,208 Posts
This Is Actually A Pretty Universal Topic Of Discussion
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12149696
So I am somewhat dismayed that we seem
powerless to do something to change the
situation.
Mike Larmer
So I am somewhat dismayed that we seem
powerless to do something to change the
situation.
Mike Larmer
__________________
#17
RacingBear
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12149696
So I am somewhat dismayed that we seem
powerless to do something to change the
situation.
Mike Larmer
So I am somewhat dismayed that we seem
powerless to do something to change the
situation.
Mike Larmer
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CrankyOne
Commuting
69
11-15-13 11:45 AM
johnny99
Northern California
14
09-07-10 01:57 AM