Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 40
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    10,387
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Santa Clara University professor badly hurt in Los Gatos bicycle crash

    Incident was Wednesday morning at 7:40am on Los Gatos Blvd.
    Bicyclist was heading straight and was cut off by a SUV turning left.
    The police are looking for witnesses.

    http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_18149847

  2. #2
    RacingBear UmneyDurak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    8,094
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Explorer's driver, San Jose resident Juan Antonio Rodriguez-Gallegos, 42, was cited for being an unlicensed driver. The cause of the accident remains under investigation.
    Freaken scum.
    I see hills.... Bring them on!!!
    Stay calm and bring a towel.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Stanford, CA
    My Bikes
    Argon 18 Krypton
    Posts
    59
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Alongside the bike lane, a row of cars were stopped waiting for the light to turn green at the Highway 9 intersection. Just then, a Ford Explorer made a left turn through the stopped traffic using the "keep clear" space and was hit broadside by Saghari's bike.
    Sounds like the rider would be at least partially hidden from the SUV by the line of cars (not that that is a valid excuse). Dangerous and unfortunate situation; be careful out there. I hope he pulls through okay.

  4. #4
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Ygduf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Redwood City, CA
    My Bikes
    road bikes
    Posts
    5,861
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Commuting makes me nervous, and I ride like 10k miles/year. It only takes 1 blind/careless driver.

    twitter.com/ygduf
    strava.com/athletes/ygduf

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    180
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    You notice the bias

    in the Mercury article? It makes it sound like the bicyclist ran into the SUV and it was his fault--when it sounds to me his right of way was violated.

    No matter, if the police determine he was in fact riding faster than they think he should have been riding, they're going to say it was his fault.

    It's possible the helmet didn't help much if he planted his face first into the SUV's side.

    I agree that commuting can be harrowing. Most drivers see a bike and figure that cyclists are putting in the same limited energy into the bike that they themselves would. Therefore they won't think anyone could possibly be riding 18-19 mph and will then make turns to violate cyclist's right of way. Of course that's if they notice the bicyclist at all.

    Driving Central and other roads to my job, I w/o doubt notice bicyclists to a much greater degree when they have head & taillights on in all conditions. PLEASE BE SEEN! USE YOUR LIGHTS!

  6. #6
    The Left Coast, USA FrenchFit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,414
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I wonder if it was a pedestrian that was crossing the intersection under green light the author would have written.. the pedestrian crashed into the side of the SUV. Maybe I'm of base here, but I think I've seem this attitude a few times before in the Mercury News reproting bike accidents...I don't get where these "journalists" are coming from.

  7. #7
    Idealistic Troublemaker bjorke's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    SF Bay Area + Surrounding Planet
    My Bikes
    Bike Friday, Soma, Fuji, Haro, No_Name...
    Posts
    605
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FrenchFit View Post
    the pedestrian crashed into the side of the SUV. ...I don't get where these "journalists" are coming from.
    Well-put. The byline is to Mike Rosenberg, who recently left the San Mateo Times & is a self-described "transportation reporter" for the Mercury News. Reminds me of the pro-car bias described in Forester's "Effective Cycling" back in 1980s Palo Alto.

  8. #8
    Chainstay Brake Mafia
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    5,853
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i didn't notice any bias in the article. how else would you describe a bike running into the side of a car?
    Last edited by frantik; 06-02-11 at 03:54 AM.
    1986 Diamondback Apex ~ 1988 Diamondback Ascent EX ~ 1989 Jamis Dakar ~ 1989 Specialized Stumpjumper Comp
    1993 Trek 8300 Composite ~ 1993 Diamondback Axis Team Titanium ~ 1995 Diamondback Apex

    Join the Chainstay Brake Mafia!

  9. #9
    Too Fat for This Sport Diegomayra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Northern California
    My Bikes
    2011 Cannondale Supersix
    Posts
    689
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by frantik View Post
    i didn't notice any bias in the article. how else would you describe a bike running into the side of a car?
    No bias. It sounds like an unfortunate accident that could've happen to anyone of us.

  10. #10
    VNA
    VNA is offline
    Senior Member VNA's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    37.893 N, 122.124 W
    Posts
    412
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by SClaraPokeman View Post
    in the Mercury article? It makes it sound like the bicyclist ran into the SUV and it was his fault--when it sounds to me his right of way was violated.

    No matter, if the police determine he was in fact riding faster than they think he should have been riding, they're going to say it was his fault.
    . . . I w/o doubt notice bicyclists to a much greater degree when they have head & taillights on in all conditions. PLEASE BE SEEN! USE YOUR LIGHTS!
    I had that very same accident on Danville blvd in Alamo (East Bay) and the police said I was going too fast. I dented the fender the hood and broke the windshield and I came out with a serious concussion (with helmet) that left me with a non functioning pituitary gland well after a dozen years. The driver's insurance did pay everything including a new bike and everything else including "pain and suffering" (the driver was cited as well)

    It looks geeky and goofy, but today I ride with a front and rear blinking bright lights--although I don't know wether it would have helped when one drive through stopped cross traffic?

    I wish the professor a very speedy recovery.

  11. #11
    You gonna eat that? Doohickie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
    My Bikes
    1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS
    Posts
    13,953
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by SClaraPokeman View Post
    It makes it sound like the bicyclist ran into the SUV and it was his fault--when it sounds to me his right of way was violated.
    The two choices are not mutually exclusive, you know. Just because his right-of-way was violated does not mean he wasn't going too fast for conditions. If I'm driving a car and come to a busy intersection with a "KEEP CLEAR" space, I sure as heck am not going to enter it going full speed if the other traffic lanes are stopped; I would slow to a crawl. On a bicycle there's even more reason to do so. For a PhD, he didn't seem to have much traffic sense.
    I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.



    Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."

  12. #12
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    20
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Most PhDs don't have much common sense, traffic or otherwise.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    10,387
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Don't blame the victim. The article says nothing about how fast the bicyclist was moving, how fast the SUV was moving, or how closely the SUV cut off the bicyclist.

    Very possible that the bicyclist was moving very slowly and carefully, but the SUV was going so fast that the bicyclist did not see it until it was too late. Also, the SUV's momentum could have caused all of the bicyclist's injuries.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    180
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    To clarify about bias

    My point was that stating that the cyclist “hit” the SUV implies that it was the fault of the cyclist. Perhaps the story could have been written “the SUV turned in front of the cyclist, cutting him off and causing a collision.” Maybe that’s a bit awkward but I think it conveys the truth of what happened more accurately.

    The problem with the “unsafe speed” for the conditions traffic provision is that it will almost always give the police a way to blame a cyclist for virtually any accident. It’s almost like if you are involved in one you were going the wrong speed-Ergo it’s your fault. I’m probably a bit touchy about this as I’ve now been subject to this treatment by the Sunnyvale PD (BTW-I learned that police opinion as to fault isn’t admissible in court).

    Good point Johnny 99 about the SUV supplying momentum for the collusion.

    One other thing about the story that may be misleading is the report he was wearing a helmet and was still severely injured, which gives the false impression helmets are ineffectual. I know from experience helmets really work, my feeling is that in many car/cyclist incidents, people hit with their face first and the protection that helmets offer unfortunately don’t really come into play.

    FWIW, I read in some other forum that blinking front lights are illegal in CA.

  15. #15
    You gonna eat that? Doohickie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
    My Bikes
    1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS
    Posts
    13,953
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by SClaraPokeman View Post
    My point was that stating that the cyclist “hit” the SUV implies that it was the fault of the cyclist. Perhaps the story could have been written “the SUV turned in front of the cyclist, cutting him off and causing a collision.”
    You're splitting hairs, and in trying to suggest "non-biased" wording, showing your own pro-cyclist bias off in spades.
    I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.



    Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."

  16. #16
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Ygduf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Redwood City, CA
    My Bikes
    road bikes
    Posts
    5,861
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Doohickie View Post
    The two choices are not mutually exclusive, you know. Just because his right-of-way was violated does not mean he wasn't going too fast for conditions. If I'm driving a car and come to a busy intersection with a "KEEP CLEAR" space, I sure as heck am not going to enter it going full speed if the other traffic lanes are stopped; I would slow to a crawl. On a bicycle there's even more reason to do so. For a PhD, he didn't seem to have much traffic sense.
    I imagine you say similar things for scantily clad **** victims, right?

    What's the proper speed to be travelling when you plan on a car pulling in front of you, causing an unavoidable accident? Zero mph?

    twitter.com/ygduf
    strava.com/athletes/ygduf

  17. #17
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Ygduf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Redwood City, CA
    My Bikes
    road bikes
    Posts
    5,861
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by johnny99 View Post
    Don't blame the victim. The article says nothing about how fast the bicyclist was moving, how fast the SUV was moving, or how closely the SUV cut off the bicyclist.

    Very possible that the bicyclist was moving very slowly and carefully, but the SUV was going so fast that the bicyclist did not see it until it was too late. Also, the SUV's momentum could have caused all of the bicyclist's injuries.
    QFT. It's referred to as "fault" for a reason.

    twitter.com/ygduf
    strava.com/athletes/ygduf

  18. #18
    Chainstay Brake Mafia
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    5,853
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My point was that stating that the cyclist “hit” the SUV implies that it was the fault of the cyclist
    the bicyclist DID crash into the SUV... the article makes no mention of who is at fault.
    1986 Diamondback Apex ~ 1988 Diamondback Ascent EX ~ 1989 Jamis Dakar ~ 1989 Specialized Stumpjumper Comp
    1993 Trek 8300 Composite ~ 1993 Diamondback Axis Team Titanium ~ 1995 Diamondback Apex

    Join the Chainstay Brake Mafia!

  19. #19
    You gonna eat that? Doohickie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
    My Bikes
    1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS
    Posts
    13,953
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ygduf View Post
    I imagine you say similar things for scantily clad **** victims, right?

    What's the proper speed to be travelling when you plan on a car pulling in front of you, causing an unavoidable accident? Zero mph?
    If I'm rolling along next to a stopped line of cars, I'm probably going no faster than an easy trotting pace, perhaps even a walking pace. People are too stoopid; I don't trust them even when I have the right of way.

    And yeah.... I probably would say similar things about **** victims if they dressed provocatively, went to a party in a bad part of town, and drank out of cups handed to them by strangers. Part of being an adult is knowing when to take proper precautions to minimize risk in certain situations.
    I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.



    Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."

  20. #20
    Erect member since 1953 cccorlew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Antioch, CA (SF Bay Area)
    My Bikes
    Roubaix Expert, Motobecane Fantom Outlaw turned commuter, Cannondale F500 Mtn bike, Some old French thing gone fixie
    Posts
    6,552
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Here's a copy of the note I sent to the Merc News reporter, his editor, and the letters to the editor page.

    Mike Rosenberg,

    I am disappointed in your reporting on Santa Clara University professor Bahram Saghari, who was involved in a traffic collision while cycling.
    http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-cou...nclick_check=1

    As a professional writer, you know the power of the subtle use of language.

    You wrote “...rode his bicycle into an SUV.” While this may be technically correct, this sentence gives the incorrect impression that Saghari is at fault.

    Then you wrote “Just then, a Ford Explorer made a left turn through the stopped traffic using the “keep clear” space….”
    You didn't write about the driver, you wrote about the Ford, like the Ford somehow made the turn on it's own.

    I realize these are subtle inflections, but they contribute to your readers perceptions in a way that I hope you don't intend.

    I encourage you to examine your writing, and attempt to avoid describing events that in a way that unnecessarily colors them.
    Where we as cyclists connect the dots, this sort of reporting gives the general public the idea that somehow another crazed cyclist injured himself on an innocent car.

    As to whether the cyclist could have prevented this, maybe. We should all drive and ride defensively. But if someone were to suddenly turn left in front of you while you were driving and you hit them, I'll bet you'd have choice words for the unsafe left turner and would never think of the collision as your fault.
    Last edited by cccorlew; 06-03-11 at 08:00 AM.
    WANTED: Not a darn thing. I've got it all. Life is good.
    Website at curtis.corlew.com —— Bicycle blog at ccorlew.blogspot.com

  21. #21
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Ygduf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Redwood City, CA
    My Bikes
    road bikes
    Posts
    5,861
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Doohickie View Post
    And yeah.... I probably would say similar things about **** victims if they dressed provocatively, went to a party in a bad part of town, and drank out of cups handed to them by strangers. Part of being an adult is knowing when to take proper precautions to minimize risk in certain situations.
    As long as you're cool with that making you a giant *******.

    I hope you survive your first bike vs. car with enough intact to make a post. I'll be first in line saying you were riding too fast without enough lights.

    twitter.com/ygduf
    strava.com/athletes/ygduf

  22. #22
    Crawlin' up, flyin' down bikingshearer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
    My Bikes
    1967 Paramount, 1982-ish Ron Cooper,1986 De Rosa Professional, 1978 Eisentraut "A," 1961 BianchiCompetizione, 1994 Trek 520, 199? Burley Bossa Nova
    Posts
    3,048
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Count me as one who sees a bias against the cyclist in the article. The opening of the article does convey subtle but clear message that the cyclist was at fault because he ran into the car.

    I don't know if the bias was intentional or not. I also don't know for sure that the author actually wrote the phrase that does it - reporters have editors who often change or delete what is handed to them. I have no way of knowing if that happened here.

    I also don't know how fast the cyclist was going, what the driver's view was, or any of a number of other important facts. Bottom line: the reporting is at best incomplete (not surprising, and I do not mean that in a nasty way - important facts may not have been available to the reporter by deadline), but it does convey more fault on the cyclist than the then-currently available facts justify for exactly the reasons cccorlew states.

    But the real bottom line here is: (a) I hope the prof recovers; (b) I'm glad he was wearing a helmet - it couldn't have hurt and may have saved his life (although we have no way to know that, either, from this article); and (c) there is a lesson in this for all of us.

    And since when was it okay to assume the guy was out to lunch because he had the wherewithal to earn a Ph.D? You know nothing about this man except what was in the article, which means you don't know the first thing about him. Your slurs are no better than making assumptions based on race, gender, or religion. Shame on you.
    "I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney

  23. #23
    Erect member since 1953 cccorlew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Antioch, CA (SF Bay Area)
    My Bikes
    Roubaix Expert, Motobecane Fantom Outlaw turned commuter, Cannondale F500 Mtn bike, Some old French thing gone fixie
    Posts
    6,552
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Here's a blog entry at cyclelicious with a photo/graphic that's pretty telling.
    I still contend that if you are in your bike lane and someone left hooks you it's totally their fault.
    http://www.cyclelicio.us/2011/left-c...res-professor/
    WANTED: Not a darn thing. I've got it all. Life is good.
    Website at curtis.corlew.com —— Bicycle blog at ccorlew.blogspot.com

  24. #24
    Chainstay Brake Mafia
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    California
    Posts
    5,853
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cccorlew View Post
    I still contend that if you are in your bike lane and someone left hooks you it's totally their fault.
    of course.. the person turning has to ensure the lane is clear. but as a biker, since your risk is greater, you really need to watch out for stuff like this.

    legally i think the driver should be found at fault, but it is possible the biker could have done more to avoid the accident. having the law on your side doesn't do you much good when you're dead :\

    i hope the biker guy recovers
    1986 Diamondback Apex ~ 1988 Diamondback Ascent EX ~ 1989 Jamis Dakar ~ 1989 Specialized Stumpjumper Comp
    1993 Trek 8300 Composite ~ 1993 Diamondback Axis Team Titanium ~ 1995 Diamondback Apex

    Join the Chainstay Brake Mafia!

  25. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    10,387
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by frantik View Post
    but it is possible the biker could have done more to avoid the accident
    You can say the same thing about every single bicycle crash. Probably every single car crash as well. Until you have enough information to make specific accusations, I say give the victim the benefit of the doubt.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •