Go Back  Bike Forums > Community Connections > Regional Discussions > Pacific Northwest
Reload this Page >

Followup on traffic ticket I got in Renton

Search
Notices
Pacific Northwest Idaho | Oregon | Washington | Alaska

Followup on traffic ticket I got in Renton

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-09, 02:22 PM
  #1  
Laid back bent rider
Thread Starter
 
unixpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Burien, WA
Posts: 1,134

Bikes: Bacchetta Giro 20

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Followup on traffic ticket I got in Renton

Last July, I posted this thread about a traffic ticket I got while commuting through Renton. I was cited for not riding as closely to the right side of the road as possible, and for failing to signal my turn from Rainer Ave. S. into S.W. Sunset. Yesterday I had my court appearance.

I was all set. I'd taken pictures of the street so I could talk about road surface conditions. I has a copy of the Washington State Traffic Safety Commission pamphlet wherein it says not to take your hands off the bars if it was unsafe. I'd exercised my right to discovery and I'd subpoenaed the officer. I was ready and willing to make my case before the judge.

The officer didn't show up. Case dismissed.

I've got to admit I've got mixed feelings here. On the one hand, I'm happy that I don't have to pay a fine any my record continues clean. On the other hand, though, I was rather looking forward to getting a formal ruling on not removing my hands from the bars to signal the turn. The charge about not riding closely enough to the right side of the road was completely bogus and I didn't have any concerns about it at all, but it would have been nice to have a precedent that you, I, and anyone else could use in defense against a Failure To Signal charge. Maybe next time .

I'd like to thank Jim (sorry, I don't know your last name) for showing up. Jim and I often meet up during one part of the other of the commute, and it was nice to have someone there.
unixpro is offline  
Old 10-08-09, 07:38 PM
  #2  
Richly Poor!
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NW USA
Posts: 26

Bikes: ICE

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
unixpro - Good news is good news! Maybe next time you'll get em!!!
Mt_Top is offline  
Old 10-08-09, 08:27 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
BengeBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Posts: 6,955

Bikes: 2009 Chris Boedeker custom; 2007 Bill Davidson custom; 2021 Bill Davidson custom gravel bike; 2022 Specialized Turbo Vado e-bike

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Thanks for the update - I've heard this is often the outcome. I hope they fix the road surface.
BengeBoy is offline  
Old 10-21-09, 03:53 PM
  #4  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by unixpro
... but it would have been nice to have a precedent that you, I, and anyone else could use in defense against a Failure To Signal charge. Maybe next time .
Traffic court rulings do not set a precedent. You would have had to be found guilty and then appealed that to a higher court and then won the appeal based on the law being improper.
CB HI is offline  
Old 10-21-09, 04:00 PM
  #5  
aka Phil Jungels
 
Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Aurora, IL
Posts: 8,234

Bikes: 08 Specialized Crosstrail Sport, 05 Sirrus Comp

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 202 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times in 60 Posts
Shouldn't the cop get a contempt of court for failure to show - he was served!

Maybe time to register a complaint with the chief of police, and the police commission....
Wanderer is offline  
Old 10-27-09, 01:31 PM
  #6  
.
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 3,981

Bikes: Specialized Roubaix Comp, Soma ES

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
no, cops don't have to show up to court. He wasn't served.

Also, IL isn't in the PNW.
__________________
Demented internet tail wagging imbicile.
knobster is offline  
Old 10-27-09, 02:54 PM
  #7  
Laid back bent rider
Thread Starter
 
unixpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Burien, WA
Posts: 1,134

Bikes: Bacchetta Giro 20

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The cop was subpoenaed and served in a timely manner. There is a form you fill out and submit to the clerk of the court if you want to subpoena the cop. There's another, different form you fill out and file with the office of the City Prosecutor if you want Discovery.

The prosecutor, when I went up to the defendants table, stood and told the judge that I had, in fact, subpoenaed the officer to appear, that the subpoena was submitted in accordance with the law and filed in a timely manner, and that she had received no communication from the officer indicating that he would not be present. Because the city was unable to produce their witness, she would not object to a motion from the defense (me) to dismiss. All I had to do was say "Yes, please" to the judge at that point.
unixpro is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.