Can Lance still call himself 7x TDF champ?
#126
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Brentwood WLA
Posts: 326
Bikes: 50/34, 11-40, 11 Speed
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 142 Post(s)
Liked 73 Times
in
52 Posts
He can call himself the Queen of Sheba, I guess. Few are likely to recognize him as such.
Saying that he made people mad because they couldn't stand his success is preposterous.
Other cyclists who doped came forward and admitted it, had suspensions, and were restored.
Lance spend millions in attack lawyers to try to obstruct legitimate investigation and destroy the people conducting it.
They had every right to be pissed. They came down on him like a ton of bricks, which is generally what happens when people respond to an investigation by being Epic Colossal Aholes.
If he had a shred of integrity, he could have come forward and admitted what he did, cooperated with the investigators, and taken his suspension like lots of other cyclists did.
Your melodrama about poor persecuted Lance is not going to play very well with any but the most delusional Lance Fans.
Saying that he made people mad because they couldn't stand his success is preposterous.
Other cyclists who doped came forward and admitted it, had suspensions, and were restored.
Lance spend millions in attack lawyers to try to obstruct legitimate investigation and destroy the people conducting it.
They had every right to be pissed. They came down on him like a ton of bricks, which is generally what happens when people respond to an investigation by being Epic Colossal Aholes.
If he had a shred of integrity, he could have come forward and admitted what he did, cooperated with the investigators, and taken his suspension like lots of other cyclists did.
Your melodrama about poor persecuted Lance is not going to play very well with any but the most delusional Lance Fans.
Obviously we disagree both on some of the issues and also where we share common ground are perspectives vary on the intensity or seriousness of the issues.
As a side note I don't think you will find too many cyclists or other athletes that having not failed a drug test freely confessed, were suspended, and were restored in that order.
One thing that I think all reasonable and prudent people, ( I think you are likely such a person), can agree on IMO, is that Armstrong is for a variety of reasons an incredibly polarizing topic as to what or who he is and what he did or did not do.
#127
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Brentwood WLA
Posts: 326
Bikes: 50/34, 11-40, 11 Speed
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 142 Post(s)
Liked 73 Times
in
52 Posts
No, he was stripped of his titles because he doped and after investigation found he doped he admitted it. That is why he had his titles stripped.
The lawsuit, him losing sponsorship, people hating him, people pushing investigation of him and his doping scheme, ect...that is because he was a total ass.
The lawsuit, him losing sponsorship, people hating him, people pushing investigation of him and his doping scheme, ect...that is because he was a total ass.
Upon reaching their conclusion, the pro-active plaintiffs or the prosecution which is what the USADA were then gave Armstrong the "opportunity" to offer whatever defense or rebuttal he wanted. Armstrong declined citing that the burden to continue the fight against the USADA would be too great upon himself and his family at that stage in his life. The USADA then declared themselves the winner by default and banned him. Then after all of that Armstrong publicly admitted he doped. Those are the facts.
Remember, Armstrong was punished solely at the official and athletic jurisdictional level for doping and helping or encouraging doping by others. (All based upon the USADA's investigation and ruling.) It was only after that most of his legal troubles loss of sponsors or financial penalties came up in response.
So some of the questions or issues that need to be answered to their satisfaction for those interested in the topic at an in depth level are:
1. Did Armstrong Dope?
2. Did he encourage or pressure others to dope?
3. Was he investigated or prosecuted in a fair and equal process at the same level of all or anyone else in cycling?
4. Was he punished for matters unrelated to doping?
5. Did the punishment fit the crime?
I submit that for me as an individual the answers to one and two are definitely yes.
The answers to the other questions are clear to me but rather than expound I will simply say each person can make their own decision about that.
In conclusion, as stated in another post, Armstrong is unquestionably an incredibly perhaps even an unequalled polarizing individual or topic in the context of the issue/issues being discussed. So much so that he and the facts or opinions transcend the single field of cycling or sports in general.
Regardless, what's done is done. My thanks to each of the posters that responded to my posts on Armstrong. We all share the common bond of the love of cycling. That's a good thing. I think we all can agree about that!
#128
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 496
Bikes: Volagi Viaje (rando/gravel/tour), Cannondale Slice 4 (tri/TT), Motobecane Fantom PLUS X9 (plus tires MTB)
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 97 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Lots of claims or allegations in your eloquent post. (It is eloquent.) Also a lot of emotion.
Obviously we disagree both on some of the issues and also where we share common ground are perspectives vary on the intensity or seriousness of the issues.
As a side note I don't think you will find too many cyclists or other athletes that having not failed a drug test freely confessed, were suspended, and were restored in that order.
One thing that I think all reasonable and prudent people, ( I think you are likely such a person), can agree on IMO, is that Armstrong is for a variety of reasons an incredibly polarizing topic as to what or who he is and what he did or did not do.
Obviously we disagree both on some of the issues and also where we share common ground are perspectives vary on the intensity or seriousness of the issues.
As a side note I don't think you will find too many cyclists or other athletes that having not failed a drug test freely confessed, were suspended, and were restored in that order.
One thing that I think all reasonable and prudent people, ( I think you are likely such a person), can agree on IMO, is that Armstrong is for a variety of reasons an incredibly polarizing topic as to what or who he is and what he did or did not do.
I absolutely abhor a bully, and have solid longstanding reasons for doing so. To me, there is really no other accomplishment that can make up for abusing people who are not in a position to fight back. It's not the unforgivable sin (don't believe in those), but a little bit of humility and repentance goes a long way in that direction. From this distance, I've seen a lot more on the bullying side and essentially no believable humility or repentance from Lance.
As to another of your posts, "investigated fairly and equally" - it's a pretty well established dynamic that people who show contempt for legitimate investigations by legitimate authorities are going to get the book thrown at them. Not a tax lawyer, but my understanding is that Martha Stewart's original offense was relatively minor, but she and/or her team were so hostile/recalcitrant/contemptuous toward the IRS that they escalated their trouble way beyond the original offense. In such a case, I do not put all of the blame on the investigating body. To some extent, it is normal and natural that a cooperative individual who respects the process will be treated differently than someone who responds with arrogance, hostility, and contempt. The appearance to me is that Lance was very accustomed to being able to bully, bluster, and intimidate his way out of any problem, and finally ran up against a problem that willing and able to fight back. Very difficult for me to muster bargeloads of sympathy for Lance in this situation.
I do appreciate your ability to disagree in civil way and to the extent I have not reciprocated that I apologize.
Last edited by alathIN; 01-01-16 at 06:13 AM.
#129
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,624
Bikes: iele Latina, Miele Suprema, Miele Uno LS, Miele Miele Beta, MMTB, Bianchi Model Unknown, Fiori Venezia, Fiori Napoli, VeloSport Adamas AX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1324 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
640 Posts
Armstrong was stripped of his TdeF wins.
What really irked me about the man wasn't his doping or even his denial of doping; no, it was his malicious and vengeful attacks verbally and financially (he ruined many people) against those who during his career were saying that he was doping. That's what turned me off ever respecting either the man or his accomplishments.
His famous quote, "it's not about the bike..." should have been, "It's not about the bike. It's about the dope and not getting caught".
I always figured if he was indeed doping then anyone who was able to keep reasonably close to him must have been doping too.
After all, the reality is not, "It doesn't matter if you win or lose it's how you play the game" it's, "It doesn't matter how you play the game. It matters wheter you win or lose". You don't get major sponsors or big bucks by losing.
Cheers
What really irked me about the man wasn't his doping or even his denial of doping; no, it was his malicious and vengeful attacks verbally and financially (he ruined many people) against those who during his career were saying that he was doping. That's what turned me off ever respecting either the man or his accomplishments.
His famous quote, "it's not about the bike..." should have been, "It's not about the bike. It's about the dope and not getting caught".
I always figured if he was indeed doping then anyone who was able to keep reasonably close to him must have been doping too.
After all, the reality is not, "It doesn't matter if you win or lose it's how you play the game" it's, "It doesn't matter how you play the game. It matters wheter you win or lose". You don't get major sponsors or big bucks by losing.
Cheers
#131
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Posts: 2,318
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
FWIW, Lance wasn't the only member of Postal who lost results as a result of USADA's investigation. Levi Leipheimer lost all of his from 1999-2006 and another set in 2007, including his third place finish at a Vuelta early on and at the 2007 Tour. He also lost a stage win from that Tour. All of the major Postal riders lost some results---Leipheimer was the hardest hit after Lance.
Hincapie also lost several stage wins from various Tours, too. As did Dave Zabriskie. I think he lost some stage wins from the Giro and Vuelta, too???
Hincapie also lost several stage wins from various Tours, too. As did Dave Zabriskie. I think he lost some stage wins from the Giro and Vuelta, too???
#132
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlantic Beach Florida
Posts: 1,945
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3773 Post(s)
Liked 1,044 Times
in
790 Posts
This is a 17-y/o Lance Armstrong. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUBTDIiKBNA
I'm not going to defend LA's actions during the winning years of the TdF, they were horrible, but he was a great athlete.
I'm not going to defend LA's actions during the winning years of the TdF, they were horrible, but he was a great athlete.
#133
Bicyclerider4life
What gets me, is that his biggest accuser, a Mr. Greg LeMond, if memory serves, claims that he (Mr. LeMond) "was the last clean TDF winner ..."
I find this most interesting. If memory serves, during Mr. LeMond's era, the entire peloton "suffered from asthma", including Mr. LeMond. I remember Mr. LeMond and the other top riders, openly taking a hit off their inhalers, during a race; especially during the mountain stages and time trials.
IMHO (which I will be the first to admit means nothing) Mr. LeMond was just as "dirty" as the next guy in the peloton, before, during, and after his era.
I wonder how Mr. Greg LeMond's (and the rest of the top riders during his day) "asthma" is affecting him these days. Does he still "need" his inhaler, or has he "outgrown" the asthma?
Also, "if" Mr. Armstrong was "dirty", why didn't any of the post race drug tests come back "FAILED"?
I did not want to think Mr. Armstrong was drugging. However, if you think about it, he had to be. The testicular cancer had spread to his lungs. At the very least, that would cause scar tissue in his lungs (just like pneumonia does), That is damage that does not go away - ever.
As far as I am concerned, the governing body's lost all credibility when they declared "NO ONE" won the 7 TDF's that Lance was being stripped of his wins. Normal procedure is to reward the win to the next rider down. However, in this case, the next rider down, had been convicted of doping ... and so on and so on and so on, presumably down to the last person to cross the finish line in the allotted time to finish the race. This being the case, that the entire peloton was drugging, Armstrong's wins should not have been taken away. Since everyone was dirty, it was still a "level" playing field.
Pro cycling was the last sport I followed. I do not follow any sport now. Baseball, Football, Basketball, Hockey, all discredited by drugging. Tennis and golf put me to sleep. I quit watching "pro wrestling" 50 years ago. nothing but a bunch of bad actors in that one. The "win" is decided before anyone steps into the ring. Their dancing moves are practiced before the "match" ...
I find this most interesting. If memory serves, during Mr. LeMond's era, the entire peloton "suffered from asthma", including Mr. LeMond. I remember Mr. LeMond and the other top riders, openly taking a hit off their inhalers, during a race; especially during the mountain stages and time trials.
IMHO (which I will be the first to admit means nothing) Mr. LeMond was just as "dirty" as the next guy in the peloton, before, during, and after his era.
I wonder how Mr. Greg LeMond's (and the rest of the top riders during his day) "asthma" is affecting him these days. Does he still "need" his inhaler, or has he "outgrown" the asthma?
Also, "if" Mr. Armstrong was "dirty", why didn't any of the post race drug tests come back "FAILED"?
I did not want to think Mr. Armstrong was drugging. However, if you think about it, he had to be. The testicular cancer had spread to his lungs. At the very least, that would cause scar tissue in his lungs (just like pneumonia does), That is damage that does not go away - ever.
As far as I am concerned, the governing body's lost all credibility when they declared "NO ONE" won the 7 TDF's that Lance was being stripped of his wins. Normal procedure is to reward the win to the next rider down. However, in this case, the next rider down, had been convicted of doping ... and so on and so on and so on, presumably down to the last person to cross the finish line in the allotted time to finish the race. This being the case, that the entire peloton was drugging, Armstrong's wins should not have been taken away. Since everyone was dirty, it was still a "level" playing field.
Pro cycling was the last sport I followed. I do not follow any sport now. Baseball, Football, Basketball, Hockey, all discredited by drugging. Tennis and golf put me to sleep. I quit watching "pro wrestling" 50 years ago. nothing but a bunch of bad actors in that one. The "win" is decided before anyone steps into the ring. Their dancing moves are practiced before the "match" ...
__________________
"Whenever I see an adult riding a bicycle, I know there is hope for mankind." (H. G. Wells)
"Whenever I see an adult riding a bicycle, I know there is hope for mankind." (H. G. Wells)
#134
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,522
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1422 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
5 Posts
When you have two balls, you have to constantly adjust your package to keep it from getting smashed while riding.
Lance only had to adjust HALF AS OFTEN!!!
#135
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 496
Bikes: Volagi Viaje (rando/gravel/tour), Cannondale Slice 4 (tri/TT), Motobecane Fantom PLUS X9 (plus tires MTB)
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 97 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
As far as I am concerned, the governing body's lost all credibility when they declared "NO ONE" won the 7 TDF's that Lance was being stripped of his wins. Normal procedure is to reward the win to the next rider down. However, in this case, the next rider down, had been convicted of doping ... and so on and so on and so on, presumably down to the last person to cross the finish line in the allotted time to finish the race. This being the case, that the entire peloton was drugging, Armstrong's wins should not have been taken away. Since everyone was dirty, it was still a "level" playing field.
...
...
If everyone in the next Olympics high jump used a ladder to get over the bar, then I'd say nobody actually did the high jump as called for by the rules and nobody gets a medal.
#136
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 63
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Not sure if I agree with that. If the rule says that such-and-such an action disqualifies the rider, and everyone does that action, then nobody qualifies for the win.
If everyone in the next Olympics high jump used a ladder to get over the bar, then I'd say nobody actually did the high jump as called for by the rules and nobody gets a medal.
If everyone in the next Olympics high jump used a ladder to get over the bar, then I'd say nobody actually did the high jump as called for by the rules and nobody gets a medal.
#137
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: D'uh... I am a Cutter
Posts: 6,139
Bikes: '17 Access Old Turnpike Gravel bike, '14 Trek 1.1, '13 Cannondale CAAD 10, '98 CAD 2, R300
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1571 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
9 Posts
Bicycle racing has a long and rich history of doping. Lance is by every measure... a "traditional cycling champion".
#138
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,905
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times
in
2,553 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TheManShow
General Cycling Discussion
8
07-16-15 06:40 AM