Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hamilton (Formerly Toronto)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Wow. The author of that article is obviously not only NOT a cycling fan, but has likely never watched a race.
The article talked about how the Tour is BORING and explained the reign of Miguel Indurain as this:
....won every Tour de France from 1991 to 1995 without ever attacking. While his opponents raced up the mountains (the fools!), Indurain simply kept them within sight and then slaughtered them in the time trials.
This FOOL has obviously never seen any of Indurain's races.
The author compared last year's tour to this explanation of Indurain...Did the author see Lance in the Mountains? (could have one another if he hadn't let Basso take that one Mountain stage)..
The author then complains that there aren't enough finishes on climbs and says that it doesn't matter because the FRENCH Mountains aren't that steep anyways! This guy has probably never even rode a hill as steep as a parking garage!
This guy must have been late on a deadline or something becuase this article is very biased, incorrect on several accounts and uninformed on almost all accounts.
The only thing I thought was possibly true in this, was that he mentioned that if somebody BEATS Lance this year, it would be better for the sport than if Lance wins, and retires...I think Lance will win, and honestly hope he does too. But I do think that if someone dethrones him, it would hype the sport more.
I don't even know the point of this article. 10 years ago you would NEVER see even a news report on the Tour in North America. Now, it is the most popular sporting event of the summer, and OLN basically covers nothing but the tour for 3 solid weeks.
10years ago most non-cyclists couldn't tell you the name of a cyclist. Now everyone knows who Lance is, and because of that MANY new fans and loads of new enthusiasts and racers have emerged.
Last edited by Bikeophile; 07-01-05 at 06:32 PM.