What is Gonchars' cadence?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: "Gosh honey, you pass more like Tony Rominger..."
Posts: 3,218
Bikes: 2005 Scott CR1 Pro - 1992 Panasonix Fixed Conversion 60tx20t
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
What is Gonchars' cadence?
Man, that Russky makes Ullrich look like a spinner. Maybe 70 rpm?
Wonder what top gear he used in the TDF TT today?
Wonder what top gear he used in the TDF TT today?
__________________
"How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"
"How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"
#2
Rubber Side Down
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 244
Bikes: 2005 Felt B2 TT Bike, 2005 Trek 2100, 2001 Fuji Finest AL
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I saw a shot from the motorcycle where he looked to be in the 53 (myabe even a 54) and either the 11 or 12. Im pretty sure this was on one of the flatter sections.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: "Gosh honey, you pass more like Tony Rominger..."
Posts: 3,218
Bikes: 2005 Scott CR1 Pro - 1992 Panasonix Fixed Conversion 60tx20t
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by jrennie
55x11
__________________
"How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"
"How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"
#5
Aut Vincere Aut Mori
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 4,166
Bikes: Irish Cycles Tir na Nog, Jack Kane Team Racing, Fuji Aloha 1.0, GT Karakoram, Motobecane Fly Team
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by botto
his cadence was something like 17-22 rpms. typical of most BF memebers
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: "Gosh honey, you pass more like Tony Rominger..."
Posts: 3,218
Bikes: 2005 Scott CR1 Pro - 1992 Panasonix Fixed Conversion 60tx20t
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Otay
__________________
"How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"
"How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the middle of horse country, in The Garden State
Posts: 3,159
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What cadence are most of the TdF pros using for the individual TT's? Is there a wide range of cadences or do they tend to be on the lower side?
#8
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,271
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1426 Post(s)
Liked 692 Times
in
351 Posts
Originally Posted by Snicklefritz
What cadence are most of the TdF pros using for the individual TT's? Is there a wide range of cadences or do they tend to be on the lower side?
#9
Let's Go!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 743
Bikes: 2005 Trek 1500
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by Sincitycycler
Man, that Russky makes Ullrich look like a spinner. Maybe 70 rpm?
Wonder what top gear he used in the TDF TT today?
Wonder what top gear he used in the TDF TT today?
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the middle of horse country, in The Garden State
Posts: 3,159
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
I would bet the majority are riding 90-100 rpm. For a while when Indurain was very successfull TT'ing with a lower cadence (around 80) there was a trend to TTing at a lower cadence than you'd ride in a RR or a crit. Then with Armstrong's success at 100+, the trend was high cadence. I doubt many spin as fast as Armstrong, but his success had the effect of more riders ridingat a higher candence, and more coaches coaching riders to ride a higher cadence. My CTS coach wants my TT cadence at 100 rpm. or at least in the 90's, and I think that's the currently prevailing school of thought.
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
Originally Posted by Snicklefritz
that's what I've heard too - I've been trying to ride at a higher cadence 95+ rpm which is a lot easier now than it used to be and I'm trying for 100-105 for shorter durations. However, when I do work in the tempo zone at 100-105 rpm it drives my HR up. However, my legs end up being fresher. If I ride at A lower cadence, my HR stays down, but my legs tend to get a bit more tired. So where do you draw the line? I've heard people say if you pedal at a higher cadence it can help you avoid early onset of lactic acid accumulation, but if high cadence tends to drive your HR up, then isn't that making you tired too?
#12
Banned
@snicklefritz, most people have alot more reserve cardio capacity, in other words, by working your heart and cardio system a little harder you spare your legs which will get tired first all else being equal, and most people being rookies definitely dont have the reserve leg power. Their legs burn under high efforts and get torn up by even one hard short ride. You can mitigate much of that by spinning faster and easier, usually at the expense of speed.
The reasoning behind the spin fast like Lance craze started because post cancer Armstrong had to rebuild almost his entire musclelature, so he didnt have the powerful legs of the past, but he did have the cardio power he always had. Dr Ferrari observed the fast gate of kenyan marathoners and made the intuitive guess they were doing the same, shift more of the load to your heart and off your legs, turned Armstrong onto it..........and so it was born. Now rec riders everywhere attempt to emulate it.
The reasoning behind the spin fast like Lance craze started because post cancer Armstrong had to rebuild almost his entire musclelature, so he didnt have the powerful legs of the past, but he did have the cardio power he always had. Dr Ferrari observed the fast gate of kenyan marathoners and made the intuitive guess they were doing the same, shift more of the load to your heart and off your legs, turned Armstrong onto it..........and so it was born. Now rec riders everywhere attempt to emulate it.
#13
Used to be a climber..
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 6,849
Bikes: 2016 Ridley Fenix SL, 2020 Trek Emonda ALR (rim brake)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
I've been spinning since 1990....same theory applied back then as it does now. Oddly enough though, lately (last 6 months or so) my cadence has dropped a bit.
#15
Now Racer Ex
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,709
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Snicklefritz
that's what I've heard too - I've been trying to ride at a higher cadence 95+ rpm which is a lot easier now than it used to be and I'm trying for 100-105 for shorter durations. However, when I do work in the tempo zone at 100-105 rpm it drives my HR up. However, my legs end up being fresher. If I ride at A lower cadence, my HR stays down, but my legs tend to get a bit more tired. So where do you draw the line? I've heard people say if you pedal at a higher cadence it can help you avoid early onset of lactic acid accumulation, but if high cadence tends to drive your HR up, then isn't that making you tired too?
I finally got my dedicated TT bike with the SRM going, and raced it for the first time at Districts. I found that as my cadence dropped off, so would my watts, kind of a direct line on the graph. I've also played around on a Computrainer tracking pedal stroke. Higher cadence sort of forces you to smooth out the stroke, so you get a more uniform application of power.
High cadence is also usefull in sprints, two of the best Cat 1 riders I know typically spin out at over 120. Seems to work for the little Aussie too.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In the middle of horse country, in The Garden State
Posts: 3,159
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Vinokurtov
Muscle tends to recover much slower than your cardio. Getting your body used to higher cadence takes time, sometimes a year or more. In the long run it's less loading on the muscles and much easier on the knees, but it does depend on muscle type to be really effective. You can recruit fast twitch fibers, but if your starting off with predominantly slow twitch you won't make it.
I finally got my dedicated TT bike with the SRM going, and raced it for the first time at Districts. I found that as my cadence dropped off, so would my watts, kind of a direct line on the graph. I've also played around on a Computrainer tracking pedal stroke. Higher cadence sort of forces you to smooth out the stroke, so you get a more uniform application of power.
High cadence is also usefull in sprints, two of the best Cat 1 riders I know typically spin out at over 120. Seems to work for the little Aussie too.
I finally got my dedicated TT bike with the SRM going, and raced it for the first time at Districts. I found that as my cadence dropped off, so would my watts, kind of a direct line on the graph. I've also played around on a Computrainer tracking pedal stroke. Higher cadence sort of forces you to smooth out the stroke, so you get a more uniform application of power.
High cadence is also usefull in sprints, two of the best Cat 1 riders I know typically spin out at over 120. Seems to work for the little Aussie too.
When doing TT intervals of 6-15' duration, I tend to start off at a higher cadence, like ~95rpm or so, but go lower (85-90rpm) for subsequent intervals when my legs start to feel tired, but my watts go up! It seemed to be particularly noticeable on my TT workout today. weird. So does this sort of thing imply a certain muscle type? Or does having decent sized quads (for more leverege as opposed to bird legs) have something to do with it? I've noticed a similar thing on hills. I generate more power at 70 rpm as opposed to 80+ although I can still ride at that cadence...
#18
Banned
your watts go up because you cant generate enough torque at higher cadences, this is quite normal and lost on lots of people it seems........Ive seen guys insist on nothing but 100+ rpms then all of sudden find themselves unable to go much faster than 20-22mph LOL and wonder why--------use a lower cadence or spend 5 years riding 10k+ per year training at a higher one to get the speed back, thats what it boils down to, high cadence takes years and tons of miles to train your body to generate the power at those higher rpm's, its a waste with novices
if your legs are getting tired from even short runs at 80 rpm or so, get some base mileage
if your legs are getting tired from even short runs at 80 rpm or so, get some base mileage