Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Professional Cycling For the Fans
Reload this Page >

NOW do you think Floyd doped?

Search
Notices
Professional Cycling For the Fans Follow the Tour de France,the Giro de Italia, the Spring Classics, or other professional cycling races? Here's your home...
View Poll Results: NOW do you think Floyd doped?
Yes, I believe he doped/cheated in this year's Tour.
115
64.61%
No, I believe he's clean and there is some explanation other than his cheating for the test results.
63
35.39%
Voters: 178. You may not vote on this poll

NOW do you think Floyd doped?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-06, 07:28 PM
  #1  
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Helmet Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
NOW do you think Floyd doped?

So, NOW do you think Floyd doped?
Helmet Head is offline  
Old 08-01-06, 07:32 PM
  #2  
Go Titans!!
 
sunninho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Culver City, CA
Posts: 2,489

Bikes: '04 Eddy Merckx Team SC - Record - Rolf Prima Vigor; Andy Hampsten Cinghiale - Dura Ace 7800 - Rolf Elan Aero

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
NOW that I voted, his Sample B better come back positive this weekend
__________________
One must live the way one thinks or end up thinking the way one has lived.
--Paul Bourget
sunninho is offline  
Old 08-01-06, 09:30 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Raedeke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 290

Bikes: '89-Trek 2120 '04-Cannondale Hybrid '05-Specialized Roubaix Comp '89 Burley Tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My vote is that he didn't.
The testing practices are not being done in anonymity and I'm leaning on the idea of the French Connection.

The knew which was Floyd's sample, added their own version of Vive La France...AKA Synthetic Testosterone and Viola...."no more American winning our race"

Frankly, I wouldn't put it past them. And in reality someone needs to review the testing practices as much as they need to review the doping practices.

If Floyd goes down, and we then find that there are major discrepancies in the way the Tour testing is done, I'm saying it's probably going to make it 100, but it will never be the same race on the same scale again.

In the end they may say that Floyd is guilty. But unless they can also prove that the testing was done in such a way that it's not possible for there to have been any foul play against him.. then it's all political as Oscar said. And such a shame and sham it will be...
Raedeke is offline  
Old 08-01-06, 10:03 PM
  #4  
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Helmet Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Why on Earth would anyone in the French lab care about whether Floyd won the Tour enough to risk his career and freedom (probably would get prison for this) by intentionally putting some artificial testosterone in Floyd's samples just so some ex-Phonak Spanish guy could win the Tour instead of the American Phonak guy?

Isn't it much more likely that Floyd is just as guilty as Tyler Hamilton and the 2, 3, and #4 finishers from last year are likely to be shown to be after the Spanish scandal is resolved?
Helmet Head is offline  
Old 08-01-06, 10:17 PM
  #5  
Mad scientist w/a wrench
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chucktown
Posts: 760

Bikes: none working atm

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
how about an option for "I'm still waiting on the b results" because I am.

IRMS probably is just about as bombproof of a test as is available for this sort of thing, but redundancy in testing is just good practice and I don't think anything should have been said about this without both being tested by two independent labs in as anonymous a fashion as possible, preferably with some kind of blind procedures being run.

if he is guilty, I think he should be subjected to public humiliation via matt stone and trey parker of southpark along with Ulrich and the others, just as they did to a few doping baseball players one episode.
krazygluon is offline  
Old 08-01-06, 10:21 PM
  #6  
semifreddo amartuerer
 
'nother's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 4,599

Bikes: several

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
Why on Earth would anyone in the French lab care about whether Floyd won the Tour enough to risk his career and freedom (probably would get prison for this) by intentionally putting some artificial testosterone in Floyd's samples just so some ex-Phonak Spanish guy could win the Tour instead of the American Phonak guy?

Isn't it much more likely that Floyd is just as guilty as Tyler Hamilton and the 2, 3, and #4 finishers from last year are likely to be shown to be after the Spanish scandal is resolved?
I agree, this "French Connection" business is a bit far-fetched. It's about like explaining to a police officer about to give you a ticket for speeding that some Unknown Bad Person tampered with your speedometer in a way that caused you to be able to go 80 in a 55 zone without noticing.

My heart wants to believe Floyd but my brain is saying, "the simplest explanation is usually the best" and considering the defeat in stage 16 and the amazing comeback in stage 17 and the coincidence of a (apparently) positive test for exogenous testosterone on the day of stage 17 that seems pretty simple. A lot simpler than some crazy conspiracy theories about "the French".

I'll reserve judgement on the matter until the authorities have made their own judgement, but It's hard to deny that the dark clouds are gathering pretty heavily over Mr. Landis right about now.
'nother is offline  
Old 08-02-06, 04:52 AM
  #7  
My toilet-Floyd's future
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,776
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
how about an option for "I'm still waiting on the b results" because I am.
Yeah, and I still have a dollar on a 40,000/1 bet. Keeping my fingers crossed!!
__________________
EURO is offline  
Old 08-02-06, 05:32 AM
  #8  
HWS
Fuji Shill
 
HWS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Gilmanton Iron Works, NH
Posts: 1,230

Bikes: Fuji Roubaix

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm sitting on the fence, my "Floyds a cheat" side balanced by blind faith.

I am curious as to why the details of the A sample are being leaked out so slowly instead of everything coming out at once last week.
__________________
HWS is offline  
Old 08-02-06, 07:11 AM
  #9  
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,303

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times in 372 Posts
Now that I've learned I have to share my TDF prediction title if Landis is positive, I have thought this over, and it is clear that Landis is the victim of a french conspiracy, the sample must have been altered, he naturaly produces a high level of testosterone, the results were thrown off by alcohol and dehydration, the isotope test is invalid, he was the victim of a spiked waterbottle, and/or his massuese rubbed "the clear" into his thigh without his knowledge.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 08-02-06, 10:19 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Trevor98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 1,038
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am more interested in the results from the A sample that will be released after the B sample testing. The leaks and rumors are annoying.
Trevor98 is offline  
Old 08-02-06, 10:44 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 736
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Raedeke
My vote is that he didn't.
The testing practices are not being done in anonymity and I'm leaning on the idea of the French Connection.

The knew which was Floyd's sample, added their own version of Vive La France...AKA Synthetic Testosterone and Viola...."no more American winning our race"

...

In the end they may say that Floyd is guilty. But unless they can also prove that the testing was done in such a way that it's not possible for there to have been any foul play against him.. then it's all political as Oscar said. And such a shame and sham it will be...
Yeah - let's trick it, so that a -oops - Spaniard can win. Damn. Ok, let's find something on the Spaniard, so that a - German can win. Damn. Ok, let's find... 6 of them have to be thrown out before you can finally get a Frenchman on top of the podium. Good theory.

If some time was spent looking at *all* the riders that receive doping sanctions in a year, instead of only Americans, one could see that Americans represent but a small fraction of all sanctions. But of course, if a tree falls in the forest and nobody's there to hear it, it makes no sound; and if anything happens to a non-American outside the US, it does not happen.

It's "voilà", not "viola" - unless you're into chamber music, of course.
Zouf is offline  
Old 08-02-06, 11:12 AM
  #12  
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Helmet Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trevor98
I am more interested in the results from the A sample that will be released after the B sample testing. The leaks and rumors are annoying.
Take it up with Floyd, his team and his doctor, since that's who leaked:
  1. that it was Floyd who failed a doping test
  2. that his T/E ratio in the A sample was 11:1
  3. that they expect the same results for the B sample
  4. that he would ask for the B sample test on Friday
  5. that he asked for the B sample test not until Monday (coincidentally only after the UCI asked for it too)

The only relevant leak that did not come from them was that the lab found artificial testosterone in the A sample.
Helmet Head is offline  
Old 08-02-06, 11:27 AM
  #13  
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,303

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times in 372 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
The only relevant leak that did not come from them was that the lab found artificial testosterone in the A sample.
and Landis' personal physician confirmed that information
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 08-02-06, 11:45 AM
  #14  
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Helmet Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
and Landis' personal physician confirmed that information
I missed that. First, l"Equipe reported it. Then the NY Times. But I never heard about a confirmation from Landis' doctor.
Got a link?
Helmet Head is offline  
Old 08-02-06, 11:46 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Trevor98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 1,038
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Why is a physician commenting on a patient?
Trevor98 is offline  
Old 08-02-06, 11:47 AM
  #16  
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Helmet Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trevor98
Why is a physician commenting on a patient?
Because, out of desperation, the patient is asking him too.
Also, it may be that the physician is the one who screwed up the calculation on how much steroid to administer.
Helmet Head is offline  
Old 08-02-06, 12:03 PM
  #17  
1. e4 Nf6
 
Alekhine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 78º44`W, 42º46`N
Posts: 871

Bikes: Mercian KoM with Rohloff, Bike Friday NWT, Pogliaghi Italcorse (1979)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Zouf
Yeah - let's trick it, so that a -oops - Spaniard can win. Damn. Ok, let's find something on the Spaniard, so that a - German can win. Damn. Ok, let's find... 6 of them have to be thrown out before you can finally get a Frenchman on top of the podium. Good theory.
I think most of the "French conspiracy theory" types are under the impression that 'the French' hate Americans as much as Americans apparently hate 'the French' and couldn't give a damn that it went to a Spaniard or a German or a Fijian or a Martian, as long as it didn't go to another American. Don't quote me on that though - it's just the vibe I've been getting locally about it.

"Those French bastards hate America and everything it stands for! They'd do anything to make sweet, honest, Christian mennonite Floyd seem like the devil!"
Alekhine is offline  
Old 08-02-06, 12:05 PM
  #18  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 27
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I seriously doubt an American doctor with a decent regular practice--as Floyd's doctor does-- would involve himself in doping for the reason that the California Licensing Board is very tough, for a variety of reasons, and I feel fairly sure the guy could lose his license or get suspended. Testosterone in this country is a controlled substance, because of the likelihood of abuse, so you could also fall afoul of the DEA, who gives doctors their rights to prescribe controlled substances. And if there is one thing I can assure you of, you do not want to mess with hte DEA.

Sometimes even respected pain specialists have issues with the DEA for prescribing large volumes of controlled substances, but thos guys document everything very very carefully so there is no funny business.

So Floyds doc may be a good guy taken in by someone doing something not so great. I believe that to be the most likely scenario
hombredebicycle is offline  
Old 08-02-06, 12:31 PM
  #19  
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,303

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times in 372 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
I missed that. First, l"Equipe reported it. Then the NY Times. But I never heard about a confirmation from Landis' doctor.
Got a link?
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/01/sp...rtner=homepage
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 08-02-06, 12:36 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Trevor98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 1,038
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
Because, out of desperation, the patient is asking him too.
Also, it may be that the physician is the one who screwed up the calculation on how much steroid to administer.

Dr. Brent Kay is an American doctor and cannot comment upon the case without the patients approval (or chance a ethics board and lawsuits). Commenting upon the case either happened a) illegally b) with Landis' approval (still questionable ethically) or c) it didn't happen- the only three possibilities. I would like to know which one. I hope, for the doctors sake, rather than Landis' that he confirmed the leak with permission (Landis is thus done for).
Trevor98 is offline  
Old 08-02-06, 12:48 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Karlotta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 206
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trevor98
b) with Landis' approval (still questionable ethically) .

Explain the ethical question involved.
__________________
PLAY TRUE - https://www.wada-ama.org
Karlotta is offline  
Old 08-02-06, 12:50 PM
  #22  
<><
 
SoonerBent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 768

Bikes: RANS Tailwind

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I'm starting to have serious doubts. I hate to think that a rider would be stupid enough to take something that, according to almost everything I've read, doesn't provide instant performance enhancement. Then be even more stupid and win the stage knowing that he'll be tested. But I'm beginning to think that's what happened.

Originally Posted by Helmet Head
Take it up with Floyd, his team and his doctor, since that's who leaked:
  1. that it was Floyd who failed a doping test
  2. that his T/E ratio in the A sample was 11:1
  3. that they expect the same results for the B sample
  4. that he would ask for the B sample test on Friday
  5. that he asked for the B sample test not until Monday (coincidentally only after the UCI asked for it too)
Those weren't leaks. They were public statements from known sources. I have to agree with Trevor98 that I'm sick of the leaks from anonymous sources.

SB
SoonerBent is offline  
Old 08-02-06, 12:53 PM
  #23  
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So far they have all been confirmed by the Landis' people in this case so I don't see the problem.
dutret is offline  
Old 08-02-06, 12:57 PM
  #24  
Banned.
Thread Starter
 
Helmet Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trevor98
Dr. Brent Kay is an American doctor and cannot comment upon the case without the patients approval (or chance a ethics board and lawsuits). Commenting upon the case either happened a) illegally b) with Landis' approval (still questionable ethically) or c) it didn't happen- the only three possibilities. I would like to know which one. I hope, for the doctors sake, rather than Landis' that he confirmed the leak with permission (Landis is thus done for).
Uh, they were both on Larry King, Landis practically begging Kay to explain everything.

When King asked Kay if Landis was the current best cyclist in the world, Kay answered something like "without a question".
Helmet Head is offline  
Old 08-02-06, 01:31 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 583
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SoonerBent
I'm starting to have serious doubts. I hate to think that a rider would be stupid enough to take something that, according to almost everything I've read, doesn't provide instant performance enhancement.
https://www.velonews.com/race/int/articles/10613.0.html

"Its effects are felt almost immediately," Manzano wrote. "It gives you a lot of force and produces a sort of euphoria."
Dolomiti is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.